11.01.2015 Views

Master Thesis - OUFTI-1

Master Thesis - OUFTI-1

Master Thesis - OUFTI-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Young's modulus: E = 205 GP a<br />

• Poisson ratio: ν = 0.3<br />

• Density: ρ = 7850 kg/m 3<br />

Consider also that the plate has a constant thickness of 1.6 mm (which is the given<br />

thickness of <strong>OUFTI</strong>-1 PCBs). This plate was meshed once with volume elements and<br />

once with shell elements. Then, the two sets of results are correlated. The most popular<br />

correlation techniques make use of natural frequencies ω and mode shapes φ. And, the<br />

most popular indicators of the correlation between two sets of data are:<br />

• The frequency deviation, that can be calculated using Equation 4.2.3.<br />

This indicator is generally expressed in %.<br />

∆f (ω 1 , ω 2 ) = |ω 1 − ω 2 |<br />

ω 1<br />

(4.2.3)<br />

• The Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC), that can be calculated using Equation 4.2.4.<br />

MAC (φ 1 , φ 2 ) =<br />

(<br />

φ<br />

T<br />

1 φ 2<br />

) 2<br />

(φ T 1 φ 1 ) (φ T 2 φ 2 )<br />

(4.2.4)<br />

MAC values oscillate between 0 and 1, a unitary value meaning perfect correlation.<br />

The results obtained by using these two indicators in our particular case, are presented<br />

in Table 4.1 and in Figure 4.5.<br />

Natural frequencies obtained Natural frequencies obtained Frequency<br />

using volume elements (Hz) using shell elements (Hz) deviations (%)<br />

1 528.2 527.8 0.08<br />

2 771 770.2 0.1<br />

3 954.8 953.8 0.1<br />

4 1364.1 1361.9 0.16<br />

5 1364.1 1361.9 0.16<br />

Table 4.1: Frequency deviations between the two models<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!