LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LTR IX (Academic Year 1996-97) 13-24<br />
SCHLEIERMACHER’S DOCTRINE OF BAPTISM<br />
AS AN EXAMPLE OF HIS DIALECTIC OF<br />
EXPERIENCE AND HISTORY<br />
C. Robert Hogg, Jr<br />
In his work on Protestant theology in the nineteenth century, Karl Barth<br />
noted that the theology of F. D. E. Schleiermacher moves between two<br />
poles: experience and history. 1 We may expand this insight by saying that<br />
history is the sphere of the church as the believing community. The church<br />
played a very important function in the theology of Schleiermacher. The<br />
church is the gathering of those who have experienced the influence of the<br />
Redeemer in their lives. Indeed, even the Scripture is normative only<br />
inasmuch as it is the first statement of the church’s experience of the<br />
Redeemer. It does not possess authority intrinsically. 2 And when the term<br />
“church” is used here, it does not have reference to some denomination or<br />
other (all of which will pass away); but as stated above, the term “church”<br />
refers to all believers in Christ the Redeemer. History is one pole of<br />
Schleiermacher’s thought because it is the sphere or arena in which the<br />
individual relates to others who have experienced the forgiving influence of<br />
Jesus the Redeemer.<br />
The other pole of Schleiermacher’s thought is experience. Experience is<br />
the sphere of God as the Being corresponding to man’s feeling of absolute<br />
dependence. In Christianity it is, more specifically, the sphere of the<br />
individual’s experience of Jesus as Redeemer. Schleiermacher’s experiences<br />
in Pietism and his involvement in the early history of the Romantic<br />
movement in Germany both played key roles in the formation of his thought<br />
in this area. 3<br />
The common factor in both poles of Schleiermacher’s thought is the<br />
individual; more specifically, the individual’s experience of the feeling of<br />
absolute dependence (§1-61 of The Christian Faith); the individual’s<br />
experience of the fragmentary nature of this experience in himself, or sin<br />
(§62-85); and the individual’s experience of the restoration of this feeling<br />
1 Karl Barth, Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century (Valley Forge, PA: Judson<br />
Press, 1973) 450.<br />
2 Note the remarkable statement in F. D. E. Schleiermacher (Philadelphia: Fortress<br />
Press, 1976) The Christian Faith §128.3: “Hence throughout the whole of the foregoing<br />
exposition of faith we have assumed no more than faith itself, present in a feeling of need …<br />
and Scripture we have adduced only as expressing the same faith in detail … .”<br />
3 Martin Redeker’s Schleiermacher: Life and Thought (Philadelphia: Fortress Press,<br />
1973) is an excellent introduction and overview.