10.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 13-24<br />

SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE OF BAPTISM<br />

AS AN EXAMPLE OF HIS DIALECTIC OF<br />

EXPERIENCE AND HISTORY<br />

C. Robert Hogg, Jr<br />

In his work on Protestant theology in the nineteenth century, Karl Barth<br />

noted that the theology of F. D. E. Schleiermacher moves between two<br />

poles: experience and history. 1 We may expand this insight by saying that<br />

history is the sphere of the church as the believing community. The church<br />

played a very important function in the theology of Schleiermacher. The<br />

church is the gathering of those who have experienced the influence of the<br />

Redeemer in their lives. Indeed, even the Scripture is normative only<br />

inasmuch as it is the first statement of the church’s experience of the<br />

Redeemer. It does not possess authority intrinsically. 2 And when the term<br />

“church” is used here, it does not have reference to some denomination or<br />

other (all of which will pass away); but as stated above, the term “church”<br />

refers to all believers in Christ the Redeemer. History is one pole of<br />

Schleiermacher’s thought because it is the sphere or arena in which the<br />

individual relates to others who have experienced the forgiving influence of<br />

Jesus the Redeemer.<br />

The other pole of Schleiermacher’s thought is experience. Experience is<br />

the sphere of God as the Being corresponding to man’s feeling of absolute<br />

dependence. In Christianity it is, more specifically, the sphere of the<br />

individual’s experience of Jesus as Redeemer. Schleiermacher’s experiences<br />

in Pietism and his involvement in the early history of the Romantic<br />

movement in Germany both played key roles in the formation of his thought<br />

in this area. 3<br />

The common factor in both poles of Schleiermacher’s thought is the<br />

individual; more specifically, the individual’s experience of the feeling of<br />

absolute dependence (§1-61 of The Christian Faith); the individual’s<br />

experience of the fragmentary nature of this experience in himself, or sin<br />

(§62-85); and the individual’s experience of the restoration of this feeling<br />

1 Karl Barth, Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century (Valley Forge, PA: Judson<br />

Press, 1973) 450.<br />

2 Note the remarkable statement in F. D. E. Schleiermacher (Philadelphia: Fortress<br />

Press, 1976) The Christian Faith §128.3: “Hence throughout the whole of the foregoing<br />

exposition of faith we have assumed no more than faith itself, present in a feeling of need …<br />

and Scripture we have adduced only as expressing the same faith in detail … .”<br />

3 Martin Redeker’s Schleiermacher: Life and Thought (Philadelphia: Fortress Press,<br />

1973) is an excellent introduction and overview.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!