11.01.2015 Views

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 3.1 - Stormwater Management Controls Overview<br />

• Locating a structural control within an area that is strongly discouraged, and is only<br />

allowed on a case by case basis. Local, State, and/or federal permits shall be obtained,<br />

and the applicant will need to supply additional documentation to justify locating the<br />

stormwater control within the regulated area.<br />

• Structural stormwater controls located in accordance with local setback requirements.<br />

This checklist is only intended as a general guide to location and permitting requirements as<br />

they relate to siting <strong>of</strong> stormwater structural controls. Consultation with the appropriate<br />

regulatory agency or authority is the best strategy.<br />

Table 3-3 Location and Permitting Checklist<br />

Site Feature<br />

Jurisdictional Wetland<br />

(Waters <strong>of</strong> the U.S)<br />

U.S. Army<br />

Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers<br />

Regulatory Permit<br />

Stream Channel<br />

(Waters <strong>of</strong> the U.S)<br />

U.S. Army<br />

Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers Section<br />

404 Permit<br />

Location and Permitting Guidance<br />

Jurisdictional wetlands should be delineated prior to siting<br />

structural control.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> natural wetlands for stormwater quality treatment is<br />

contrary to the goals <strong>of</strong> the Clean Water Act and should be<br />

avoided.<br />

Stormwater should be treated prior to discharge into a natural<br />

wetland.<br />

Structural controls may also be restricted in local buffer zones.<br />

Buffer zones may be utilized as a non-structural filter strip<br />

(i.e., accept sheet flow).<br />

Should justify that no practical upland preventive treatment<br />

alternatives exist.<br />

Where practical, excess stormwater flows should be conveyed<br />

away from jurisdictional wetlands.<br />

All Waters <strong>of</strong> the U.S. (streams, ponds, lakes, etc.) should be<br />

delineated prior to design.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> any Waters <strong>of</strong> the U.S. for stormwater quality treatment<br />

is contrary to the goals <strong>of</strong> the Clean Water Act and should be<br />

avoided.<br />

Stormwater should be treated prior to discharge into Waters <strong>of</strong><br />

the U.S.<br />

In-stream ponds for stormwater quality treatment are highly<br />

discouraged.<br />

Must justify that no practical upland preventive treatment<br />

alternatives exist.<br />

Temporary run<strong>of</strong>f storage preferred over permanent pools.<br />

Implement measures that reduce downstream warming.<br />

Stream and Floodplain<br />

Permits<br />

Kansas Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture<br />

<br />

Kansas Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture - Division <strong>of</strong> Water<br />

Resources permits for stream obstruction, channel change,<br />

flood plain fill, levee, water appropriations and buffers.<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 2, Technical Guidance Page 3 - 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!