SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

c. Engineering Program Outcomes The following table presents survey results indicating the instructor and student assessment of degree to which the course supported the Engineering Program Outcomes. See scale below. *Scale: 0 = unsatisfactory; 1 = marginal; 2 = satisfactory; 3 = good; and 4 = excellent. Engineering Program Educational Outcomes Faculty Evaluation Student Evaluation a. Student ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering 3.75 3.76 b. Student ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data 3.00 3.18 c. Student ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, 3.00 2.94 political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability d. Student ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 2.50 3.35 e. Student ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems 4.00 3.71 f. Student understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3.00 3.41 g. Student ability to communicate effectively 3.50 3.47 h. Student understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context 3.50 3.12 i. Student a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning 3.50 3.53 j. Student knowledge of contemporary issues 3.50 3.00 k. Student to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 3.50 3.65 d. Course Incoming/Outgoing GPA Statistics Semester Number of Students Incoming GPA Outgoing GPA Delta (+/-) Fall 2001 21 2.879 2.730 -0.149 Fall 2002 20 2.925 2.917 -0.0085 Fall 2003 21 3.011 3.207 +0.196 Fall 2004 22 2.896 2.651 -0.245
e. Average Time Data ENGR 330 Time Survey Fall 2004 250.0 200.0 Minutes 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 Lesson 3. Course Recommendations Semester Average Time/Lesson (min) Fall 2001 81.9 Fall 2002 78.6 Fall 2003 60.7 Fall 2004 64.4 While no significant changes are proposed at this time, I do intend to introduce more outside reading and writing assignments in order to provide more historical and current context for the subject material. Enclosure 1 – Administrative Handouts Enclosure 2 – Course Syllabus Enclosure 3 – RWU Course Survey Summary, Fall 2004
Page 1 and 2:
School of Engineering, Computing an
Page 3 and 4:
Section 4 - Assessment Plan for the
Page 5 and 6:
Correlation of SECCM’s Goals and
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 1.1 Assessment Plan Interrel
Page 9 and 10:
Program Educational Objectives and
Page 11 and 12:
Table 1.2 Instruments and Materials
Page 13 and 14:
• Course Assessment Report One of
Page 15 and 16:
• Student enrollment trends • F
Page 18 and 19:
Section 2 Assessment Plan for the E
Page 20 and 21:
The Engineering program was origina
Page 22 and 23:
6. Core Education Courses These cou
Page 24 and 25:
Table 2.7 RWU Engineering Program E
Page 26 and 27:
Relationship between Engineering Cu
Page 28 and 29:
Seminar Business elective Engineeri
Page 30 and 31:
Bloom’s taxonomy and derived from
Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.12 Course Mapping to Expect
Page 35 and 36:
Outcome Courses ENGR 300 Mechanics
Page 37 and 38:
Outcome Courses ENGR 424 Digital Si
Page 39 and 40:
Outcome Courses CORE 103 Human Beha
Page 41 and 42:
Metric Goals for Each a-k Engineeri
Page 43 and 44:
Table 2.15 Outcome “c” Metrics
Page 45 and 46:
Table 2.18 Outcome “f” Metrics
Page 47 and 48:
Table 2.20 Outcome “h” Metrics
Page 49 and 50:
Table 2.23 Outcome “k” Metrics
Page 51 and 52:
Table 3.1 General Program Breakdown
Page 53 and 54: Table 3.5 Concepts of Programming L
Page 55 and 56: Senior Capstone Sequence The hallma
Page 57 and 58: Computer Science Program Outcomes C
Page 59 and 60: Table 3.12 Sample of Outcomes Works
Page 61 and 62: Table 3.12b Sample of Outcomes Work
Page 63 and 64: Table 3.12e Sample of Outcomes Work
Page 65 and 66: Table 3.12g Sample of Outcomes Work
Page 67 and 68: Metric Goals for Each a-g Computer
Page 69 and 70: Table 2.16 Outcome “d” Metrics
Page 71 and 72: Table 2.19 Outcome “g” Metrics
Page 73 and 74: Table 4.1 General Education Courses
Page 75 and 76: Table 4.5 Construction Course Numbe
Page 77 and 78: Table 4.8 Alignment and Mapping of
Page 79 and 80: Table 4.9 Construction Management P
Page 81 and 82: Table 4.13 Outcome “b” Metrics
Page 83 and 84: Table 4.17 Outcome “f” Metrics
Page 85 and 86: Table 4.20 Outcome “i” Metrics
Page 88 and 89: Engineering Senior Exit Survey Scho
Page 90: Programs/Services/Individuals Extre
Page 93 and 94: 5. Were there any activities, progr
Page 96 and 97: Construction Management Senior Exit
Page 98: 7. What would you say is the greate
Page 101 and 102: SECCM Course Assessment Report Cont
Page 103: Student assessments of course objec
Page 107 and 108: d. Development of a written assessm
Page 109 and 110: computers imaged the same as those
Page 114 and 115: 18. How long did it take you to fin
Page 116 and 117: ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF
Page 118 and 119: ENGR 490 Skills Inventory School of
Page 120 and 121: School of Engineering, Computing, a
Page 122 and 123: Student ___________________________
Page 124 and 125: Student ___________________________
show all

SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?