LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 50-74<br />
LUTHER ON JAMES: A CURIOUS OVERSIGHT<br />
Glen E. Zweck<br />
1. TWO COMMON MISTAKES<br />
In many of the discussions on the question of Luther and the Letter of<br />
St James, there is a serious distortion that arises from two related mistakes.<br />
The first mistake, the “curious oversight” referred to in the title, is that<br />
of beginning the discussion with comments from Luther’s introduction to<br />
James in the September Testament of 1522. This error results from the<br />
oversight of ignoring the prior comments on the subject in his introduction<br />
to Hebrews, and thus distorting his comments in the introduction to James<br />
by taking them out of their proper context. What Luther says in his<br />
introduction to James presupposes what he had earlier said in the<br />
introduction to Hebrews.<br />
The second mistake is misunderstanding Luther’s comments on<br />
apostolicity in his introduction to the Letter of St James, as if this were a<br />
new and subjective criterion of canonicity invented by Luther himself, and<br />
intended by him to replace the former criteria.<br />
2. GOSPEL-REDUCTIONISM: THE ISSUE DEFINED<br />
A good illustration of these errors, and the resultant evil<br />
consequences, is provided by the editorial comments in volume 35 of the<br />
American Edition of Luther’s Works. These evil consequences are farreaching<br />
indeed, and go to the heart of the dispute over Luther’s<br />
understanding of Scripture. In particular, they have to do with that form of<br />
“Gospel-reductionism” which, under the plea of following Luther’s<br />
Christocentric interpretation of Scripture, turns the material principle of<br />
Christian theology (defining the essence of the Gospel) into a formal<br />
principle (defining the source of Christian theology). “Gospel-reductionists”<br />
frequently accuse the confessional theologians in the LC–MS of turning the<br />
formal principle (the Scripture principle) into a material principle (the<br />
Gospel principle): charging them with teaching that we are saved by the<br />
inerrancy of Scripture. Actually, the boot is entirely on the other foot. It is<br />
the “Gospel-reductionists” who turn the material principle (the Christ<br />
principle) into a formal principle, by teaching that only that in Scripture is<br />
God’s Word which treibt Christum “inculcates Christ”. In doing this, they<br />
seek to enlist Luther on their side, as if he taught that only that in Scripture