Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />
6 Workshop Abstracts<br />
presence of A. pyogenes or viral <strong>in</strong>fection. The exotox<strong>in</strong> of A.<br />
pyogenes, pyolys<strong>in</strong> (PLO), causes epithelial and particularly stromal<br />
cell <strong>de</strong>ath. Similarly, BoHV-4 is highly tropic for the endometrium,<br />
caus<strong>in</strong>g a rapid cytopathic effect <strong>in</strong> stromal and then epithelial cells.<br />
This tropism may be because viral replication is activated by<br />
prostagland<strong>in</strong> E 2 , which is constitutively secreted by the stromal cells.<br />
Further exploration of the molecular mechanism of microbial<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection and immunity will lead to greater un<strong>de</strong>rstand<strong>in</strong>g of how<br />
uter<strong>in</strong>e disease impacts fertility, and provi<strong>de</strong> <strong>in</strong>sights to help <strong>de</strong>velop<br />
new therapeutic approaches.<br />
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and BBSRC.<br />
Workshop 02 - Factors Affect<strong>in</strong>g Pregnancy Rates <strong>in</strong><br />
Estrus Synchronization Programs <strong>in</strong> Beef Heifers<br />
Mo<strong>de</strong>rator: Gabriel Bo (Argent<strong>in</strong>a)<br />
WS02-1<br />
Reproductive management of cycl<strong>in</strong>g and non-cycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bos taurus beef heifers <strong>in</strong> the USA<br />
Lamb, G<br />
North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna<br />
Estrus synchronization and artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation (AI) are<br />
reproductive management tools that have been available to beef<br />
producers for over 30 years. Synchronization of the estrous cycle has<br />
the potential to shorten the calv<strong>in</strong>g season, <strong>in</strong>crease calf uniformity,<br />
and enhance the possibilities for utiliz<strong>in</strong>g AI. Artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
allows producers the opportunity to <strong>in</strong>fuse superior genetics <strong>in</strong>to their<br />
operations at costs far below the cost of purchas<strong>in</strong>g a herd sire of<br />
similar standards. These tools rema<strong>in</strong> the most important and wi<strong>de</strong>ly<br />
applicable reproductive biotechnologies available for beef cattle<br />
operations <strong>in</strong> the USA. However, beef producers have been slow to<br />
utilize or adopt these technologies <strong>in</strong>to their production systems.<br />
Several factors, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g early stages of <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />
estrus synchronization programs, contributed to the poor adoption<br />
rates. Initial programs failed to address the primary obstacle <strong>in</strong><br />
synchronization of estrus, which was to overcome the late onset of<br />
puberty <strong>in</strong> heifers. Additionally, these programs failed to manage the<br />
tim<strong>in</strong>g of ovulation precisely, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more days over which<br />
<strong>de</strong>tection of estrus was necessary. This ultimately preclu<strong>de</strong>d fixedtime<br />
AI (FTAI) with acceptable pregnancy rates. More recent<br />
<strong>de</strong>velopments focused on the control of both the corpus luteum and<br />
follicle waves <strong>in</strong> convenient and economical protocols to synchronize<br />
the tim<strong>in</strong>g of ovulation, facilitat<strong>in</strong>g FTAI. This new generation of<br />
estrus synchronization protocols uses two strategies which are key<br />
factors for implementation by producers because they: 1) m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />
the number and frequency of handl<strong>in</strong>g cattle; and 2) elim<strong>in</strong>ate the<br />
need for <strong>de</strong>tection of estrus by employ<strong>in</strong>g FTAI. However, <strong>de</strong>velop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
FTAI protocols <strong>in</strong> beef heifers has not been straightforward because<br />
of the <strong>in</strong>ability to synchronize follicular waves reliably with<br />
gonadotroph<strong>in</strong>-releas<strong>in</strong>g hormone (GnRH). For example, after an<br />
<strong>in</strong>jection of GnRH at random stages of the estrous cycle, 60 to 90% of<br />
postpartum cows ovulated; whereas, only 48 to 60% of beef and dairy<br />
heifers ovulated <strong>in</strong> response to the same treatment. Therefore, most<br />
recent research cont<strong>in</strong>ues to focus on <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g onset of puberty <strong>in</strong><br />
noncycl<strong>in</strong>g heifers and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g synchrony of ovulation by<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g progest<strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>vices <strong>in</strong> GnRH-based protocols to facilitate<br />
FTAI and improve fertility <strong>in</strong> heifers.<br />
WS02-2<br />
Why are pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI generally lower<br />
<strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus than Bos taurus cattle<br />
McGowan, M*; Butler,S; Phillips, N<br />
School of Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,<br />
Australia<br />
The recent <strong>de</strong>velopments <strong>in</strong> quantitative and molecular genetics which<br />
have led to improvements <strong>in</strong> our ability to select for a range of<br />
important production traits <strong>in</strong> beef cattle (carcass quality, fertility,<br />
health & welfare), have <strong>in</strong>creased the need to <strong>de</strong>velop practical and<br />
effective programs which efficiently dissem<strong>in</strong>ate selected genetics. As<br />
the major graz<strong>in</strong>g rangelands for beef cattle are located <strong>in</strong> tropical and<br />
subtropical regions, <strong>de</strong>velopment of artificial breed<strong>in</strong>g programs<br />
which focus on maximiz<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive outcome <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus<br />
cattle, the genotypes most suited to these environments, is essential.<br />
However, most of the treatment protocols for synchronization of<br />
oestrus have been <strong>de</strong>veloped for Bos taurus cattle with the assumption<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g that usage <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cattle will result <strong>in</strong> similar outcomes.<br />
Although some publications report similar reproductive outcomes,<br />
marked, frequently unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed variation <strong>in</strong> response to hormonal<br />
treatments to synchronise oestrus, cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be important factors<br />
limit<strong>in</strong>g the wi<strong>de</strong>spread usage of this technology <strong>in</strong> extensively<br />
managed Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus herds. Progest<strong>in</strong> and progesterone implants<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed with prostagland<strong>in</strong> F2α, oestrogen and gondaotroph<strong>in</strong><br />
treatments are most commonly used for fixed-time AI (FTAI) of Bos<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicus females. The reported responses to these treatments <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
of animals <strong>de</strong>tected <strong>in</strong> oestrus between 48 to 72 h after implant<br />
removal, and animals diagnosed pregnant to FTAI vary consi<strong>de</strong>rably<br />
(44 to 98% and 37 to 62%, respectively). A series of recently<br />
completed studies conducted <strong>in</strong> northern Australia have shed some<br />
light on potential causes of the observed variation <strong>in</strong> response of Bos<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicus heifers. When 300 cycl<strong>in</strong>g disease-free Brahman heifers<br />
weigh<strong>in</strong>g 289±30 kg, were randomly assigned to be treated with<br />
oestradiol benzoate (ODB) and <strong>in</strong>travag<strong>in</strong>al implants (8 day <strong>in</strong>sertion)<br />
vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> progesterone content (0.78g, 1.56g, 1.9g) followed by<br />
ODB treatment (Day 9) and FTAI 48 to 54 hours after implant<br />
removal, the overall pregnancy rate was 35%. However, the pre- and<br />
post-AI progesterone profiles of a random samples of 10 heifers from<br />
each group <strong>in</strong>dicated that 32% (n=30) had plasma progesterone<br />
concentrations of 1ng/ml. Consi<strong>de</strong>ration should be given to<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the role of hormonal treatments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g suboptimal<br />
preovulatory follicular and corpus luteum <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus<br />
cattle.<br />
WS02-3<br />
Fixed-time artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> cycl<strong>in</strong>g and noncycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus beef heifers<br />
Baruselli, PS 1 *; Sales, JNS 1 ; Crepaldi, GA 1 ; Sá Filho, MF 2 ; Carvalho, JBP 3 ;<br />
Bo, GA 4<br />
1Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Department, FMVZ/USP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil;<br />
2FIRMASA-IATF, Campo Gran<strong>de</strong>-MS, Brazil; 3 Vale do Paraíba Regional<br />
Station-Apta, Av. Prof. Manoel Cesar Ribeiro, No. 320, Caixa Postal 7,<br />
P<strong>in</strong>damonhangaba, SP, Brazil; 4 Instituto <strong>de</strong> Reproducción Animal Córdoba,<br />
J.L. <strong>de</strong> Cabrera 106, X5000GVD Córdoba, Argent<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Fixed-time artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation (FTAI) protocols have generally<br />
yiel<strong>de</strong>d poor results <strong>in</strong> B. <strong>in</strong>dicus heifers. It was hypothesized that<br />
follicular growth <strong>in</strong> Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus heifers might be suppressed by<br />
circulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone concentrations dur<strong>in</strong>g the treatment protocol.<br />
It is speculated that lower steroid hormone clearance rates <strong>in</strong> Bos<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicus cattle may account for the higher circulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone<br />
concentrations dur<strong>in</strong>g progesterone treatment result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> reduced LH<br />
pulsatility and follicular growth rates. A series of experiments were<br />
<strong>de</strong>signed to <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>e if synchronization of follicle wave emergence<br />
and ovulation with estrogen and subluteal progesterone concentrations<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g growth of the ovulatory follicle would improve the synchrony<br />
of ovulation and pregnancy rates follow<strong>in</strong>g FTAI. Treatment with<br />
PGF at the start of progest<strong>in</strong> treatment resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>creased<br />
circulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone concentrations and <strong>in</strong>creased the follicular<br />
growth rates, dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle diameters and ovulation rates. In<br />
comparison to CIDR, norgestomet ear implants resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle growth rates lead<strong>in</strong>g to ovulatory follicles with<br />
larger diameters. Dose and estradiol ester were important factors <strong>in</strong><br />
synchroniz<strong>in</strong>g follicle wave emergence. A dose of 2.5 or 5 mg<br />
estradiol valerate resulted <strong>in</strong> a longer and more variable <strong>in</strong>terval from<br />
treatment to follicular wave emergence than 2 mg of estradiol<br />
benzoate (EB), which affected preovulatory dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle size