10.01.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />

Poster Abstracts 217<br />

P573<br />

Sperm morphology of beef bulls evaluated by nigros<strong>in</strong>eos<strong>in</strong><br />

and differential <strong>in</strong>terference phase contras<br />

Freneau, G 1 *, Chenoweth, P 2 , Ellis, RW 3 , Rupp, G 4<br />

1Lab. Andrologyand Semen Technology Animal Sc, Veter<strong>in</strong>ary school /<br />

Fe<strong>de</strong>ral University of Goias, Brazil; 2 School of Agricultural and Veter<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia; 3 Dept. of<br />

Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Sciences Integrated Livestock Ma, Colorado State University, United<br />

States; 4 Great Pla<strong>in</strong>s Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Educational Center, University of Nebraska,<br />

United States<br />

The objectives of this study were to compare two different methods of<br />

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g bull sperm morphology: bright-field (BF) microscopy of<br />

eos<strong>in</strong>-nigros<strong>in</strong> (EN) sta<strong>in</strong>ed dry-mount semen smears and differential<br />

<strong>in</strong>terference phase contrast (DIC) microscopy of wet-mount semen<br />

‘fixed’ <strong>in</strong> isotonic formal sal<strong>in</strong>e; both at 1000X. Seventy-two<br />

ejaculates were evaluated, represent<strong>in</strong>g both pre- and post-breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

season ejaculates collected from 40 2-yr. old beef bulls via electroejaculation.<br />

For both methods, 200 sperm were counted <strong>in</strong> random<br />

fields with <strong>de</strong>fects categorized as major (MAD) and m<strong>in</strong>or (MID).<br />

Sperm abnormalities were also placed <strong>in</strong>to two other categories: those<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red to be most <strong>in</strong>fluenced by process (wet or dry; METHD)<br />

and those whose <strong>de</strong>piction could be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by optics (BF or DIC;<br />

OPTD). Differences (P0.05) <strong>in</strong> percent normal sperm 69.1 /<br />

70.4 or sperm head <strong>de</strong>fects 7.5 / 8.3. Acrosome, tail and droplet<br />

<strong>de</strong>fects were observed <strong>in</strong> 98.2 / 80.5, 86.1 / 100 and 98.2 / 94.4<br />

percent of bulls for DIC and BF respectively (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!