10.01.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />

Poster Abstracts 41<br />

analogous one of the GnRH, was beneficial for resolution of this<br />

pathology.<br />

P040<br />

Bull and sire effect for the pregnancy rate and embryonic<br />

loss <strong>in</strong> dairy cow<br />

Gabor, G 1 *, Balogh, OG 1 , Abonyi-Toth, Zs 2 , Toth, F 1 and Sasser, RG 3,4<br />

1Department of Cattle Breed<strong>in</strong>g Research Institute for Animal Breed<strong>in</strong>g, H-<br />

2053 Herceghalom, Hungary, 2 SzIE-AOTK, H-1074 Budapest, Hungary,<br />

3Department of Animal and Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Science, University of Idaho and<br />

4BioTrack<strong>in</strong>g LLC, 105 E. 2nd, Moscow, ID, USA<br />

Introduction The ma<strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g factors of reproductive performance<br />

<strong>in</strong> dairies are pregnancy rate (PR) (<strong>in</strong>fluenced by embryonic loss<br />

(EL)) and number of services per conception (NSC). Between 1st<br />

January and 31st October 2007 our laboratory checked early<br />

pregnancies of approximately 11200 AI’s. That required collect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data from cows of 13 dairies. PR and NSC seemed to be affected by<br />

the AI sire is why data were collected on the AI sires on the farm too.<br />

We also recor<strong>de</strong>d ovarian treatments of cows before AI, pregnancy<br />

rates and embryonic losses <strong>in</strong> cows. Our ma<strong>in</strong> goal was to check sire<br />

and bull effect for PR and EL. Based on the above mentioned data<br />

statistical analyses were carried out to f<strong>in</strong>d out <strong>in</strong>teractions between<br />

PR and EL with other factors (farm, ovarian treatment, age, number of<br />

AI).<br />

Materials and methods Blood samples were collected once a week,<br />

30-36 days post <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation (PI), and sent to the laboratory by<br />

overnight mail. Data about the cow and AI were sent via email.<br />

BioPRYN ® ELISA test (BioTrack<strong>in</strong>g, Moscow, ID, US) was run for<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection of early pregnancy. All open cows and pregnant cows which<br />

had low optical <strong>de</strong>nsity values (close to the cutoff) dur<strong>in</strong>g the BioPryn<br />

test were assayed for serum P4 concentration. P4 was checked by an<br />

ELISA test (QuantiCheck, Veter<strong>in</strong>org, Budapest). Re-check of<br />

pregnancy status was done 60-90 days PI by rectal palpation.<br />

Differences between the early and 60-90 days pregnancy <strong>de</strong>tection<br />

were called late loss. Pearson's Chi-squared test and logistic<br />

regression was used to f<strong>in</strong>d the association among the data. Data from<br />

AI bulls (AIB) and the bull’s sires (BS) which had more than 100<br />

AI’s, and fathers of cows (FC) whose daughters had more than 100<br />

AI’s were used for statistical analysis.<br />

Results and discussion Significant correlation (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!