10.01.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esembles those of Cladodoides and Tamiobatis,<br />

especially in the proportions of its otic<br />

region, the presence of an extensive dorsum<br />

sellae, and the arrangement of canals for major<br />

nerves and blood vessels. The internal<br />

structure of the occipital region is remarkably<br />

like that found in Tamiobatis braincases in<br />

having a prominent subnotochordal septum<br />

and paired subnotochordal and paroccipital<br />

chambers. Cladodus is no longer regarded as a<br />

nomen dubium, since only a few species<br />

founded on isolated teeth are now retained in<br />

the re-diagnosed genus, and one of these<br />

(C. elegans) is now associated with skeletal<br />

remains. The best systematic placement for<br />

Cladodus sensu stricto is among the Ctenacanthiformes<br />

or even the Ctenacanthidae.<br />

Cladodus may be a synonym of Ctenacanthus,<br />

but this cannot be confirmed with the available<br />

material.<br />

2008010271<br />

Spitsbergen 早 泥 盆 世 Gigantaspis = The<br />

genus Gigantaspis heintz, 1962 (Vertebrata,<br />

Heterostraci) from the lower Devonian of<br />

Spitsbergen. ( 英 文 ). Pernegre V; Goujet D.<br />

Palaeontology, 2007, 50(2): 323-346<br />

Material collected in 1969 by the CNRS-<br />

MNHN expedition to Spitsbergen includes a<br />

new species of Gigantaspis, G. minima, which<br />

is the smallest known species of this genus.<br />

The revision of Gigantaspis leads to the inclusion<br />

of Zascinaspis laticephala Blieck and<br />

Goujet in this genus. The phylogenetic analysis<br />

presented herein suggests that Gigantaspis<br />

is close to Zascinaspis, as suggested by Blieck.<br />

Moreover, it is also close to generalized representatives<br />

of the Protaspididae. Their shared<br />

character states allow the definition of a possible<br />

ancestral morphotype for the Protaspididae.<br />

2008010272<br />

得 克 萨 斯 早 白 垩 世 阿 尔 布 期 Pawpaw 页 岩<br />

中 的 Anacoracid 类 = Anacoracid Sharks<br />

From The Albian (Lower Cretaceous) Pawpaw<br />

Shale of Texas. ( 英 文 ). Siverson M;<br />

Lindgren J; Kelley L S. Palaeontology, 2007,<br />

50(4): 939-950<br />

Recent collecting from the Pawpaw Shale<br />

in north-east Texas has yielded several hundred<br />

teeth of anacoracid sharks. The material<br />

allows for a much-needed revision of the Late<br />

Albian anacoracids from North America. The<br />

previously recognized Squalicorax sp., also<br />

referred to as S. volgensis in more recent publications,<br />

is a mix of two different species:<br />

S. priscoserratus sp. nov. and S. pawpawensis<br />

sp. nov. In addition to these two new species,<br />

a single tooth is assigned to S. aff.<br />

S. baharijensis. Our data indicate that anacoracids<br />

were a considerably more diverse<br />

group in the North American Cretaceous than<br />

previously thought. We attribute much of the<br />

underestimation of diversity to vague species<br />

concepts, poor preparation techniques and the<br />

associated lack of attention to certain dental<br />

features, in particular neck morphology, root<br />

surface porosity and the root's vascularization.<br />

2008010273<br />

对 存 疑 Auchenaspis 的 综 述 及 其 在<br />

Thyestidian 演 化 上 的 作 用 = A Review Of<br />

The Problematic Osteostracan Genus<br />

Auchenaspis And Its Role In Thyestidian Evolution.<br />

( 英 文 ). Sansom R. Palaeontology,<br />

2007, 50(4): 1001-1011<br />

The poorly understood osteostracan genus<br />

Auchenaspis, from the Upper Silurian of England,<br />

belongs to the thyestidians (Thyestiida),<br />

a controversial and important group that is key<br />

to the understanding of the evolution of the<br />

Osteostraci and paired pectoral fins. The two<br />

under-studied species of this genus are comprehensively<br />

reviewed using anatomical and<br />

novel statistical approaches. No reliable anatomical<br />

characters can be used to distinguish<br />

between the two species, yet discriminant<br />

analysis finds significant separation with respect<br />

to size. Potential causes of this conflict<br />

are discussed. The findings enable<br />

Auchenaspis to be considered in terms of<br />

wider thyestidian evolution and contradict<br />

previous interpretations of the genus as representing<br />

a paraphyletic taxon, whose morphology<br />

is intermediate between the general osteostracan<br />

condition and the highly derived tremataspids.<br />

2008010274<br />

西 班 牙 北 部 比 利 牛 斯 山 脉 南 部 晚 坎 潘 期 及<br />

早 马 斯 特 里 赫 特 期 ( 晚 白 垩 世 ) 的<br />

Neoselachians = Neoselachians From The<br />

Upper Campanian And Lower Maastrichtian<br />

(Upper Cretaceous) Of The Southern Pyrenees,<br />

Northern Spain. ( 英 文 ). Kriwet J; Soler-Gijón<br />

R; López-Martínez N. Palaeontology, 2007,<br />

50(5): 1051-1071<br />

Bulk sampling of upper Campanian to<br />

lower–middle Maastrichtian coastal and lagoonal<br />

deposits in five sections of the Tremp<br />

Formation in the south-central Pyrenees<br />

yielded numerous neoselachian teeth. The<br />

fauna comprises nine taxa of which three spe-<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!