10.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> IX<br />

One word of God is all the words of God; one article is all the articles<br />

and all are one, and when one article is lost, then by the loss of that one<br />

all are lost eventually. For all the articles belong together in one common<br />

chain. 63<br />

In these statements, Luther is asserting that to speak of Christ is to<br />

speak of the whole Gospel: all the doctrines of Scripture. To attack any<br />

doctrine is to attack Christ. From these statements, it is clear that, for Luther,<br />

was Christum treibt “what inculcates Christ”, the solus Christus “Christ<br />

alone” principle, is not only the central point of Christian doctrine but the<br />

whole of Christian doctrine. Accordingly, Robert Preus approves, 64 as in<br />

keeping with Luther’s theology, David Scaer’s assertion that Christology is<br />

not simply the most important part of theology, but its only part:<br />

Any attempt to make Christology preliminary to theology or even only<br />

its most important part, but not its only part, is a denial of Luther’s<br />

doctrine and effectively destroys the Gospel as a message of completed<br />

atonement. 65<br />

15. SCRIPTURE AND THE WORD OF GOD<br />

The “Gospel-Reductionist” interpretation of Luther insists upon<br />

identifying all his references to “the Word of God” as references to the<br />

Incarnate Word, Jesus Christ. This is accompanied by the denial, in the<br />

relevant passages at least, that “Word of God” in Luther denotes Scripture.<br />

Their whole case depends upon being free to make a distinction between<br />

that in Scripture which is the Word of God, on the one hand, and that in<br />

Scripture which is not the Word of God, on the other hand. They also insist<br />

that Luther draws this distinction.<br />

Now it is true that Luther sometimes makes a graphic identification of<br />

the written Word with the Incarnate Word. By “Word of God”, Luther<br />

frequently means the Gospel, or the whole of Christian doctrine. 66<br />

However, there are also many occasions on which Luther identifies<br />

Scripture with the Word of God. For example, above we cited the fact that<br />

W. Bodamer found over one thousand citations from Luther clearly<br />

asserting that the Bible is the Word of God. 67<br />

63 AE 27:38. See also Preus, “Luther: Word, Doctrine and Confession” 39.<br />

64 Preus, “Luther: Word, Doctrine and Confession” 41.<br />

65 David P. Scaer, “Sanctification in Lutheran Theology”, Concordia Theological<br />

Monthly 49.2&3 (April-July 1985): 181-97.<br />

66 Preus, “Luther: Word, Doctrine and Confession” 18.<br />

67 See n. 1 above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!