SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University
SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University
c. Engineering Program Outcomes The following table presents survey results indicating the instructor and student assessment of degree to which the course supported the Engineering Program Outcomes. See scale below. *Scale: 0 = unsatisfactory; 1 = marginal; 2 = satisfactory; 3 = good; and 4 = excellent. Engineering Program Educational Outcomes Faculty Evaluation Student Evaluation a. Student ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering 3.75 3.76 b. Student ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data 3.00 3.18 c. Student ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, 3.00 2.94 political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability d. Student ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 2.50 3.35 e. Student ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems 4.00 3.71 f. Student understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3.00 3.41 g. Student ability to communicate effectively 3.50 3.47 h. Student understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context 3.50 3.12 i. Student a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning 3.50 3.53 j. Student knowledge of contemporary issues 3.50 3.00 k. Student to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 3.50 3.65 d. Course Incoming/Outgoing GPA Statistics Semester Number of Students Incoming GPA Outgoing GPA Delta (+/-) Fall 2001 21 2.879 2.730 -0.149 Fall 2002 20 2.925 2.917 -0.0085 Fall 2003 21 3.011 3.207 +0.196 Fall 2004 22 2.896 2.651 -0.245
e. Average Time Data ENGR 330 Time Survey Fall 2004 250.0 200.0 Minutes 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 Lesson 3. Course Recommendations Semester Average Time/Lesson (min) Fall 2001 81.9 Fall 2002 78.6 Fall 2003 60.7 Fall 2004 64.4 While no significant changes are proposed at this time, I do intend to introduce more outside reading and writing assignments in order to provide more historical and current context for the subject material. Enclosure 1 – Administrative Handouts Enclosure 2 – Course Syllabus Enclosure 3 – RWU Course Survey Summary, Fall 2004
- Page 53 and 54: Table 3.5 Concepts of Programming L
- Page 55 and 56: Senior Capstone Sequence The hallma
- Page 57 and 58: Computer Science Program Outcomes C
- Page 59 and 60: Table 3.12 Sample of Outcomes Works
- Page 61 and 62: Table 3.12b Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 63 and 64: Table 3.12e Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 65 and 66: Table 3.12g Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 67 and 68: Metric Goals for Each a-g Computer
- Page 69 and 70: Table 2.16 Outcome “d” Metrics
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2.19 Outcome “g” Metrics
- Page 73 and 74: Table 4.1 General Education Courses
- Page 75 and 76: Table 4.5 Construction Course Numbe
- Page 77 and 78: Table 4.8 Alignment and Mapping of
- Page 79 and 80: Table 4.9 Construction Management P
- Page 81 and 82: Table 4.13 Outcome “b” Metrics
- Page 83 and 84: Table 4.17 Outcome “f” Metrics
- Page 85 and 86: Table 4.20 Outcome “i” Metrics
- Page 88 and 89: Engineering Senior Exit Survey Scho
- Page 90: Programs/Services/Individuals Extre
- Page 93 and 94: 5. Were there any activities, progr
- Page 96 and 97: Construction Management Senior Exit
- Page 98: 7. What would you say is the greate
- Page 101 and 102: SECCM Course Assessment Report Cont
- Page 103: Student assessments of course objec
- Page 107 and 108: d. Development of a written assessm
- Page 109 and 110: computers imaged the same as those
- Page 114 and 115: 18. How long did it take you to fin
- Page 116 and 117: ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF
- Page 118 and 119: ENGR 490 Skills Inventory School of
- Page 120 and 121: School of Engineering, Computing, a
- Page 122 and 123: Student ___________________________
- Page 124 and 125: Student ___________________________
e. Average Time Data<br />
ENGR 330 Time Survey Fall 2004<br />
250.0<br />
200.0<br />
Minutes<br />
150.0<br />
100.0<br />
50.0<br />
0.0<br />
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40<br />
Lesson<br />
3. Course Recommendations<br />
Semester<br />
Average Time/Lesson<br />
(min)<br />
Fall 2001 81.9<br />
Fall 2002 78.6<br />
Fall 2003 60.7<br />
Fall 2004 64.4<br />
While no significant changes are proposed at this time, I do intend to introduce more outside reading and<br />
writing assignments in order to provide more historical and current context for the subject material.<br />
Enclosure 1 – Administrative Handouts<br />
Enclosure 2 – Course Syllabus<br />
Enclosure 3 – RWU Course Survey Summary, Fall 2004
Change language