Master Thesis - OUFTI-1
Master Thesis - OUFTI-1
Master Thesis - OUFTI-1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Young's modulus: E = 205 GP a<br />
• Poisson ratio: ν = 0.3<br />
• Density: ρ = 7850 kg/m 3<br />
Consider also that the plate has a constant thickness of 1.6 mm (which is the given<br />
thickness of <strong>OUFTI</strong>-1 PCBs). This plate was meshed once with volume elements and<br />
once with shell elements. Then, the two sets of results are correlated. The most popular<br />
correlation techniques make use of natural frequencies ω and mode shapes φ. And, the<br />
most popular indicators of the correlation between two sets of data are:<br />
• The frequency deviation, that can be calculated using Equation 4.2.3.<br />
This indicator is generally expressed in %.<br />
∆f (ω 1 , ω 2 ) = |ω 1 − ω 2 |<br />
ω 1<br />
(4.2.3)<br />
• The Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC), that can be calculated using Equation 4.2.4.<br />
MAC (φ 1 , φ 2 ) =<br />
(<br />
φ<br />
T<br />
1 φ 2<br />
) 2<br />
(φ T 1 φ 1 ) (φ T 2 φ 2 )<br />
(4.2.4)<br />
MAC values oscillate between 0 and 1, a unitary value meaning perfect correlation.<br />
The results obtained by using these two indicators in our particular case, are presented<br />
in Table 4.1 and in Figure 4.5.<br />
Natural frequencies obtained Natural frequencies obtained Frequency<br />
using volume elements (Hz) using shell elements (Hz) deviations (%)<br />
1 528.2 527.8 0.08<br />
2 771 770.2 0.1<br />
3 954.8 953.8 0.1<br />
4 1364.1 1361.9 0.16<br />
5 1364.1 1361.9 0.16<br />
Table 4.1: Frequency deviations between the two models<br />
77