10.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> IX<br />

Membership in this common life therefore means at the same time being<br />

set within the sphere of operation of the sole Founder … being drawn …<br />

into the fellowship of believers, having a share in the Holy Spirit, and<br />

being drawn into living fellowship with Christ—must simply mean one<br />

and the same thing. 10<br />

As the channel of the divine justifying activity, Baptism is first of all<br />

founded on the command of Christ. The church baptises with confidence<br />

only because it does so because Christ commanded (angeordnet) Baptism,<br />

and is assured that its reception of a person is Christ’s reception of that<br />

person “if performed in the manner He enjoined and according to His<br />

command”. 11<br />

Schleiermacher next examines Baptism as the channel of the divine<br />

justifying activity by comparing Christian Baptism with that of John.<br />

Though he notes the historical connection between the Baptism of John and<br />

Christian Baptism, he denies that they are identical. For how could John’s<br />

Baptism be identical with Christian Baptism when he himself testifies that<br />

he did not know the Redeemer before he baptised Him Furthermore, John<br />

did not baptise in Jesus’ name. Of course, this is not to say that those who<br />

had been baptised by John needed to be rebaptised. As long as they<br />

recognised that Jesus was the Christ, His call to them gave them everything<br />

that Baptism gives. In their case, Baptism would have been an unnecessary<br />

supplement to the call of Christ. The corollary to this understanding is that<br />

Baptism now takes the place of Jesus’ personal call and gives to the<br />

individual both of Baptism’s blessings, “the application of the divine decree<br />

of redemption to the individual, and the placing of the individual in<br />

fellowship with all who already believe …”. 12<br />

Because Baptism is founded on the command of Christ, and takes the<br />

place of His personal choice, it is thirdly a source of assurance for the<br />

Christian in times when doubts of salvation arise. Here Schleiermacher<br />

quotes approvingly from Luther’s Large Catechism, section 44 on Baptism,<br />

where Luther makes this very point. 13 Significantly, however,<br />

Schleiermacher derives this comfort from a different place than Luther:<br />

10 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 575.<br />

11 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 620. Note here also the emphasis on Baptism as<br />

a command of Christ, a common Reformed emphasis as opposed to the Lutheran emphasis on<br />

the promissory nature of Baptism, its character as Gospel.<br />

12 Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith 622.<br />

13 Concordia Triglotta: The Symbolical Books of the Ev. Lutheran Church (St. Louis:<br />

Concordia Publishing House, 1921) 743: “Thus we must regard Baptism and make it<br />

profitable to ourselves, that when our sins and conscience oppress us, we strengthen<br />

ourselves and take comfort and say: Nevertheless I am baptized ... .”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!