10.01.2015 Views

CORRIGENDUM No. 2 - Yap State Government

CORRIGENDUM No. 2 - Yap State Government

CORRIGENDUM No. 2 - Yap State Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

controller, meaning that each unit does not have the capacity to control battery charge as well as load<br />

output. As the SCS system has an inverter, there is no need for the charge controller to also control the<br />

load. Thus requesting a charge controller “for a load of 70A (in 48V – 3360W)” isn’t really relevant.<br />

According to our design, a 60A charge controller is more than sufficient to manage the current from the<br />

PV array which is the primary concern when choosing such components. Please specify whether this will<br />

be acceptable.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design.<br />

(k). Clarification Request #11:<br />

Will 24V nominal panels with 72 cells be considered Typically panels that are larger than 130W are 24V<br />

with 72 cells, and the requirements have allowed panels up to 185W.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design.<br />

(l). Clarification Request #12:<br />

For the SHS will 12V designs be considered If there are 12V DC loads to be used with the system, such as<br />

lights, then a system voltage of 12V would be beneficial and eliminate the need of a DC to DC converter<br />

within the system. It also opens up the range of inverters, as 24V 300W inverters are more difficult to find<br />

that 12V 300W inverters.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design.<br />

It is however possible that YSPSC might go for the 12V option therefore the charge controllers need to be<br />

able to work with 12V and with 24V.<br />

(m). Clarification Request #13:<br />

Regarding the panel warranty and the following excerpt from Annex II;<br />

The PV modules shall be warranted for at least 20 years and must not experience more than 15% of rated<br />

capacity reduction in output over their lifetime. They also shall be warranted for physical defect for a<br />

period of 10 years.<br />

Typically modules are supplied with 5 year physical defect warranty and 20 or 25 year warranty for a<br />

reduction in power output no greater than 20%. Please specify whether this standard warranty will be<br />

accepted If not please recommend a supplier offering a warranty for rated capacity reduction in output<br />

of only 15%.<br />

Response:<br />

The specifications are the basis of warranty guidelines that are to be met. However alternative warrantees<br />

shall be noted and will be considered but perhaps lead to a lower rating in the evaluation process if higher<br />

warrantees are offered by other tenderers.<br />

As per contract guidelines recommendations of specific suppliers meeting this warranty are not allowed.<br />

(n). Clarification Request #14:<br />

For the SHS both 10mm2 and 6mm2 cables have been specified, please state whether these are required<br />

to be double or single core cables<br />

Response:<br />

The SHS 10mm2 and 6mm2 cables are to be provided as per the specifications of “Annex II g.) wires,<br />

connectors and fuses” and “Annex III 1.8 Wires, connectors and fuses – Ref to g.)” and shall be standard<br />

and flexible insulated single core copper cables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!