11.01.2015 Views

SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section<br />

1<br />

The <strong>SECCM</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

This document outlines the assessment processes and procedures employed in the School of Engineering,<br />

Computing and Construction Management (<strong>SECCM</strong>) at <strong>Roger</strong> <strong>Williams</strong> <strong>University</strong>. The goal of this<br />

assessment plan is to evaluate how well our graduates are meeting program objectives as well as<br />

measurable outcomes. The approaches used to implement a continuous quality improvement philosophy<br />

are described. They include periodic refinement of our objectives by incorporating feedback from our<br />

constituencies. Section 2, 3 and 4 of this document present the detailed educational objectives, anticipated<br />

outcomes and metrics to measure outcome achievement for each of our three programs: Engineering,<br />

Computer Science and Construction Management.<br />

Consistent with the design of any comprehensive assessment plan, our suite of evaluation instruments is<br />

also discussed in this document and copies of each are included in Section 5 of this document. We use this<br />

collective system of instruments to monitor our objectives and outcomes according to a detailed<br />

implementation timeline.<br />

As an introduction to our assessment plan terminology, Table 1.1 provides a summary of terms to ensure<br />

consistency in understanding the <strong>Roger</strong> <strong>Williams</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>SECCM</strong> continuous process improvement<br />

system. These definitions are periodically updated to reflect changes and modifications from our<br />

accrediting bodies as well as to incorporate input from our various constituencies.<br />

Table 1.1 Summary of Terminology<br />

Term<br />

Objectives<br />

Outcomes<br />

Operationalized<br />

Outcome<br />

Performance<br />

Criteria<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Evaluation<br />

Definition<br />

Statements that describe the expected accomplishments of graduates<br />

during the first three to five years following graduation from <strong>SECCM</strong>’s<br />

programs.<br />

Knowledge, skills and behavior that are we expect our graduates to possess<br />

at the time of graduation.<br />

A group of statements that define each outcome. These statements are<br />

expressed in a Bloom’s taxonomy hierarchy allowing for the assignment of<br />

performance criteria associated with each outcome.<br />

Metrics that are used to determine the accomplishment of outcomes and<br />

objectives.<br />

A collective system of processes directed at students and program<br />

constituencies that identify, collect, interpret, analyze and report data for the<br />

purpose of determining whether objectives and outcomes have been<br />

achieved.<br />

A collective system of processes that facilitate the review and discussion of<br />

assessment reports. Evaluation also includes the implementation of<br />

improvements to the three programs by means of existing and new change<br />

mechanisms.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!