10.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> IX<br />

act of religious devotion, it proved to be also, as Holl readily points out, a<br />

pioneering step toward modern biblical scholarship. Luther’s prefaces are<br />

thus more than simply popular introductions for lay readers. They reveal<br />

a theological position of christocentricity which inevitably affects his<br />

understanding of the New Testament canon. 4<br />

Note the explicit claim that Luther’s comments on James enunciate his<br />

understanding of Scripture. Note also the implicit claim that Hebrews,<br />

James, Jude, and Revelation are books of secondary rank within Scripture<br />

and within the canon. Note further the implicit claim that Luther operated<br />

with a Christocentric principle as a canon within the canon, distinguishing,<br />

on the one hand, between that within Scripture which is God’s Word and, on<br />

the other hand, that within Scripture which is not God’s Word. These three<br />

claims advance the notion that not everything in Scripture is truly canonical,<br />

and that not everything in Scripture is truly God’s Word. All three of these<br />

claims are demonstrably false. With the fall of these three claims, the<br />

additional implicit claim, that Luther is the father of modern historical<br />

criticism, also falls.<br />

4. LUTHER’S ATTITUDE: THE RIGHT PLACE TO START<br />

The appropriate starting-point for a consideration of the question of<br />

Luther’s attitude to the canon, specifically with reference to the Letter of<br />

James, is not the statement in Luther’s Preface to the Epistles of St James<br />

and St Jude, to which most commentators appeal, but to the prior statement<br />

in his “Preface to the Epistle to the Hebrews”. The September Testament<br />

includes a “Preface to the New Testament”, which serves as an introduction<br />

to all four Gospels. This is followed by a “Preface to the Acts of the<br />

Apostles”. This, in turn, is followed by a lengthy “Preface to St Paul’s<br />

Epistle to the Romans”, which Luther intended as a general introduction to<br />

the second part of the New Testament, matching the earlier introduction to<br />

the Gospels. 5 This is followed by much shorter Prefaces to First Corinthians,<br />

Second Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Colossians, First Thessalonians,<br />

Second Thessalonians, First Timothy, Second Timothy, Titus, Philemon,<br />

First Peter, Second Peter, and then a “Preface to the Three Epistles of St<br />

John”.<br />

At this point, at the end of the list of the books numbered in the Weimar<br />

Edition, a significant change takes place. The “Preface to the Epistle to the<br />

Hebrews” is obviously intended as an introduction to all the books that<br />

follow:<br />

4 AE 35:231f.<br />

5 AE 35:365 n. 15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!