LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HOGG: SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE OF BAPTISM 21<br />
damnamus of Augustana IX. He holds that fellowship with the Baptists<br />
would be possible provided they recognise that infant Baptism is not<br />
absolutely invalid “when supplemented by confirmation”. 29<br />
As implied earlier, for Schleiermacher the normal candidate for<br />
Baptism was the adult; thus he had to explain whence came the custom of<br />
paedobaptism. He lists four reasons for infant Baptism’s appearance in the<br />
life of the church:<br />
1. The desire to include Christian children who had died before the age<br />
of instruction in the people of God.<br />
2. To make the church more responsible for the children of parents<br />
unable to implement congregational obligations.<br />
3. To separate Christian youth from Jewish and pagan youth.<br />
4. The comfort that children thus brought would not miss the Spirit’s<br />
nurturing care. 30<br />
He finds no biblical ground for infant Baptism, and says in a practical way<br />
that it should be the decision of each household whether to baptise their<br />
children or wait until they were older.<br />
Moving on to consider paedobaptism from the sphere of the<br />
individual’s relationship to God, Schleiermacher denies that infants have<br />
faith.<br />
… infant baptism is the same as any other baptism which has erroneously<br />
been imparted prior to the full faith of the person baptised and yet is<br />
valid; only, its proper efficacy is suspended until the person baptised has<br />
really become a believer. 31<br />
This again points out what has been noted before, that Schleiermacher<br />
denies that infants can believe. And why can children not believe The<br />
answer is tied up with Schleiermacher’s view of both sin and grace as<br />
conscious states in man. Indeed, original sin itself cannot be viewed as<br />
resulting from the sin of Adam and Eve; Schleiermacher focuses in on the<br />
sociological side of original sin, 32 children lacking consciousness of Godforgetfulness<br />
and the consciousness of its being solved in the Redeemer:<br />
... [J]ust as we cannot suppose that before baptism children are subject to<br />
misery due to a consciousness of sin which is growing into penitence, we<br />
cannot after baptism ascribe to them blessedness due to a dawning sense<br />
of divine sonship. 33<br />
29 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 638.<br />
30 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith, summary of pages 634-35.<br />
31 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 636.<br />
32 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 282ff., 292.<br />
33 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 635.