Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

11.01.2015 Views

Section 3.4 - Other Stormwater Management Faculties This page intentionally left blank. Page 3 - 180 Volume 2, Technical Guidance

Section 3.4.1 - Conventional Dry Detention Pond 3.4.1 Conventional Dry Detention Pond Other Water Quantity Facility Description: A surface storage basin or facility designed to provide water quantity control through detention of stormwater runoff. KEY CONSIDERATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA: • Designed for runoff quantity (peak flow) control ADVANTAGES / BENEFITS: • Typically less costly than stormwater (wet) ponds for equivalent flood storage • Used in conjunction with water quality structural control • Recreational and other open space opportunities between storm runoff events DISADVANTAGES / LIMITATIONS: • Controls for stormwater quantity only MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: • Remove debris from inlet and outlet structures • Maintain side slopes/remove invasive vegetation • Monitor sediment accumulation and remove periodically • Dam inspection and maintenance POLLUTANT REMOVAL -- Total Suspended Solids -- Nutrients – Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen -- Metals – Cadmium, Copper, Lead & Zinc -- Pathogens – Coliform, Streptococci & E. Coli STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY Water Quality Protection Channel Protection On-Site Flood Control Downstream IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS M L M Land Requirements Relative Capital Costs Maintenance Burden Residential Subdivision Use: Yes High Density/Ultra-Urban: No Drainage Area: No restrictions Soils: Hydrologic group ‘A’ and ‘B’ soils may require pond liner if groundwater mounding is not desirable Other Considerations: • Recreational and open space uses for dry detention L=Low M=Moderate H=High Volume 2, Technical Guidance Page 3 - 181

Section 3.4.1 - Conventional Dry Detention Pond<br />

3.4.1 Conventional Dry Detention Pond Other Water Quantity Facility<br />

Description: A surface storage basin or facility<br />

designed to provide water quantity control through<br />

detention <strong>of</strong> stormwater run<strong>of</strong>f.<br />

KEY CONSIDERATIONS<br />

DESIGN CRITERIA:<br />

• Designed for run<strong>of</strong>f quantity (peak flow) control<br />

ADVANTAGES / BENEFITS:<br />

• Typically less costly than stormwater (wet) ponds for<br />

equivalent flood storage<br />

• Used in conjunction with water quality structural control<br />

• Recreational and other open space opportunities between<br />

storm run<strong>of</strong>f events<br />

DISADVANTAGES / LIMITATIONS:<br />

• Controls for stormwater quantity only<br />

MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS:<br />

• Remove debris from inlet and outlet structures<br />

• Maintain side slopes/remove invasive vegetation<br />

• Monitor sediment accumulation and remove periodically<br />

• Dam inspection and maintenance<br />

POLLUTANT REMOVAL<br />

-- Total Suspended Solids<br />

-- Nutrients – Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen<br />

-- Metals – Cadmium, Copper, Lead & Zinc<br />

-- Pathogens – Coliform, Streptococci & E. Coli<br />

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT<br />

SUITABILITY<br />

Water Quality Protection<br />

Channel Protection<br />

On-Site Flood Control<br />

Downstream<br />

IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS<br />

M<br />

L<br />

M<br />

Land Requirements<br />

Relative Capital Costs<br />

Maintenance Burden<br />

Residential Subdivision Use: Yes<br />

High Density/Ultra-Urban: No<br />

Drainage Area: No restrictions<br />

Soils: Hydrologic group ‘A’ and ‘B’ soils<br />

may require pond liner if groundwater<br />

mounding is not desirable<br />

Other Considerations:<br />

• Recreational and open space uses for<br />

dry detention<br />

L=Low M=Moderate H=High<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 2, Technical Guidance Page 3 - 181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!