LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
24 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW IX C. Robert Hogg, Jr is Assistant Professor of Systematic Theology at Concordia Lutheran Theological Seminary, St. Catharines, Ontario.
LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 25-31 A PROGENY OF A THEOLOGICAL AND MISSIOLOGICAL UNION: HOUSE CHURCHES 1 Glenn E. Schaeffer If you asked, “Where is the church” in any important city of the ancient world where Christianity had penetrated in the first century, you would have been directed to a group of worshipping people gathered in a house church. There was no special building or other tangible wealth with which to associate “church,” only people! 2 Walter Oetting’s words may surprise the Christian of the twentieth century who lives in a world dotted with towering temples, baronial basilicas, cyclopean cathedrals, comely churches, and charming chapels. The truth of the matter is this: for the first two and a half centuries after Pentecost (Acts 2), the Christian house served as a post for missionary activity in an urban centre. The Christian home served as the centre where God’s chosen people would be spiritually fortified through catechesis, sacramental worship and Christian hospitality. The Gospel of Christ spread across the Roman Empire through the planting of house churches. Many scholars assert Christians worshipped in house churches in the two hundred years following our Lord’s ascension because of their poverty, paucity, persecution, 3 and eschatological expectations. 4 These assertions cannot be denied, but one might counter, using an analogy of fertility, that house churches were the natural progeny of a theological and missiological union. This paper will try briefly to explain the theological and missiological “seed” that birthed this baby called “the house church”. The first theological “seed” we must consider is christological. The house church is the offspring of an antitypical fulfilment of the Old Testament temple worship and sacrificial worship in the person of Jesus 1 This paper was first presented at a Mission Convocation held at Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, IN, on 23 February 1994. 2 Walter Oetting, The Church of the Catacombs (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House, 1964) 24. 3 J. G. Davies, The Secular Use of Church Buildings (New York: The Seabury Press, 1968) 1-9. 4 See Robert M. Grant, Early Christianity and Society (New York: Harper & Row, 1977) 146; Metosalem Castillo, The Church in Thy House (Metro Manila, Philippines: Alliance Publishers, Inc., 1982) 53-54; Vincent Branick, The House Church in the Writings of Paul, Zaccheus Studies: New Testament (Wilmington, Delaware: Michael Glazier, 1989) 14; Massey H. Shepherd, Jr, ed., Worship in Scripture and Tradition. Essays by Members of the Theological Commission on Worship (North American Section) of the Commission on Faith and Order of the WCC (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963) 141-42.
- Page 1 and 2: LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW publish
- Page 3 and 4: LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW Volume
- Page 5 and 6: LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 5-12
- Page 7 and 8: COLWELL: TO BE IN PAIN, OR NOT TO B
- Page 9 and 10: COLWELL: TO BE IN PAIN, OR NOT TO B
- Page 11 and 12: COLWELL: TO BE IN PAIN, OR NOT TO B
- Page 13 and 14: LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 13-2
- Page 15 and 16: HOGG: SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE O
- Page 17 and 18: HOGG: SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE O
- Page 19 and 20: HOGG: SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE O
- Page 21 and 22: HOGG: SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE O
- Page 23: HOGG: SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE O
- Page 27 and 28: SCHAEFFER: HOUSE CHURCHES 27 The te
- Page 29 and 30: SCHAEFFER: HOUSE CHURCHES 29 within
- Page 31 and 32: SCHAEFFER: HOUSE CHURCHES 31 of sin
- Page 33 and 34: STEPHENSON: LET YOUR HOLY ANGEL BE
- Page 35 and 36: STEPHENSON: LET YOUR HOLY ANGEL BE
- Page 37 and 38: STEPHENSON: LET YOUR HOLY ANGEL BE
- Page 39 and 40: STEPHENSON: LET YOUR HOLY ANGEL BE
- Page 41 and 42: STEPHENSON: LET YOUR HOLY ANGEL BE
- Page 43 and 44: WILCH: MUSLIMS IN CANADA 43 There a
- Page 45 and 46: WILCH: MUSLIMS IN CANADA 45 anyone
- Page 47 and 48: WILCH: MUSLIMS IN CANADA 47 an orga
- Page 49 and 50: WILCH: MUSLIMS IN CANADA 49 ourselv
- Page 51 and 52: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 51 is God’
- Page 53 and 54: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 53 Up to thi
- Page 55 and 56: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 55 6. WAS JA
- Page 57 and 58: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 57 Note a si
- Page 59 and 60: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 59 school.
- Page 61 and 62: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 61 In the se
- Page 63 and 64: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 63 Thus Luth
- Page 65 and 66: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 65 This can
- Page 67 and 68: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 67 preaches
- Page 69 and 70: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 69 apostle,
- Page 71 and 72: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 71 works in
- Page 73 and 74: ZWECK: LUTHER ON JAMES 73 In view o
LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 25-31<br />
A PROGENY OF A <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> AND MISSIOLOGICAL<br />
UNION: HOUSE CHURCHES 1<br />
Glenn E. Schaeffer<br />
If you asked, “Where is the church” in any important city of the ancient<br />
world where Christianity had penetrated in the first century, you would<br />
have been directed to a group of worshipping people gathered in a house<br />
church. There was no special building or other tangible wealth with<br />
which to associate “church,” only people! 2<br />
Walter Oetting’s words may surprise the Christian of the twentieth<br />
century who lives in a world dotted with towering temples, baronial<br />
basilicas, cyclopean cathedrals, comely churches, and charming chapels.<br />
The truth of the matter is this: for the first two and a half centuries after<br />
Pentecost (Acts 2), the Christian house served as a post for missionary<br />
activity in an urban centre. The Christian home served as the centre where<br />
God’s chosen people would be spiritually fortified through catechesis,<br />
sacramental worship and Christian hospitality. The Gospel of Christ spread<br />
across the Roman Empire through the planting of house churches.<br />
Many scholars assert Christians worshipped in house churches in the<br />
two hundred years following our Lord’s ascension because of their poverty,<br />
paucity, persecution, 3 and eschatological expectations. 4 These assertions<br />
cannot be denied, but one might counter, using an analogy of fertility, that<br />
house churches were the natural progeny of a theological and missiological<br />
union. This paper will try briefly to explain the theological and<br />
missiological “seed” that birthed this baby called “the house church”.<br />
The first theological “seed” we must consider is christological. The<br />
house church is the offspring of an antitypical fulfilment of the Old<br />
Testament temple worship and sacrificial worship in the person of Jesus<br />
1 This paper was first presented at a Mission Convocation held at Concordia<br />
Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, IN, on 23 February 1994.<br />
2 Walter Oetting, The Church of the Catacombs (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing<br />
House, 1964) 24.<br />
3 J. G. Davies, The Secular Use of Church Buildings (New York: The Seabury Press,<br />
1968) 1-9.<br />
4 See Robert M. Grant, Early Christianity and Society (New York: Harper & Row,<br />
1977) 146; Metosalem Castillo, The Church in Thy House (Metro Manila, Philippines:<br />
Alliance Publishers, Inc., 1982) 53-54; Vincent Branick, The House Church in the Writings<br />
of Paul, Zaccheus Studies: New Testament (Wilmington, Delaware: Michael Glazier, 1989)<br />
14; Massey H. Shepherd, Jr, ed., Worship in Scripture and Tradition. Essays by Members of<br />
the Theological Commission on Worship (North American Section) of the Commission on<br />
Faith and Order of the WCC (New York: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press, 1963) 141-42.