10.01.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />

6 Workshop Abstracts<br />

presence of A. pyogenes or viral <strong>in</strong>fection. The exotox<strong>in</strong> of A.<br />

pyogenes, pyolys<strong>in</strong> (PLO), causes epithelial and particularly stromal<br />

cell <strong>de</strong>ath. Similarly, BoHV-4 is highly tropic for the endometrium,<br />

caus<strong>in</strong>g a rapid cytopathic effect <strong>in</strong> stromal and then epithelial cells.<br />

This tropism may be because viral replication is activated by<br />

prostagland<strong>in</strong> E 2 , which is constitutively secreted by the stromal cells.<br />

Further exploration of the molecular mechanism of microbial<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection and immunity will lead to greater un<strong>de</strong>rstand<strong>in</strong>g of how<br />

uter<strong>in</strong>e disease impacts fertility, and provi<strong>de</strong> <strong>in</strong>sights to help <strong>de</strong>velop<br />

new therapeutic approaches.<br />

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and BBSRC.<br />

Workshop 02 - Factors Affect<strong>in</strong>g Pregnancy Rates <strong>in</strong><br />

Estrus Synchronization Programs <strong>in</strong> Beef Heifers<br />

Mo<strong>de</strong>rator: Gabriel Bo (Argent<strong>in</strong>a)<br />

WS02-1<br />

Reproductive management of cycl<strong>in</strong>g and non-cycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bos taurus beef heifers <strong>in</strong> the USA<br />

Lamb, G<br />

North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna<br />

Estrus synchronization and artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation (AI) are<br />

reproductive management tools that have been available to beef<br />

producers for over 30 years. Synchronization of the estrous cycle has<br />

the potential to shorten the calv<strong>in</strong>g season, <strong>in</strong>crease calf uniformity,<br />

and enhance the possibilities for utiliz<strong>in</strong>g AI. Artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

allows producers the opportunity to <strong>in</strong>fuse superior genetics <strong>in</strong>to their<br />

operations at costs far below the cost of purchas<strong>in</strong>g a herd sire of<br />

similar standards. These tools rema<strong>in</strong> the most important and wi<strong>de</strong>ly<br />

applicable reproductive biotechnologies available for beef cattle<br />

operations <strong>in</strong> the USA. However, beef producers have been slow to<br />

utilize or adopt these technologies <strong>in</strong>to their production systems.<br />

Several factors, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g early stages of <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />

estrus synchronization programs, contributed to the poor adoption<br />

rates. Initial programs failed to address the primary obstacle <strong>in</strong><br />

synchronization of estrus, which was to overcome the late onset of<br />

puberty <strong>in</strong> heifers. Additionally, these programs failed to manage the<br />

tim<strong>in</strong>g of ovulation precisely, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more days over which<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection of estrus was necessary. This ultimately preclu<strong>de</strong>d fixedtime<br />

AI (FTAI) with acceptable pregnancy rates. More recent<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopments focused on the control of both the corpus luteum and<br />

follicle waves <strong>in</strong> convenient and economical protocols to synchronize<br />

the tim<strong>in</strong>g of ovulation, facilitat<strong>in</strong>g FTAI. This new generation of<br />

estrus synchronization protocols uses two strategies which are key<br />

factors for implementation by producers because they: 1) m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

the number and frequency of handl<strong>in</strong>g cattle; and 2) elim<strong>in</strong>ate the<br />

need for <strong>de</strong>tection of estrus by employ<strong>in</strong>g FTAI. However, <strong>de</strong>velop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

FTAI protocols <strong>in</strong> beef heifers has not been straightforward because<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>ability to synchronize follicular waves reliably with<br />

gonadotroph<strong>in</strong>-releas<strong>in</strong>g hormone (GnRH). For example, after an<br />

<strong>in</strong>jection of GnRH at random stages of the estrous cycle, 60 to 90% of<br />

postpartum cows ovulated; whereas, only 48 to 60% of beef and dairy<br />

heifers ovulated <strong>in</strong> response to the same treatment. Therefore, most<br />

recent research cont<strong>in</strong>ues to focus on <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g onset of puberty <strong>in</strong><br />

noncycl<strong>in</strong>g heifers and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g synchrony of ovulation by<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g progest<strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>vices <strong>in</strong> GnRH-based protocols to facilitate<br />

FTAI and improve fertility <strong>in</strong> heifers.<br />

WS02-2<br />

Why are pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI generally lower<br />

<strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus than Bos taurus cattle<br />

McGowan, M*; Butler,S; Phillips, N<br />

School of Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,<br />

Australia<br />

The recent <strong>de</strong>velopments <strong>in</strong> quantitative and molecular genetics which<br />

have led to improvements <strong>in</strong> our ability to select for a range of<br />

important production traits <strong>in</strong> beef cattle (carcass quality, fertility,<br />

health & welfare), have <strong>in</strong>creased the need to <strong>de</strong>velop practical and<br />

effective programs which efficiently dissem<strong>in</strong>ate selected genetics. As<br />

the major graz<strong>in</strong>g rangelands for beef cattle are located <strong>in</strong> tropical and<br />

subtropical regions, <strong>de</strong>velopment of artificial breed<strong>in</strong>g programs<br />

which focus on maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive outcome <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus<br />

cattle, the genotypes most suited to these environments, is essential.<br />

However, most of the treatment protocols for synchronization of<br />

oestrus have been <strong>de</strong>veloped for Bos taurus cattle with the assumption<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g that usage <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cattle will result <strong>in</strong> similar outcomes.<br />

Although some publications report similar reproductive outcomes,<br />

marked, frequently unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed variation <strong>in</strong> response to hormonal<br />

treatments to synchronise oestrus, cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be important factors<br />

limit<strong>in</strong>g the wi<strong>de</strong>spread usage of this technology <strong>in</strong> extensively<br />

managed Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus herds. Progest<strong>in</strong> and progesterone implants<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with prostagland<strong>in</strong> F2α, oestrogen and gondaotroph<strong>in</strong><br />

treatments are most commonly used for fixed-time AI (FTAI) of Bos<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicus females. The reported responses to these treatments <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of animals <strong>de</strong>tected <strong>in</strong> oestrus between 48 to 72 h after implant<br />

removal, and animals diagnosed pregnant to FTAI vary consi<strong>de</strong>rably<br />

(44 to 98% and 37 to 62%, respectively). A series of recently<br />

completed studies conducted <strong>in</strong> northern Australia have shed some<br />

light on potential causes of the observed variation <strong>in</strong> response of Bos<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicus heifers. When 300 cycl<strong>in</strong>g disease-free Brahman heifers<br />

weigh<strong>in</strong>g 289±30 kg, were randomly assigned to be treated with<br />

oestradiol benzoate (ODB) and <strong>in</strong>travag<strong>in</strong>al implants (8 day <strong>in</strong>sertion)<br />

vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> progesterone content (0.78g, 1.56g, 1.9g) followed by<br />

ODB treatment (Day 9) and FTAI 48 to 54 hours after implant<br />

removal, the overall pregnancy rate was 35%. However, the pre- and<br />

post-AI progesterone profiles of a random samples of 10 heifers from<br />

each group <strong>in</strong>dicated that 32% (n=30) had plasma progesterone<br />

concentrations of 1ng/ml. Consi<strong>de</strong>ration should be given to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the role of hormonal treatments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g suboptimal<br />

preovulatory follicular and corpus luteum <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus<br />

cattle.<br />

WS02-3<br />

Fixed-time artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> cycl<strong>in</strong>g and noncycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus beef heifers<br />

Baruselli, PS 1 *; Sales, JNS 1 ; Crepaldi, GA 1 ; Sá Filho, MF 2 ; Carvalho, JBP 3 ;<br />

Bo, GA 4<br />

1Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Department, FMVZ/USP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil;<br />

2FIRMASA-IATF, Campo Gran<strong>de</strong>-MS, Brazil; 3 Vale do Paraíba Regional<br />

Station-Apta, Av. Prof. Manoel Cesar Ribeiro, No. 320, Caixa Postal 7,<br />

P<strong>in</strong>damonhangaba, SP, Brazil; 4 Instituto <strong>de</strong> Reproducción Animal Córdoba,<br />

J.L. <strong>de</strong> Cabrera 106, X5000GVD Córdoba, Argent<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Fixed-time artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation (FTAI) protocols have generally<br />

yiel<strong>de</strong>d poor results <strong>in</strong> B. <strong>in</strong>dicus heifers. It was hypothesized that<br />

follicular growth <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus heifers might be suppressed by<br />

circulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone concentrations dur<strong>in</strong>g the treatment protocol.<br />

It is speculated that lower steroid hormone clearance rates <strong>in</strong> Bos<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicus cattle may account for the higher circulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone<br />

concentrations dur<strong>in</strong>g progesterone treatment result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> reduced LH<br />

pulsatility and follicular growth rates. A series of experiments were<br />

<strong>de</strong>signed to <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>e if synchronization of follicle wave emergence<br />

and ovulation with estrogen and subluteal progesterone concentrations<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g growth of the ovulatory follicle would improve the synchrony<br />

of ovulation and pregnancy rates follow<strong>in</strong>g FTAI. Treatment with<br />

PGF at the start of progest<strong>in</strong> treatment resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>creased<br />

circulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone concentrations and <strong>in</strong>creased the follicular<br />

growth rates, dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle diameters and ovulation rates. In<br />

comparison to CIDR, norgestomet ear implants resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle growth rates lead<strong>in</strong>g to ovulatory follicles with<br />

larger diameters. Dose and estradiol ester were important factors <strong>in</strong><br />

synchroniz<strong>in</strong>g follicle wave emergence. A dose of 2.5 or 5 mg<br />

estradiol valerate resulted <strong>in</strong> a longer and more variable <strong>in</strong>terval from<br />

treatment to follicular wave emergence than 2 mg of estradiol<br />

benzoate (EB), which affected preovulatory dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle size

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!