10.01.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

Reproduction in Domestic Animals - Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 t h International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong><br />

Poster Abstracts 151<br />

protam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> con<strong>de</strong>ns<strong>in</strong>g chromat<strong>in</strong>, facilitates DNA breakage. It<br />

is suggested that a reduction <strong>in</strong> the level of <strong>de</strong>oxyribonucleic acid<br />

protection, ren<strong>de</strong>r the DNA molecule more sensitive to external<br />

damag<strong>in</strong>g agents.<br />

P375<br />

GnRH-a <strong>in</strong>duced steroid hormone receptor regulation <strong>in</strong><br />

bov<strong>in</strong>e endometrium<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gh, R*; Pretheeben, T; Perera, R; Rajamahendran, R<br />

Animal Science, University of British Columbia, Canada<br />

Introduction Ovarian steroids consistently <strong>in</strong>fluence the<br />

endometrium and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> its cyclicity by act<strong>in</strong>g through their<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g receptors. Estrogen receptors(ER α and ER β) and<br />

progesterone receptors (PR) are present <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e endometrium <strong>in</strong><br />

follicular and luteal phases of the estrous cycle, bov<strong>in</strong>e ovaries and<br />

placentomes. We, most recently <strong>de</strong>monstrated the presence of GnRH<br />

receptors (GnRH-R) <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e endometrium at both mRNA and<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> level and localized these receptors to endometrial epithelial<br />

cells <strong>in</strong> both the phases of the estrous cycle. Additionally GnRH-R<br />

mRNA is also present <strong>in</strong> normal and carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic human<br />

endometrium and endometriosis, where GnRH acts <strong>in</strong> an apoptotic<br />

and antiproliferative manner. GnRH is wi<strong>de</strong>ly used <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e<br />

reproductive management <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g estrous and ovulation<br />

synchronization, <strong>in</strong>duction of ovulation, post partum cyclicity,<br />

treatment of cystic ovarian disease, to overcome early embryonic<br />

mortality, and <strong>in</strong>crease pregnancy rates; but there is clear lack of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on its local modulatory role <strong>in</strong> the endometrium. We f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

the co-existence of GnRH-R and steroid hormone receptors as<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and there are prior reports about ligand <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />

activation of steroid hormone receptors. Whether GnRH through its<br />

receptors could regulate these receptors <strong>in</strong> normal endometrium is still<br />

not known and this study, for the first time exam<strong>in</strong>ed the GnRH<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced regulation of ER α and ER β and PR <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e endometrium.<br />

Materials and Methods Uteri belong<strong>in</strong>g to follicular and luteal<br />

phases of the estrous cycle were collected from the local abattoir,<br />

transported to lab with<strong>in</strong> one hour. One hundred mg of endometrial<br />

explants were cultured at 37 0 C, 5% CO 2 <strong>in</strong> humidified atmosphere.<br />

After 20 h <strong>in</strong>cubation, explants were treated with different doses of<br />

GnRH agonist – buserel<strong>in</strong> (0, 200, 500, 1000 ng/mL respectively),<br />

GnRH antagonist – anti<strong>de</strong> (500 ng/mL) and a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of anti<strong>de</strong><br />

(500ng/mL) and buserel<strong>in</strong> (200ng/mL) for 6 h. Two µg of total RNA<br />

extracted from each treatment was reverse transcribed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

commercially available kit and the mRNA levels of ER α, ER β and<br />

PR were assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and us<strong>in</strong>g the gene<br />

specific primers G3PDH was used as an <strong>in</strong>ternal control <strong>in</strong> the<br />

experiments. Optical <strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>in</strong>dividual bands was analyzed by<br />

Scion imag<strong>in</strong>g beta and statistically analyzed by compar<strong>in</strong>g to control<br />

and us<strong>in</strong>g stu<strong>de</strong>nt t test.<br />

Results This study revealed that GnRH (200ng/mL) upregulated ER α<br />

mRNA <strong>in</strong> both follicular and luteal phases of the estrous cycle and it<br />

this effect was more pronounced (P≤ 0.05) <strong>in</strong> the luteal phase;<br />

whereas mRNA levels of ER β and PR were not altered.<br />

Conclusions GnRH <strong>in</strong>duced upregulation of ER α could have<br />

potential implications on reproductive process such as gamete<br />

transport, fertilization, cellular proliferation, uter<strong>in</strong>e receptivity,<br />

implantation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of normal physiological status of the<br />

uterus and <strong>in</strong>creases our un<strong>de</strong>rstand<strong>in</strong>gs of the molecular basis of the<br />

reproduction at the endometrial level.<br />

P376<br />

Effect of pre-<strong>in</strong>cubation of male and female gametes with<br />

fibronect<strong>in</strong> prior to fertilization <strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>in</strong> cattle<br />

Thys, M 1 *; Nauwynck, H 2 ; Maes, D 1 ; Van Soom, A 1<br />

1Department of <strong>Reproduction</strong>, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of<br />

Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Ghent University, Belgium; 2 Department of Virology,<br />

Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Ghent<br />

University, Belgium<br />

Carbohydrates and glycoprote<strong>in</strong>s modulate various adhesion and<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g events <strong>in</strong> reproductive processes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sperm-oviduct<br />

adhesion, sperm-egg <strong>in</strong>teraction and embryo implantation. When<br />

fibronect<strong>in</strong> (Fn) – an extracellular matrix glycoprote<strong>in</strong> – is<br />

supplemented to the fertilization medium, a substantial <strong>in</strong>hibition of<br />

sperm penetration dur<strong>in</strong>g bov<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization (IVF) was<br />

observed. To i<strong>de</strong>ntify whether Fn <strong>in</strong>teracts with either male or female<br />

gametes, 2 experiments were conducted <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g either sperm cells<br />

or cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) with Fn prior to IVF.<br />

To evaluate the effect of Fn on sperm, 2 groups of <strong>in</strong> vitro matured<br />

bov<strong>in</strong>e COCs were fertilized <strong>in</strong> standard medium. One group was<br />

<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ated with spermatozoa (1x10 6 sp/ml) previously <strong>in</strong>cubated<br />

with 500 nM Fn for 30 m<strong>in</strong>. The second group was fertilized with<br />

spermatozoa (same ejaculate) <strong>in</strong>cubated with standard medium. Two<br />

extra experiments – where the sperm cells were <strong>in</strong>cubated for 2 h resp<br />

4 h – were performed to evaluate effect of time of sperm pre<strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

on <strong>in</strong>hibition of sperm penetration. To assess the effect of<br />

Fn on the female gamete, <strong>in</strong> vitro matured COCs were divi<strong>de</strong>d <strong>in</strong>to 2<br />

groups. The first group was fertilized un<strong>de</strong>r standard conditions, the<br />

second one was treated with 500 nM Fn for 30 m<strong>in</strong> prior to IVF.<br />

Subsequently, a similar setup was applied on zona-free oocytes.<br />

Twenty hours after <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation, all presumed zygotes were fixed,<br />

sta<strong>in</strong>ed with Hoechst 33342 and evaluated by fluorescence<br />

microscopy for sperm penetration and fertilization. Differences <strong>in</strong><br />

fertilization and penetration percentage were analyzed by b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

logistic regression (SPSS 15.0).<br />

Pre-<strong>in</strong>cubation of sperm cells with Fn significantly <strong>de</strong>creased the<br />

sperm penetration compared to that of the control (75.2% vs 87.0%)<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>hibition of penetration of 13.6%. The same ten<strong>de</strong>ncy<br />

was observed for fertilization with or without Fn pre-<strong>in</strong>cubated sperm<br />

(68.6 % vs 78.2 %). Prolong<strong>in</strong>g the duration of sperm pre-<strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

caused more prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong>hibition of penetration (22.2% after 2 h;<br />

42.8% after 4 h). When pre-<strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g COCs with Fn, penetration<br />

was not significantly reduced (76.2% vs 83.0 %) compared to that of<br />

the control, nor was the fertilization rate (67.3% vs 75.4%).<br />

Furthermore, Fn pre-<strong>in</strong>cubation of zona-free oocytes did not affect<br />

sperm penetration (42.0% vs 46.9%) nor fertilization (37.1% vs<br />

37.0%).<br />

In conclusion, Fn <strong>in</strong>hibits sperm penetration <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e COCs through<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction with the sperm cell. To elucidate the un<strong>de</strong>rly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mechanism, i<strong>de</strong>ntification of receptors for Fn on bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm is<br />

required.<br />

P377<br />

Effect of replacer of fetal calf serum <strong>in</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />

and gene expression <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos <strong>in</strong> vitro cultured<br />

Serapião, RV 1 *; Boité, MC 1,2 ; Camargo, LSA 1 ; Polisseni, J 1 ; Viana, JHM 1 ;<br />

Folha<strong>de</strong>lla, I 1 ; Sá, WF 1 ; Fonseca, FA 4<br />

1Laboratório <strong>de</strong> Reprodução Animal, Embrapa Gado <strong>de</strong> Leite, Brazil;<br />

2Faculda<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>a Veter<strong>in</strong>ária, Universida<strong>de</strong> Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Flum<strong>in</strong>ense,<br />

Brazil; 3 Laboratório <strong>de</strong> Genética Molecular, Embrapa Gado <strong>de</strong> Leite, Brazil;<br />

4Laboratório <strong>de</strong> Reprodução Animal, Universida<strong>de</strong> Estadual do Norte<br />

Flum<strong>in</strong>ense, Brazil<br />

Introduction The period of post fertilization embryo culture is the<br />

most critical affect<strong>in</strong>g blastocyst quality. Knockout SR (Gibco Labs.,<br />

Grand Island, NY) is a serum replacer optimized to support<br />

embryonic stem cells <strong>in</strong> culture and can also be used to replace serum<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g culture of bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos. The expression of genes associated<br />

to stress response, such as heat shock prote<strong>in</strong>s (Hsp), can be affected<br />

by <strong>in</strong> vitro culture conditions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g culture medium components.<br />

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Knockout TM SR on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!