10.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 53<br />

Up to this point we have had to do with the true and certain chief books<br />

of the New Testament. The four which follow have from ancient times<br />

had a different reputation. 6<br />

The four books that follow are: Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation.<br />

The question that arises is what Luther meant by saying that the whole<br />

number of books prior to this are to be considered “the true and certain chief<br />

books” of the New Testament, and what is the consequent status of the four<br />

that follow. There are many who at this point begin to talk of “protocanonical”<br />

books versus “deutero-canonical” books, as if we were dealing<br />

with two different grades of canonicity, and thus two different degrees of<br />

being God’s Word. That certainly was not Luther’s meaning. As the editor<br />

of AE 35 notes, in a catalogue of “The Books of the New Testament” that<br />

followed immediately upon his “Preface to the New Testament” Luther<br />

listed, and numbered, 23 books of the New Testament, in the same order in<br />

which they appear in today’s English Bibles. The four books in question,<br />

however, are listed separately at the end, and are not numbered. This<br />

catalogue is printed in the Weimar Edition, 7 but is not reproduced in the<br />

American Edition. This is precisely the same procedure that Luther later<br />

(from 1534 onwards) followed in listing the apocryphal books of the Old<br />

Testament. 8 It is self-evident that Luther intended thereby to grant them<br />

similar status.<br />

5. WERE THE OT APOCRYPHA SCRIPTURE FOR LUTHER<br />

What was Luther’s estimation of the status of the Old Testament<br />

Apocrypha It is clear that he did not consider them to be part of the canon<br />

of Scripture. They appear in his German Bible for the first time in 1534,<br />

when the Old Testament was published as a complete unit for the first time.<br />

Earlier editions of the Pentateuch had contained a list of the “24” canonical<br />

books of the Old Testament, numbered in sequence, in the same order which<br />

they still occupy in the English Bible. These 24 books, as the Jews counted<br />

them, include all thirty-nine books which we today have in the Old<br />

Testament (counting the twelve Minor Prophets as one book, and Samuel,<br />

Kings, and Chronicles as one book each, and adding Lamentations to<br />

Jeremiah). After this list follows an unnumbered list of the apocryphal<br />

books: Tobit, Judith, Baruch, Ezra, the Book of Wisdom, Wise Man, and<br />

Maccabees. 9<br />

6 AE 35:394.<br />

7 WA DB 6:12.<br />

8 WA DB 1:35.<br />

9 AE 35:337 n. 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!