SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University
SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University
Table 2.12 Course Mapping to Expected Engineering Student Outcomes, shows the result of the faculty assessment of exactly how much of the course material supports the achievement of the specific outcome. The input for this table is the respective course outcomes analysis prepared by each faculty member that was discussed in the previous section. Core concentration and core specialization courses outcomes forms are filled out by the Dean and Associate Dean of Engineering in collaboration with faculty members teaching these courses based on a review of course material as well as personal interviews. 30
- Page 1 and 2: School of Engineering, Computing an
- Page 3 and 4: Section 4 - Assessment Plan for the
- Page 5 and 6: Correlation of SECCM’s Goals and
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 1.1 Assessment Plan Interrel
- Page 9 and 10: Program Educational Objectives and
- Page 11 and 12: Table 1.2 Instruments and Materials
- Page 13 and 14: • Course Assessment Report One of
- Page 15 and 16: • Student enrollment trends • F
- Page 18 and 19: Section 2 Assessment Plan for the E
- Page 20 and 21: The Engineering program was origina
- Page 22 and 23: 6. Core Education Courses These cou
- Page 24 and 25: Table 2.7 RWU Engineering Program E
- Page 26 and 27: Relationship between Engineering Cu
- Page 28 and 29: Seminar Business elective Engineeri
- Page 30 and 31: Bloom’s taxonomy and derived from
- Page 34 and 35: Table 2.12 Course Mapping to Learni
- Page 36 and 37: Outcome Courses ENGR 405 Air Pollut
- Page 38 and 39: Outcome Courses COMSC 111 Data Stru
- Page 40 and 41: Outcome Courses WTNG 220 Critical W
- Page 42 and 43: Table 2.14 Outcome “b” Metrics
- Page 44 and 45: Table 2.16 Outcome “d” Metrics
- Page 46 and 47: Table 2.19 Outcome “g” Metrics
- Page 48 and 49: Table 2.22 Outcome “j” Metrics
- Page 50 and 51: Section 3 Assessment Plan for the C
- Page 52 and 53: Table 3.3 Data Structure Courses Co
- Page 54 and 55: Table 3.7 Mathematics and Science C
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3.9 RWU Computer Science Prog
- Page 58 and 59: Assigning Metrics to Outcomes The p
- Page 60 and 61: Table 3.12a Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 62 and 63: Table 3.12c Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3.12f Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 66 and 67: Table 3.13, Course Mapping to Compu
- Page 68 and 69: Table 2.14 Outcome “b” Metrics
- Page 70 and 71: Table 2.18 Outcome “f” Metrics
- Page 72 and 73: Section 4 Assessment Plan for the C
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4.3 Business and Management C
- Page 76 and 77: Construction Management Program Edu
- Page 78 and 79: Construction Management Program Out
- Page 80 and 81: Metric Goals for Each a-j Construct
Table 2.12 Course Mapping to Expected Engineering Student Outcomes, shows the result of the<br />
faculty assessment of exactly how much of the course material supports the achievement of the<br />
specific outcome. The input for this table is the respective course outcomes analysis prepared by<br />
each faculty member that was discussed in the previous section.<br />
Core concentration and core specialization courses outcomes forms are filled out by the Dean and<br />
Associate Dean of Engineering in collaboration with faculty members teaching these courses based<br />
on a review of course material as well as personal interviews.<br />
30
Change language