11.01.2015 Views

Spring 2012 - Clarion University

Spring 2012 - Clarion University

Spring 2012 - Clarion University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

theGLitch<br />

“It began with the Status of Women<br />

Subcommittee, with a few of us meeting in the<br />

basement of Harvey Hall. We were feminists and<br />

any project that would advance the cause of<br />

women was a good thing. Understanding the<br />

milieu of the times matters—the Mary Keetz Study<br />

at West Chester showed the predominance<br />

of male administrators and faculty across the<br />

system, and other areas where the academy<br />

failed to recognize the contributions of women.<br />

CU was not an exception.<br />

Creating a WS Program was a good thing,<br />

something we as founders thought important.<br />

You ask, How did it finally happen How does<br />

a flower grow The process felt like a natural<br />

evolution of activist minds collaborating. I don’t<br />

think of it in terms of defining events, more like a<br />

flow.<br />

While as her partner, I could not vote on Dr.<br />

Deb for director, I knew she was the right person<br />

for the times.”<br />

Kathryn graham, Ph.D.<br />

retired Faculty, english<br />

Chair, ws Founding Committee and advisory Council<br />

The one glitch in the process of establishing the Women’s<br />

Studies program, outside of the condition of the space, occurred<br />

when some of the promised funding was delayed. The intended<br />

director of the new program withdrew in protest. Some committee<br />

members wanted the committee to follow suit. Fearful of losing all we<br />

had worked for, i called an eleventh hour meeting of the<br />

committee to discuss a course of action. We finally agreed that if<br />

a suitable director could be found, we would proceed in spite of the<br />

delayed funding. The final result of this crisis was naming<br />

Deborah Burghardt as DireCtor oF woMen’s<br />

stuDies.<br />

Many of us on the committee had seen Deb in action with<br />

students and were confident in her leadership capability. But<br />

few could have predicted the incredible enthusiasm and energy<br />

she brought to the job and her ability to galvanize the campus<br />

community. If Dean Scanlon was the single most important person<br />

in institutionalizing the Women’s Studies Program, then Deborah<br />

Burghardt was the guarantor of the program’s long-term<br />

success. It is impossible to overestimate the contribution Deb has<br />

made to Women’s Studies at <strong>Clarion</strong> for 20 years during my personal<br />

involvement in them.<br />

5<br />

~ richard nicholls, Ph.D.<br />

Psychology and ws Founder

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!