Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />
40 Poster Abstracts<br />
P037<br />
Treatment of Uter<strong>in</strong>e Infections <strong>in</strong> Non Cycl<strong>in</strong>g Cows with<br />
Cloprostenol<br />
Fernan<strong>de</strong>s, C 1-2 *; Figueiredo, A 1-2 ; Alves, B 2 ; Oliveira, E 2 ; Viana, J 4 , Gioso, M<br />
1; Oba, E 4<br />
1Faculty of Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e, University of Alfenas, Brazil; 2 Biotran LTDA,<br />
Brazil; 3 Embrapa-Gado <strong>de</strong> Leite, Brazil; 4 FMVZ-Unesp – Botucatu, Brazil<br />
Recent f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs on the mechanisms of uter<strong>in</strong>e <strong>de</strong>fense show the<br />
eicosanoids as the ma<strong>in</strong> substances that modulate this activity. This<br />
observation open an excellent chance for the treatment of uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>in</strong>fections, once the PGF2α and its analogous have activity on the<br />
production of these substances <strong>in</strong> the uterus. Moreover, they would<br />
provoke reduction <strong>in</strong> the progesterone (P4). P4 produces substances<br />
that <strong>in</strong>hibit the uter<strong>in</strong>e <strong>de</strong>fense mechanisms and partially block the<br />
production of eicosanoids. The application of PGF analogous was<br />
capable of stimulat<strong>in</strong>g the PGF2 and other related substances<br />
production <strong>in</strong> the uterus, as Leucotriene B4, which activate some<br />
leucocitary functions, associated to the neutrophile, the most<br />
important cell <strong>in</strong> the uterus <strong>de</strong>fense mechanism. The aims of this<br />
study were to evaluate and compare the efficiency of protocols of<br />
Cloprostenol adm<strong>in</strong>istration for the treatment of cl<strong>in</strong>ical endometritis<br />
<strong>in</strong> dairy cows (Holste<strong>in</strong>) without luteal ovarian activity. Cows of six<br />
herds were used, all present<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical endometritis, associated with a<br />
<strong>in</strong>voluted uterus (30-118 days post-partum) and absence of corpus<br />
luteum. The diagnosis and classification of the endometritis was based<br />
on abnormal uter<strong>in</strong>e discharge on vag<strong>in</strong>oscopic exam<strong>in</strong>ation. In<br />
accordance with the <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>de</strong>gree (mucopurulent or purulent) the<br />
animals had been randomized <strong>in</strong> four groups, and received IM<br />
treatments: T1 (n=22): 2ml of sal<strong>in</strong>e solution; T2 (n=41): only one<br />
dose of 0.530mg of Cloprostenol (2ml Cios<strong>in</strong> Scher<strong>in</strong>g Plough-<br />
Brazil); T3 (n=43): 2 doses of 0.530mg of Cloprostenol 24 hours apart<br />
and T4 (n=40): 2 doses 0.530mg of Cloprostenol with <strong>in</strong>terval of 48<br />
hours. The cows were evaluated by vag<strong>in</strong>oscopy 20 to 30 days later.<br />
The efficiency between the treatments was compared by the χ2 test.<br />
There was no herd effect <strong>in</strong> treatment results. The efficiency was<br />
18.18a; 39.02b, 71.42c and 47.50%b for groups T1, T2, T3 and T4,<br />
respectively. The treatment with better efficiency was T3, (P5 mm), and number of follicles ≥4 mm on D7 were<br />
analyzed by logistic regression us<strong>in</strong>g Glimmix procedure. Daily size<br />
of follicles was analyzed by MIXED procedure. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
treatment with EB did not <strong>de</strong>lay emergence of the follicular wave<br />
(1.40±0.24 vs. 1.40±0.24 days, P=1.00) or alter largest follicle size at<br />
any day post-treatment. In addition, there was no difference between<br />
control and EB-treated cows <strong>in</strong> growth rate of the largest follicle from<br />
D1 to D7 (1.50±0.05 vs. 1.21±0.16 mm/d; P=0.34) or D4 to D7<br />
(1.20±0.17 vs. 1.40±0.16 mm/d; P=0.53); but, EB <strong>de</strong>creased growth<br />
of the largest follicle from D1 to D4 (1.25±0.15 vs. 0.83±0.13 mm/d;<br />
P=0.03). Unexpectedly, EB treatment <strong>in</strong>creased number of follicles<br />
≥4mm on Days 5, 6, or 7 (D7; Control=7.2±0.8 vs. EB=21.2±5.3<br />
follicles; P=0.03). Thus, a dose of EB that normally <strong>de</strong>lays follicular<br />
wave emergence by ~4d was not effective <strong>in</strong> <strong>de</strong>lay<strong>in</strong>g emergence or<br />
growth of the dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle after follicular aspiration perhaps due<br />
to absence of follicular products such as <strong>in</strong>hib<strong>in</strong>. However, EB<br />
treatment follow<strong>in</strong>g follicular aspiration produced a dramatic <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> the numbers of small follicles even <strong>in</strong> the presence of a dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
follicle.<br />
P039<br />
Ovarian Cysts Treatment with Fertirel<strong>in</strong> Associated or not<br />
to Cloprostenol<br />
Fernan<strong>de</strong>s, C 1-2 ; Figueiredo, A 1-2 *; Alves, B 2 ; Oliveira, E 2 ; Viana, J 4 , Gioso,<br />
M 1 ; Oba, E 4<br />
1Faculty of Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e, University of Alfenas, Brazil; 2 Biotran LTDA,<br />
Brazil; 3 Embrapa-Gado <strong>de</strong> Leite, Brazil; 4 FMVZ-Unesp – Botucatu, Brazil<br />
The ovarian cysts was a of high occurrence pathology and for causes<br />
significant alterations <strong>in</strong> the reproductive performance of the animals.<br />
Its treatment must be effective, <strong>in</strong> the direction to m<strong>in</strong>imize the<br />
reproductive losses. The result of the successful treatment would be<br />
the regression of the cystic structure and formation of a luteal mass<br />
(corpus luteum) and the fast return to the cyclical luteal ovarian<br />
activity and manifestation of regular estrous cycles. Braun et al.<br />
(2000) shows consi<strong>de</strong>rable occurrence of cystic structures with<br />
partially lute<strong>in</strong>ized wall <strong>in</strong> dairy cows, and cite the possibility of<br />
beneficial effect <strong>in</strong> the application of prostagland<strong>in</strong>s associated to the<br />
analogous ones of the GnRH for treatment. The objective of this study<br />
was to evaluate and to compare the efficiency of the Fertirel<strong>in</strong> Acetate<br />
<strong>in</strong> association or not with the Cloprostenol for treatment of ovarian<br />
cysts <strong>in</strong> dairy cows. 133 holste<strong>in</strong> cows between 30 and 90 days postpartum<br />
had been used <strong>in</strong> four Farms. The cyst diagnosis was ma<strong>de</strong> by<br />
ultrasonography (Esaote-Falco), consi<strong>de</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g as cyst a anecoic<br />
structure above of 20mm beyond the absence of luteal mass <strong>in</strong> the two<br />
ovaries. The animals had been randomized <strong>in</strong>to two groups that had<br />
received the follow<strong>in</strong>g treatments, by IM way <strong>in</strong> only dose: G1<br />
(n=51): 0,1mg of Fertirel<strong>in</strong> Acetate (Fertigen Scher<strong>in</strong>g Plough-<br />
Brazil); G2 (n=49): 0,1mg of Fertirel<strong>in</strong> Acetate + 0,530mg of<br />
Cloprostenol (Cios<strong>in</strong> Scher<strong>in</strong>g Plough-Brazil) at the same time,<br />
and G3 (n=35): Control Group (non treated). All the animals aga<strong>in</strong><br />
had been evaluated of 12 the 18 days later. The treatment was<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>red efficient where <strong>in</strong> the second ultrasonography evaluation it<br />
was <strong>de</strong>tected the absence of the cystic structure and presence of luteal<br />
mass. The efficiency of the treatments was evaluated by the χ2 test.<br />
The results of the two treatments had been 54.91; 81.63 and 17.14%,<br />
for the groups G1; G2 and G3, respectively (P