Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita
Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita
Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter 3.2.8.1 General Description Sand filters (also referred to as filtration basins) are structural stormwater controls that capture and temporarily store stormwater runoff and pass it through a filter bed of sand. Most sand filter systems consist of two-chamber structures. The first chamber is a sediment forebay or sedimentation chamber, which removes floatables and heavy sediments. The second is the filtration chamber, which removes additional pollutants by filtering the runoff through a sand bed. The filtered runoff is typically collected and returned to the conveyance system, though it can also be partially or fully infiltrated into the surrounding soil in areas with porous soils if not used for hotspot treatment, and if the infiltration face is at least 5 feet above the historically high groundwater elevation. Because they have few site constraints beside head requirements, sand filters can be used on development sites where the use of other structural controls may be precluded. However, sand filter systems can be relatively expensive to construct, install, and maintain. Surface Sand Filter: The surface sand filter is a ground-level open air structure that consists of a pretreatment sediment forebay and a filter bed chamber. This system can treat drainage areas up to 10 acres in size and is typically located off-line. Surface sand filters can be designed as an excavation with earthen embankments or as a concrete or block structure. Figure 3-28 Sand Filter Example 3.2.8.2 Stormwater Management Suitability Sand filter systems are designed primarily as off-line systems for stormwater quality (i.e., the removal of stormwater pollutants) and will typically need to be used in conjunction with another structural control to provide downstream channel protection, on-site flood control, and downstream flood control, if required. However, under certain circumstances, filters can provide limited runoff quantity control, particularly for smaller storm events. Page 3 - 98 Volume 2, Technical Guidance
Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter Water Quality In sand filter systems, stormwater pollutants are removed through a combination of gravitational settling, filtration, and adsorption. The filtration process effectively reduces suspended solids and particulates, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), fecal coliform bacteria, and other pollutants. Surface sand filters with a grass cover have additional opportunities for vegetation uptake of pollutants, particularly nutrients. Channel Protection For smaller sites, a sand filter may be designed to capture the entire CPv in either an off- or on-line configuration. Given that a sand filter system is typically designed to completely drain over 40 hours, the requirement of extended detention of the 1-year, 24-hour storm runoff volume will be met. For larger sites or where only the WQv is diverted to the sand filter facility, another structural control must be used to provide CPv extended detention. On-Site Flood Control Another structural control must be used in conjunction with a sand filter system to reduce the post-development peak flow to pre-development levels (detention) if needed. Downstream Flood Control Sand filter facilities must provide flow diversion and/or be designed to safely pass design flood events and protect the filter bed and facility. The volume of runoff removed and treated by the sand filter may be included in the on-site flood control and downstream flood control calculations. (See Chapter 3.) 3.2.8.3 Pollutant Removal Capabilities The surface sand filter is presumed to be able to remove 80% of the total suspended solids load in typical urban post-development runoff when sized, designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with the recommended specifications. Undersized or poorly designed sand filters can reduce TSS removal performance. The following design pollutant removal rates are average pollutant reduction percentages for design purposes derived from sampling data, modeling, and professional judgment. In a situation where a removal rate is not deemed sufficient, additional controls may be put in place at the given site in a series or “treatment train” approach. • Total Suspended Solids – 80% • Total Phosphorus – 50% • Total Nitrogen – 30% • Heavy Metals – 50% Volume 2, Technical Guidance Page 3 - 99
- Page 53 and 54: Section 3.2.2 - Extended Dry Detent
- Page 55 and 56: Section 3.2.2 - Extended Dry Detent
- Page 57 and 58: Section 3.2.2 - Extended Dry Detent
- Page 59 and 60: Section 3.2.3 - Vegetative Filter S
- Page 61 and 62: Section 3.2.3 - Vegetative Filter S
- Page 63 and 64: Section 3.2.3 - Vegetative Filter S
- Page 65 and 66: Section 3.2.3 - Vegetative Filter S
- Page 67 and 68: Section 3.2.4 - Grassed Channel 3.2
- Page 69 and 70: Section 3.2.4 - Grassed Channel 3.2
- Page 71 and 72: Section 3.2.4 - Grassed Channel 3.2
- Page 73 and 74: Section 3.2.4 - Grassed Channel max
- Page 75 and 76: Section 3.2.5 - Enhanced Swale 3.2.
- Page 77 and 78: Section 3.2.5 - Enhanced Swale Chan
- Page 79 and 80: Section 3.2.5 - Enhanced Swale B. G
- Page 81 and 82: Section 3.2.5 - Enhanced Swale High
- Page 83 and 84: Section 3.2.5 - Enhanced Swale Side
- Page 85 and 86: Section 3.2.5 - Enhanced Swale 3.2.
- Page 87 and 88: Section 3.2.6 - Infiltration Trench
- Page 89 and 90: Section 3.2.6 - Infiltration Trench
- Page 91 and 92: Section 3.2.6 - Infiltration Trench
- Page 93 and 94: Section 3.2.6 - Infiltration Trench
- Page 95 and 96: Section 3.2.6 - Infiltration Trench
- Page 97 and 98: Section 3.2.6 - Infiltration Trench
- Page 99 and 100: Section 3.2.7 - Soakage Trench 3.2.
- Page 101 and 102: Section 3.2.7 - Soakage Trench •
- Page 103: Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter
- Page 107 and 108: Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter
- Page 109 and 110: Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter
- Page 111 and 112: Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter
- Page 113 and 114: Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter
- Page 115 and 116: Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter
- Page 117 and 118: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 119 and 120: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 121 and 122: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 123 and 124: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 125 and 126: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 127 and 128: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 129 and 130: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 131 and 132: Section 3.2.9 - Bioretention Areas
- Page 133 and 134: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 135 and 136: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 137 and 138: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 139 and 140: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 141 and 142: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 143 and 144: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 145 and 146: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 147 and 148: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 149 and 150: Section 3.2.10 - Stormwater Wetland
- Page 151 and 152: Section 3.3 - Secondary TSS Treatme
- Page 153 and 154: Section 3.3.1 - Proprietary Treatme
Section 3.2.8 - Surface Sand Filter<br />
Water Quality<br />
In sand filter systems, stormwater pollutants are removed through a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
gravitational settling, filtration, and adsorption. The filtration process effectively reduces<br />
suspended solids and particulates, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), fecal coliform<br />
bacteria, and other pollutants. Surface sand filters with a grass cover have additional<br />
opportunities for vegetation uptake <strong>of</strong> pollutants, particularly nutrients.<br />
Channel Protection<br />
For smaller sites, a sand filter may be designed to capture the entire CPv in either an <strong>of</strong>f- or<br />
on-line configuration. Given that a sand filter system is typically designed to completely drain<br />
over 40 hours, the requirement <strong>of</strong> extended detention <strong>of</strong> the 1-year, 24-hour storm run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
volume will be met. For larger sites or where only the WQv is diverted to the sand filter<br />
facility, another structural control must be used to provide CPv extended detention.<br />
On-Site Flood Control<br />
Another structural control must be used in conjunction with a sand filter system to reduce the<br />
post-development peak flow to pre-development levels (detention) if needed.<br />
Downstream Flood Control<br />
Sand filter facilities must provide flow diversion and/or be designed to safely pass design flood<br />
events and protect the filter bed and facility.<br />
The volume <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f removed and treated by the sand filter may be included in the on-site<br />
flood control and downstream flood control calculations. (See <strong>Chapter</strong> 3.)<br />
3.2.8.3 Pollutant Removal Capabilities<br />
The surface sand filter is presumed to be able to remove 80% <strong>of</strong> the total suspended solids<br />
load in typical urban post-development run<strong>of</strong>f when sized, designed, constructed and<br />
maintained in accordance with the recommended specifications. Undersized or poorly<br />
designed sand filters can reduce TSS removal performance.<br />
The following design pollutant removal rates are average pollutant reduction percentages for<br />
design purposes derived from sampling data, modeling, and pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment. In a<br />
situation where a removal rate is not deemed sufficient, additional controls may be put in<br />
place at the given site in a series or “treatment train” approach.<br />
• Total Suspended Solids – 80%<br />
• Total Phosphorus – 50%<br />
• Total Nitrogen – 30%<br />
• Heavy Metals – 50%<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 2, Technical Guidance Page 3 - 99