10.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 50-74<br />

LUTHER ON JAMES: A CURIOUS OVERSIGHT<br />

Glen E. Zweck<br />

1. TWO COMMON MISTAKES<br />

In many of the discussions on the question of Luther and the Letter of<br />

St James, there is a serious distortion that arises from two related mistakes.<br />

The first mistake, the “curious oversight” referred to in the title, is that<br />

of beginning the discussion with comments from Luther’s introduction to<br />

James in the September Testament of 1522. This error results from the<br />

oversight of ignoring the prior comments on the subject in his introduction<br />

to Hebrews, and thus distorting his comments in the introduction to James<br />

by taking them out of their proper context. What Luther says in his<br />

introduction to James presupposes what he had earlier said in the<br />

introduction to Hebrews.<br />

The second mistake is misunderstanding Luther’s comments on<br />

apostolicity in his introduction to the Letter of St James, as if this were a<br />

new and subjective criterion of canonicity invented by Luther himself, and<br />

intended by him to replace the former criteria.<br />

2. GOSPEL-REDUCTIONISM: THE ISSUE DEFINED<br />

A good illustration of these errors, and the resultant evil<br />

consequences, is provided by the editorial comments in volume 35 of the<br />

American Edition of Luther’s Works. These evil consequences are farreaching<br />

indeed, and go to the heart of the dispute over Luther’s<br />

understanding of Scripture. In particular, they have to do with that form of<br />

“Gospel-reductionism” which, under the plea of following Luther’s<br />

Christocentric interpretation of Scripture, turns the material principle of<br />

Christian theology (defining the essence of the Gospel) into a formal<br />

principle (defining the source of Christian theology). “Gospel-reductionists”<br />

frequently accuse the confessional theologians in the LC–MS of turning the<br />

formal principle (the Scripture principle) into a material principle (the<br />

Gospel principle): charging them with teaching that we are saved by the<br />

inerrancy of Scripture. Actually, the boot is entirely on the other foot. It is<br />

the “Gospel-reductionists” who turn the material principle (the Christ<br />

principle) into a formal principle, by teaching that only that in Scripture is<br />

God’s Word which treibt Christum “inculcates Christ”. In doing this, they<br />

seek to enlist Luther on their side, as if he taught that only that in Scripture

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!