LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> IX<br />
act of religious devotion, it proved to be also, as Holl readily points out, a<br />
pioneering step toward modern biblical scholarship. Luther’s prefaces are<br />
thus more than simply popular introductions for lay readers. They reveal<br />
a theological position of christocentricity which inevitably affects his<br />
understanding of the New Testament canon. 4<br />
Note the explicit claim that Luther’s comments on James enunciate his<br />
understanding of Scripture. Note also the implicit claim that Hebrews,<br />
James, Jude, and Revelation are books of secondary rank within Scripture<br />
and within the canon. Note further the implicit claim that Luther operated<br />
with a Christocentric principle as a canon within the canon, distinguishing,<br />
on the one hand, between that within Scripture which is God’s Word and, on<br />
the other hand, that within Scripture which is not God’s Word. These three<br />
claims advance the notion that not everything in Scripture is truly canonical,<br />
and that not everything in Scripture is truly God’s Word. All three of these<br />
claims are demonstrably false. With the fall of these three claims, the<br />
additional implicit claim, that Luther is the father of modern historical<br />
criticism, also falls.<br />
4. LUTHER’S ATTITUDE: THE RIGHT PLACE TO START<br />
The appropriate starting-point for a consideration of the question of<br />
Luther’s attitude to the canon, specifically with reference to the Letter of<br />
James, is not the statement in Luther’s Preface to the Epistles of St James<br />
and St Jude, to which most commentators appeal, but to the prior statement<br />
in his “Preface to the Epistle to the Hebrews”. The September Testament<br />
includes a “Preface to the New Testament”, which serves as an introduction<br />
to all four Gospels. This is followed by a “Preface to the Acts of the<br />
Apostles”. This, in turn, is followed by a lengthy “Preface to St Paul’s<br />
Epistle to the Romans”, which Luther intended as a general introduction to<br />
the second part of the New Testament, matching the earlier introduction to<br />
the Gospels. 5 This is followed by much shorter Prefaces to First Corinthians,<br />
Second Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Colossians, First Thessalonians,<br />
Second Thessalonians, First Timothy, Second Timothy, Titus, Philemon,<br />
First Peter, Second Peter, and then a “Preface to the Three Epistles of St<br />
John”.<br />
At this point, at the end of the list of the books numbered in the Weimar<br />
Edition, a significant change takes place. The “Preface to the Epistle to the<br />
Hebrews” is obviously intended as an introduction to all the books that<br />
follow:<br />
4 AE 35:231f.<br />
5 AE 35:365 n. 15.