LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COLWELL: TO BE IN PAIN, OR NOT TO BE 9<br />
Let those who are enthralled with the idea that physicians would be<br />
incorruptible if VAE were legalised consider the findings of the Remmelink<br />
Commission. This was a commission set up by the Dutch Ministers of<br />
Health and Justice in January 1990 to gather detailed information about the<br />
practice of euthanasia by physicians in The Netherlands. The data in the<br />
commission’s report, released in September 1991, have been variously<br />
received and interpreted. 7 The report itself and a summary of the report both<br />
try to allay the anxieties of the Dutch and American societies regarding the<br />
large number of cases of voluntary and especially non-voluntary active<br />
euthanasia discovered in the Netherlands. 8 But some reviewers of the report<br />
have been sharply critical of the widespread practice of euthanasia. 9 Still<br />
others have attempted to strike a balance between the nearly-everything’sall-right<br />
interpretation and the nearly-everything’s-all-wrong interpretation.<br />
They find merit in what the Dutch government and physicians have been<br />
doing in the area of health care, but point out some worrisome irregularities<br />
in the Dutch physicians’ practices, as well as the danger of trying to use<br />
those practices per se as a model for other countries. 10 However, all the<br />
interpretations I have read acknowledge the fact that Dutch physicians in a<br />
large number of cases have broken the Royal Dutch Medical Association’s<br />
code of ethics, published in 1984, as well as the governmental guidelines on<br />
the practice of euthanasia, also established in 1984. To take the clearest<br />
example, in 1990 there were about one thousand cases of active nonvoluntary<br />
euthanasia. 11<br />
What much of the public under the tutelage of Plato does not see, and<br />
what those under the tutelage of the apostle Paul do see, is that knowing<br />
where to draw the moral line in cases of VAE is not the main problem.<br />
Rather, the main problem is gathering the moral resolve to keep from<br />
crossing the line. Witness our current situation. For a good long time we<br />
have had a clear legal line barring us from the practice of VAE; but now<br />
there is almost a stampede to cross it. What is especially troubling is that<br />
many physicians are at the front of the herd.<br />
7 See the late Daniel Overduin’s comments in “Matters of Life and Death: Bioethical<br />
Issues in a Christian Perspective”, LTR 4.1/2:69-93.<br />
8 Henk A. M. J. ten Have and Jos V. M. Welie, “Euthanasia: Normal Medical Practice”<br />
Hastings Center Report 22.2 (March-April 1992): 36; Paul J. van der Maas, Johannes J. M.<br />
van Delden, Loes Pijnenborg, and Caspar W. N. Looman, “Euthanasia and Other Medical<br />
Decisions Concerning the End of Life”, The Lancet 338.8768 (14 September 1991): 669-74.<br />
9 Richard Fenigsen, “The Report of the Dutch Governmental Committee on<br />
Euthanasia”, Issues in Law and Medicine 7.3 (Winter 1991): 339-44.<br />
10 Barney Sneiderman, “Euthanasia in the Netherlands: A Model for Canada” Humane<br />
Medicine 8. 2 (April 1992): 104-15.<br />
11 Sneiderman, 105-6.