LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> IX<br />
One word of God is all the words of God; one article is all the articles<br />
and all are one, and when one article is lost, then by the loss of that one<br />
all are lost eventually. For all the articles belong together in one common<br />
chain. 63<br />
In these statements, Luther is asserting that to speak of Christ is to<br />
speak of the whole Gospel: all the doctrines of Scripture. To attack any<br />
doctrine is to attack Christ. From these statements, it is clear that, for Luther,<br />
was Christum treibt “what inculcates Christ”, the solus Christus “Christ<br />
alone” principle, is not only the central point of Christian doctrine but the<br />
whole of Christian doctrine. Accordingly, Robert Preus approves, 64 as in<br />
keeping with Luther’s theology, David Scaer’s assertion that Christology is<br />
not simply the most important part of theology, but its only part:<br />
Any attempt to make Christology preliminary to theology or even only<br />
its most important part, but not its only part, is a denial of Luther’s<br />
doctrine and effectively destroys the Gospel as a message of completed<br />
atonement. 65<br />
15. SCRIPTURE AND THE WORD OF GOD<br />
The “Gospel-Reductionist” interpretation of Luther insists upon<br />
identifying all his references to “the Word of God” as references to the<br />
Incarnate Word, Jesus Christ. This is accompanied by the denial, in the<br />
relevant passages at least, that “Word of God” in Luther denotes Scripture.<br />
Their whole case depends upon being free to make a distinction between<br />
that in Scripture which is the Word of God, on the one hand, and that in<br />
Scripture which is not the Word of God, on the other hand. They also insist<br />
that Luther draws this distinction.<br />
Now it is true that Luther sometimes makes a graphic identification of<br />
the written Word with the Incarnate Word. By “Word of God”, Luther<br />
frequently means the Gospel, or the whole of Christian doctrine. 66<br />
However, there are also many occasions on which Luther identifies<br />
Scripture with the Word of God. For example, above we cited the fact that<br />
W. Bodamer found over one thousand citations from Luther clearly<br />
asserting that the Bible is the Word of God. 67<br />
63 AE 27:38. See also Preus, “Luther: Word, Doctrine and Confession” 39.<br />
64 Preus, “Luther: Word, Doctrine and Confession” 41.<br />
65 David P. Scaer, “Sanctification in Lutheran Theology”, Concordia Theological<br />
Monthly 49.2&3 (April-July 1985): 181-97.<br />
66 Preus, “Luther: Word, Doctrine and Confession” 18.<br />
67 See n. 1 above.