10.01.2015 Views

Corporate governance and earnings management ... - CEREG

Corporate governance and earnings management ... - CEREG

Corporate governance and earnings management ... - CEREG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

supporters of the actuarial approach, like the author (Anonymous, 1919, p. 200-201) who<br />

wages war on those who see goodwill as “an illusory asset”, <strong>and</strong> asserts that it “is not subject<br />

to depreciation as such”.<br />

But the apparent diversity can be misleading: the “weakened” static approach is “in the air”,<br />

although the fact that a good many authors defend the actuarial approach (at least from a<br />

theoretical st<strong>and</strong>point) shows that some of the accounting community were looking for a new<br />

way.<br />

In spite of that, one can say with an historian of British accounting that in the early part of<br />

the 20 th century, at a time when “creditors <strong>and</strong> long-term investors were regarded as the<br />

principal users”, “the use of conservative valuation procedures was advocated by influential<br />

contemporary authorities” (Edwards, 1989, p. 110).<br />

This weakened static solution was to win the day but remained in the UK the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

approach until the end of the 1980s. Apart from reference to the influence of the dominant<br />

doctrine, two facts support this statement:<br />

- Firstly, in spite of one attempt to change the situation (a discussion paper dated 1980 with<br />

a proposal for capitalization <strong>and</strong> systematic amortization), at no time were the British<br />

lawmakers in a position to impose a solution contrary to the dominant practice (Paterson,<br />

2002b). Furthermore, SSAP 22 (ASC, 1984, revised in 1989) admitted again goodwill to<br />

be written off immediately against reserve while (only) offering the possibility of<br />

capitalization <strong>and</strong> amortization against future profits over its “useful economic life”. The<br />

first treatment was adopted almost universally (Arnold et al., 1994; Peasnell, 1996).<br />

- Secondly, on the whole, this solution seemed to satisfy practitioners. In a 1974 survey of<br />

large British companies’ financial statements by the ICAEW, of 209 companies, 129<br />

eliminated goodwill without amortization, (only) 6 amortized it <strong>and</strong> 72 recorded it in<br />

fixed assets <strong>and</strong> applied no amortization. This proves that the weakened static solution<br />

was predominant. However, the existence of a non-negligible practice of keeping<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!