10.01.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />

Poster Abstracts 29<br />

hyperimmune serum were produced aga<strong>in</strong>st Arcanobacterium<br />

pyogenes and E. coli that were isolated <strong>in</strong> Iranian dairy farms. Cows<br />

<strong>in</strong> group oxytetracycl<strong>in</strong>e (n=39) were treated with one <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>fusion of 5gr oxytetracycl<strong>in</strong>e (10%). Cows that did not show any<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of postpartum endometritis were regar<strong>de</strong>d as healthy<br />

control group (HC, n =91). In group hyperimmunue serum and<br />

oxytetracycl<strong>in</strong>e (OTC), all cows were re-exam<strong>in</strong>ed 39–49 DIM. In<br />

group hyperimmunue serum and OTC, cows were re-treated with<br />

hyperimmunue serum if signs of endometritis were found. Cure rate<br />

after the first treatment, <strong>de</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ed as the absence of vag<strong>in</strong>al discharge at<br />

the re-exam<strong>in</strong>ations, was 64.3 % and 61.5% <strong>in</strong> groups hyperimmunue<br />

Serum and OTC (P > 0.05). Reproductive performance measures<br />

showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two<br />

treatment groups. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05)<br />

Service rate between treatments groups hyperimmunue Serum and<br />

OTC, compared to HC. Conception rates to all services and<br />

percentages of cows pregnant by 180 DIM were 90.48, 86.49 and<br />

92.13 <strong>in</strong> groups hyperimmunue Serum, OTC and HC, respectively (P<br />

> 0.05). In both treatment groups, cure rate and reproductive<br />

performance measures were better for cows categorized E1 or E2,<br />

than for cows categorized E3 but the differences were not significant.<br />

Conception rate to all services for cows with endometritis (category<br />

E1, E2 and E3) was 52.94 <strong>in</strong> group hyperimmunue Serum and 57.14<br />

<strong>in</strong> group OTC compared 66.67 <strong>in</strong> HC (P > 0.05). The results of this<br />

field trial suggest that hyperimmunue serum could be the alternative<br />

no antibiotic treatment of choice for postpartum endometritis <strong>in</strong> dairy<br />

cattle.<br />

P005<br />

GnRH-<strong>in</strong>duced LH and ovulatory responses <strong>in</strong> dairy<br />

heifers dur<strong>in</strong>g diestrus and proestrus<br />

Ambrose, DJ 1 *, Colazo, MG 1 , Bhuwanee, A 2 , Kumpula, B 2 , Lamont, AL 2 ,<br />

Salmon, F 2 , Suddaby, P 2 , Terletski, S 2<br />

1Agriculture Research Division, Alberta Agriculture and Food, Canada;<br />

2Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Canada<br />

The objective was to <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>e whether pituitary LH response to<br />

GnRH <strong>in</strong> Holste<strong>in</strong> heifers differed between diestrous and proestrous<br />

stages of the estrous cycle. Fifteen postpuberal heifers (13 to 14 mo of<br />

age, 404 to 479 kg body weight) were given 25 mg of d<strong>in</strong>oprost<br />

trometham<strong>in</strong>e (PGF; Lutalyse, Pfizer Animal Health) im. Estrus<br />

<strong>de</strong>tection was done twice daily for 4 d after PGF treatment and<br />

ovulation (Day 0) confirmed by ultrasonography. On Day (Mean ±<br />

SE) 8.5 ± 0.6 after ovulation, 100 µg of gonadorel<strong>in</strong> acetate (GnRH;<br />

Fertil<strong>in</strong>e, Vetoqu<strong>in</strong>ol Canada Inc.) was given im to all heifers<br />

(Diestrous stage treatment). Blood samples (n=15/heifer; from 15 m<strong>in</strong><br />

before to 8 h after GnRH) were collected and plasma analyzed for LH<br />

concentration. One blood sample taken prior to GnRH was analyzed<br />

for progesterone. Ovulation was <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed by ultrasonography 48 h<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g GnRH treatment and heifers received an <strong>in</strong>travag<strong>in</strong>al<br />

progesterone (P4; 1.9 g) <strong>in</strong>sert (CIDR; Pfizer Animal Health) for 7 d,<br />

with PGF adm<strong>in</strong>istered at CIDR removal. Twenty-four h after CIDR<br />

removal (Day 15.9 ± 0.6), GnRH was given im (Proestrous stage<br />

treatment). Ovulatory response, P4 and LH concentrations were<br />

<strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>in</strong> Diestrus. Data were analyzed by Proc MIXED,<br />

ANOVA, and Chi-square. Two heifers did not respond to PGF<br />

treatment; both were exclu<strong>de</strong>d from the study. Plasma P4<br />

concentration (ng/mL) at GnRH treatment was higher (P < 0.01) <strong>in</strong><br />

heifers treated dur<strong>in</strong>g diestrus (5.7 ± 0.7) than dur<strong>in</strong>g proestrus (1.0 ±<br />

0.2). The ovulatory response to GnRH treatment was higher dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

proestrus than diestrus (P < 0.02; 61.5 vs 15.4%). GnRH-<strong>in</strong>duced LH<br />

peak was lower (P < 0.04; 5.7 ± 0.8 vs 13.6 ± 3.0 ng/mL) and of<br />

shorter duration (P < 0.01; 5.4 ± 0.3 vs 6.8 ± 0.3 h) <strong>in</strong> heifers treated<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g diestrus than dur<strong>in</strong>g proestrus. Regardless of the stage of the<br />

estrous cycle at treatment, heifers that ovulated after GnRH had a<br />

significantly longer <strong>in</strong>terval from GnRH treatment to LH peak than<br />

those that did not ovulate (P < 0.01; 1.7 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0.1 h).<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> heifers treated with GnRH dur<strong>in</strong>g proestrus, LH<br />

concentrations did not differ (P = 0.60) between those that ovulated<br />

and those that did not. In conclusion, heifers treated with GnRH<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g diestrus had lower peak LH concentrations, <strong>de</strong>layed atta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

of LH peak, shorter duration of elevated LH concentrations, and lower<br />

ovulatory responses than those treated dur<strong>in</strong>g proestrus.<br />

P006<br />

The Effect of Add<strong>in</strong>g Cholesterol, Vitam<strong>in</strong> A, Cod Liver or<br />

Flax Oil Loa<strong>de</strong>d Cyclo<strong>de</strong>xtr<strong>in</strong> on Bull Sperm Cryosurvival<br />

Amorim, EAM 1,2 *, Graham, J 2 , Spizziri, B 2 , Meyers, M 2 , Amorim, LS 1,2 , Torres,<br />

CAA 1<br />

1Department of Animal Science, Fe<strong>de</strong>ral University of Vicosa, Brazil;<br />

2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, USA<br />

Introduction Damage occurr<strong>in</strong>g to spermatozoa dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cryopreservation results <strong>in</strong> a loss of motile cells and cells that are<br />

functionally normal, compared to fresh sperm samples. Treat<strong>in</strong>g bull<br />

sperm with cholesterol-loa<strong>de</strong>d cyclo<strong>de</strong>xtr<strong>in</strong>s (CLCs) prior to<br />

cryopreservation results <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased sperm cryosurvival, however,<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g cholesterol to bull sperm membranes alters their ability to<br />

capacitate <strong>in</strong> vitro. This study compared the effect of add<strong>in</strong>g four<br />

compounds, which should <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>to and <strong>in</strong>crease membrane<br />

fluidity at low temperatures thereby <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g cryosurvival.<br />

Method Twenty-five ejaculates from four bulls were collected us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

artificial vag<strong>in</strong>a and exten<strong>de</strong>d with Tris, and then sub-divi<strong>de</strong>d <strong>in</strong>to 11<br />

treatments: No additive (negative control); 1.5 mg CLC/120 million<br />

sperm (positive control); and 0.75 mg, 1.5 mg and 3.0 mg/120 million<br />

sperm of cyclo<strong>de</strong>xtr<strong>in</strong> pre-loa<strong>de</strong>d with vitam<strong>in</strong> A or Cod Liver oil or<br />

Flax oil. Methyl-β-cyclo<strong>de</strong>xtr<strong>in</strong> was preloa<strong>de</strong>d with cholesterol as<br />

<strong>de</strong>scribed by Purdy and Graham (2004). Spermatozoa were <strong>in</strong>cubated<br />

for 15 m<strong>in</strong> at 22 o C. Then, samples were diluted 1:1 (v:v) <strong>in</strong> Tris with<br />

20% Egg Yolk (EY) and cooled to 5 o C. After dilution 1:1 (v:v) with<br />

Tris conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10% EY and 16% glycerol, samples were allowed to<br />

equilibrate for 15 m<strong>in</strong> before packag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to 0.5 ml straws, freez<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

static liquid nitrogen vapor (4.5 cm above the liquid nitrogen) for 20<br />

m<strong>in</strong> and plung<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to liquid nitrogen for storage. Straws were thawed<br />

<strong>in</strong> a water bath at 37ºC for 30 sec and the percentages of total motile<br />

<strong>in</strong> each sample were <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g a computer-assisted sperm<br />

analysis (Hamilton Thorne Motility Analyser).<br />

Results The percentages of motile total sperm cells were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

after thaw<strong>in</strong>g for bull sperm treated with CLC (45%) compared to all<br />

other treatments (26-41%; P0.05).<br />

Conclusion Therefore, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g membrane cholesterol levels by<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g CLCs to bull sperm, prior to freez<strong>in</strong>g, is a simple technology<br />

that improved cell cryosurvival, whereas treatments with<br />

cyclo<strong>de</strong>xtr<strong>in</strong>s preloa<strong>de</strong>d with other molecules did not.<br />

Acknowledgments Supported by Colorado State University<br />

Experiment Station and CNPq/Brazil.<br />

P007<br />

Bypass fat supplementation <strong>in</strong> zebu cows (Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus)<br />

<strong>in</strong> the early postpartum: an alternative to <strong>de</strong>crease the<br />

open days period<br />

Mesa, C 1 ; Mahecha, L 2 ; Ruiz, ZT 1 ; Gallo, J 3 ; Angulo, J 1,2 *; Olivera-Angel, M 1<br />

1Grupo <strong>de</strong> Reproducción - Fisiología y Biotecnología, <strong>Facultad</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Ciencias</strong><br />

Agrarias, Universidad <strong>de</strong> Antioquia, Colombia; 2 Grupo Grica, <strong>Facultad</strong> <strong>de</strong><br />

<strong>Ciencias</strong> Agrarias, Universidad <strong>de</strong> Antioquia, Colombia; 3 Soluciones<br />

Nutricionales S.A., Me<strong>de</strong>llín, Colombia<br />

Introduction Traditional beef cattle production <strong>in</strong> tropical South<br />

America is extensive and based primarily on Bos <strong>in</strong>dicus cattle and its<br />

crosses. This productive system <strong>in</strong>volves the permanent contact of the<br />

cow with its calf, feed<strong>in</strong>g with low nutritional value grass and the<br />

highly seasonal supply of forage. These characteristics are the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

causes of postpartum anoestrus and the long calv<strong>in</strong>g to conception<br />

period (open days). Nowadays, there are some management strategies<br />

which help to <strong>de</strong>crease the postpartum anoestrus and the open days.<br />

The use of bypass fat <strong>in</strong> or<strong>de</strong>r to <strong>in</strong>crease the energetic contribution of<br />

the diet, and the restricted suckl<strong>in</strong>g practices, are some of them.<br />

However, these practices are usually used <strong>in</strong> a separated way. The<br />

objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of mix<strong>in</strong>g a temporal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!