Metropolitan Melbourne Investigation Discussion Paper - Victorian ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

36 Figure 2.6 Existing native vegetation in the Metropolitan Melbourne investigation area Source: Department of Sustainability and Environment (2005)
Figure 2.7 Proportion (%) of remnant vegetation remaining within the investigation area and within bioregions as a whole Entire bioregion Investigation area Bioregion Central Victorian Uplands 3,552 ha 519,813 ha Otway Plain 611 ha 80,065 ha Victorian Volcanic Plain 273,554 ha 36,021 ha Highlands–Southern Fall 86,081 ha 875,456 ha Gippsland Plain 19,066 ha 289,980 ha 0 20 40 60 80 100 % Native vegetation quality While EVC mapping describes the extent and composition of vegetation within the investigation area, it does not provide information on the quality of the vegetation. DSE has mapped vegetation quality at a landscape scale within Victoria based on assessment of the biophysical components of the site (site condition), the size of the patch and its proximity to other patches of remnant vegetation (landscape context). 52 DSE has modelled vegetation quality across Victoria, with categories ranging from ‘poor’ to ‘good’ quality. Areas of poor quality, for example, may have remnant overstorey trees remaining but the understorey components are often absent or degraded due to clearing and/or invasion by weeds. Conversely, areas considered good quality, have most or all components of the vegetation community remaining intact. Vegetation quality within metropolitan Melbourne is highly variable (see fi gure 2.8). It is generally higher in the north-eastern and eastern parts of Melbourne around Gembrook, Christmas Hills and Warrandyte. Medium quality vegetation generally occurs in the western part of Melbourne around Rockbank, Tarneit, Mount Cottrell and Wyndham Vale while large areas of poor quality vegetation occur in the north and north-west around Sunbury and Craigieburn. 37
Page 1 and 2: Metropolitan Melbourne Investigatio
Page 3 and 4: Metropolitan Melbourne Investigatio
Page 5 and 6: Council members (left to right): G
Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS Foreword 1 The structure o
Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY picture of the us
Page 11 and 12: PART A INTRODUCTION This part provi
Page 13 and 14: Metropolitan Melbourne’s populati
Page 15 and 16: 1.4 Scope of the investigation This
Page 17 and 18: sporting facilities and parks, gard
Page 19 and 20: 1.7 Policy context 1.7.1 INTERNATIO
Page 21: A signifi cant, staged increase in
Page 24 and 25: 2 METROPOLITAN MELBOURNE - THE PLAC
Page 26 and 27: 22 Figure 2.1 Geology of the invest
Page 28 and 29: Beaumaris and Sandringham. This are
Page 30 and 31: 26 Figure 2.2 Geomorphological unit
Page 32 and 33: had a signifi cant impact on many b
Page 34 and 35: Water quality Water quality is natu
Page 36 and 37: 2.3 Biodiversity Biodiversity refer
Page 38 and 39: 2.3.3 ECOLOGICAL VEGETATION CLASSES
Page 42 and 43: 38 Figure 2.8 Vegetation quality wi
Page 44 and 45: A total of 495 native vertebrate fa
Page 46 and 47: Box 2.3 Eltham copper butterfly The
Page 48 and 49: The investigation area contains abo
Page 50 and 51: Globally, warming is accelerating.
Page 52 and 53: Figure 2.11 Average annual inflows
Page 54 and 55: 3 METROPOLITAN MELBOURNE - THE PEOP
Page 56 and 57: Box 3.1 Woodlands Historic Park Woo
Page 58 and 59: Figure 3.2 ‘Batman’s Treaty wit
Page 60 and 61: 3.3.2 THE GROWTH AND URBANISATION O
Page 62 and 63: 3.3.3 MELBOURNE’S PLANNING HISTOR
Page 64 and 65: 3.4 The people of metropolitan Melb
Page 66 and 67: 3.4.2 MELBOURNE’S FUTURE POPULATI
Page 68 and 69: 4 PUBLIC LAND The Victorian Environ
Page 70 and 71: G Other government departments own
Page 72 and 73: 4.4 Public land use categories An e
Page 74 and 75: National and state parks Victoria
Page 76 and 77: Other natural features reserves suc
Page 78 and 79: Table 4.5 Regional parks in the inv
Page 80 and 81: and tensions between user groups ar
Page 82 and 83: and utilities areas than elsewhere
Page 84 and 85: Table 4.6 Reference areas NAME AREA
Page 86 and 87: A summary of popular sport and recr
Page 88 and 89: Recycled water Melburnians use abou
Page 90 and 91:
4.7.5 COMMERCIAL RESOURCE USES Acro
Page 93 and 94:
PART D THE CONTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC L
Page 95 and 96:
5.3 The contribution of public land
Page 97 and 98:
LIVEABILITY GOAL: Dynamic resilient
Page 99 and 100:
5.4 Opportunities for enhancing the
Page 101 and 102:
Table 6.1 Open space categories CAT
Page 103 and 104:
6.3 A history of Melbourne’s publ
Page 105 and 106:
6.4 Open space strategies for metro
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 6.2 Urban growth boundary an
Page 109 and 110:
Trails are an important component o
Page 111 and 112:
Public open space per capita Public
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 6.7 Public open space per ca
Page 115 and 116:
6.9 Providing new open space Box 6.
Page 117 and 118:
COMMENTS INVITED The open space con
Page 119 and 120:
Parklands and gardens The City of M
Page 121 and 122:
Coastal impacts Sea-level rise in f
Page 123 and 124:
8 ENHANCING BIODIVERSITY IN METROPO
Page 125 and 126:
Climate change may also affect ecos
Page 127 and 128:
Box 8.3 The National Reserve System
Page 129 and 130:
Victoria’s Native Vegetation Mana
Page 131 and 132:
Box 9.1 A short history of public l
Page 133 and 134:
9.3 Scope of surplus public land Pu
Page 135 and 136:
9.3.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF SURPLUS PU
Page 137 and 138:
Box 9.3 Summary of Crown land asses
Page 139 and 140:
government purchasers with suffi ci
Page 141:
Biodiversity conservation Chapter 8
Page 144 and 145:
10 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS Public lan
Page 146 and 147:
Regional park Regional parks are se
Page 148 and 149:
Water production areas Water produc
Page 150 and 151:
10.2 Recommendations to enhance the
Page 152 and 153:
Figure 10.1 Proposed additions to K
Page 154 and 155:
Figure 10.2 Proposed additions to B
Page 156 and 157:
Figure 10.3 Proposed Point Cook Coa
Page 158 and 159:
Figure 10.4 Proposed Bandicoot Corn
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 10.5 Ryans Swamp and surroun
Page 162 and 163:
Figure 10.6 Edithvale Wetland Legen
Page 164 and 165:
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ABS BP C
Page 166 and 167:
REFERENCES 1 Department of Infrastr
Page 168 and 169:
80 Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Sch
Page 170 and 171:
177 Parliament of Victoria (2008) S
Page 172 and 173:
APPENDIX 1 COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROU
Page 174 and 175:
APPENDIX 3 HISTORIC PLACES IN METRO
Page 176 and 177:
Kings Domain Resting Place, Melbour
Page 178 and 179:
ID SITE NAME PLACE TYPE Brimbank H0
Page 180 and 181:
ID SITE NAME PLACE TYPE H0932 Retai
Page 182 and 183:
ID SITE NAME PLACE TYPE H1051 Forme
Page 184 and 185:
ID SITE NAME PLACE TYPE H0718 North
Page 186 and 187:
PROTECTED AREA MUNICIPALITY AREA (H
Page 188 and 189:
PROTECTED AREA MUNICIPALITY AREA (H
Page 190 and 191:
Proportion of public open space in
Page 192 and 193:
Public open space ownership within
Page 194 and 195:
Public open space per capita (2006,
Page 196:
Public consultation Land is general
show all

Metropolitan Melbourne Investigation Discussion Paper - Victorian ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?