LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
22 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> IX<br />
But if children cannot believe, what then happens to them if they die<br />
He says, “… it is only if we ascribe magical powers to baptism that we can<br />
believe that it confers a claim relating to the life after death quite<br />
irrespectively of its influence on this life.” 34 For Schleiermacher there is no<br />
difference between the child who never was baptised and the child who was<br />
baptised but did not live to renew his baptismal covenant. Infant Baptism is<br />
a bond between the infant and the Kingdom, but it does not have magical<br />
power to make them believe.<br />
SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE<br />
One cannot fail to be impressed by the inner consistency and systematic<br />
nature of Schleiermacher’s presentation of Christianity. His entire<br />
presentation, also in the doctrine of Baptism, moves between the poles of<br />
experience and history, and is rooted in the notion that faith necessarily<br />
involves self-consciousness.<br />
In addition, fairness demands that we acknowledge<br />
Schleiermacher’s own motivation for re-working the traditional corpus<br />
doctrinae in this radically new way. First and foremost, he sought to be an<br />
apologist for Christianity—one who explained the faith to those around him<br />
in terms which they would understand. Hence the title of his first book,<br />
Speeches on Religion to its Cultured Despisers.<br />
With these considerations in mind, let us reflect on Schleiermacher’s<br />
presentation of Baptism. In particular, it is worth pondering his notion that<br />
faith necessarily involves self-consciousness. Schleiermacher says, “… this<br />
term [i.e., ‘faith’] always signifies, in our present province, the certainty<br />
which accompanies a state of the higher self-consciousness.” 35 Indeed, near<br />
the very beginning of The Christian Faith he says:<br />
§3. The piety which forms the basis of all ecclesiastical communions<br />
is, considered purely in itself, neither a Knowing nor a Doing, but a<br />
modification of Feeling, or of immediate self-consciousness. 36<br />
The view that Schleiermacher espouses has a long history; already in the<br />
public ministry of Jesus the disciples rebuked mothers who brought their<br />
children to Jesus for His blessing. How shocked the disciples must have<br />
been when Jesus told them that the Kingdom of God belonged to children<br />
(ta. paidi,a), and that children are the paradigmatic recipients of that<br />
Kingdom! Nor was this utterance isolated; on another occasion He said that<br />
34 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 637.<br />
35 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 68.<br />
36 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 5. Emphasis original.