Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

11.01.2015 Views

Section 3.3.4 - Underground Sand Filter Figure 3-51 Schematic of Perimeter (Delaware) Sand Filter (Source: Center for Watershed Protection) Page 3 - 174 Volume 2, Technical Guidance

Section 3.3.5 - Organic Filter 3.3.5 Organic Filter Secondary Water Quality Facility Description: Design variation of the surface sand filter using organic materials in the filter media. KEY CONSIDERATIONS DESIGN CRITERIA: • Minimum head requirement of 5 to 8 feet ADVANTAGES / BENEFITS: • High pollutant removal capability • Removal of dissolved pollutants is greater than sand filters due to cation exchangee capacity STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY Water Quality Protection Channel Protection On-Site Flood Control Downstream Flood Control DISADVANTAGES / LIMITATIONS: • Severe cloggingg potential if exposed soil surfaces exist upstream • Intended for hotspot or space-limited applications, or for areas requiring enhanced pollutant removal capability • High maintenance requirements • Filter may require more frequent maintenance than most of the other stormwater controls MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: • Mow and stabilize the area draining to the organic filter • Remove sediment from filter bed POLLUTANT REMOVAL H Total Suspended Solids M Nutrients – Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen Accepts Hotspo Runoff: Yes IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS L Land Requirements H Relative Capital Costs H Maintenance Burden Residential Subdivision Use: No High Density/Ultra-Urban: Yes Drainage Area: 10 acres max. Soils: No restrictions Other Considerations: • Hotspot areas L=Low M= =Moderate H=High H M Metals – Cadmium, Copper, Lead & Zinc Pathogens – Coliform, Streptococci & E. Coli Volume 2, Technical Guidance Page 3 - 175

Section 3.3.5 - Organic Filter<br />

3.3.5<br />

Organic Filter<br />

Secondary Water Quality Facility<br />

Description: Design variation <strong>of</strong> the surface sand filter<br />

using organic materials in the filter<br />

media.<br />

KEY CONSIDERATIONS<br />

DESIGN CRITERIA:<br />

• Minimum head requirement <strong>of</strong> 5 to 8 feet<br />

ADVANTAGES / BENEFITS:<br />

• High pollutant removal capability<br />

• Removal <strong>of</strong> dissolved pollutants is greater than sand<br />

filters due to cation exchangee capacity<br />

<br />

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT<br />

SUITABILITY<br />

Water Quality Protection<br />

Channel Protection<br />

On-Site Flood Control<br />

Downstream<br />

Flood Control<br />

DISADVANTAGES / LIMITATIONS:<br />

• Severe cloggingg potential if exposed soil surfaces exist<br />

upstream<br />

• Intended for hotspot or space-limited applications, or for<br />

areas requiring enhanced pollutant removal capability<br />

• High maintenance requirements<br />

• Filter may require more frequent maintenance than most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the other stormwater controls<br />

MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS:<br />

• Mow and stabilize the area draining to the<br />

organic filter<br />

• Remove sediment from filter bed<br />

POLLUTANT<br />

REMOVAL<br />

H Total Suspended Solids<br />

M Nutrients – Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen<br />

Accepts Hotspo<br />

Run<strong>of</strong>f: Yes<br />

IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS<br />

L Land Requirements<br />

H Relative Capital Costs<br />

H Maintenance Burden<br />

Residential Subdivision Use: No<br />

High<br />

Density/Ultra-Urban: Yes<br />

Drainage Area: 10 acres max.<br />

Soils: No restrictions<br />

Other Considerations:<br />

• Hotspot areas<br />

L=Low M= =Moderate H=High<br />

H<br />

M<br />

Metals<br />

– Cadmium, Copper, Lead & Zinc<br />

Pathogens – Coliform, Streptococci & E. Coli<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 2, Technical Guidance<br />

Page 3 - 175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!