10.01.2015 Views

CORRIGENDUM No. 2 - Yap State Government

CORRIGENDUM No. 2 - Yap State Government

CORRIGENDUM No. 2 - Yap State Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supply of off-grid PV solar packages including modules, batteries, electronics,<br />

wirings, etc., including transport to <strong>Yap</strong> main island.<br />

<br />

Publication Reference#: 132631<br />

Project Title: YSPSC EFII01 SOGPVSP<br />

<strong>CORRIGENDUM</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 2<br />

1 Instructions to Tenderers (c4b_itt_en_instruction to tenderers_<strong>Yap</strong>132631EFII)<br />

1. In the document Instructions to Tenderers (c4b_itt_en_instruction to<br />

tenderers_<strong>Yap</strong>132631EFII), changes are made as follows:<br />

(a). Instead of:<br />

“Point 21.7 The performance guarantee referred to in the General Conditions is set at five percent<br />

(5%) of the amount of the contract and must be presented in the form specified in the annex to the<br />

tender dossier. It will be released within 45 days of the issue of the final acceptance certificate by the<br />

Contracting Authority, except for the proportion assigned to after-sales service.”<br />

Read:<br />

“Point 21.7 The performance guarantee referred to in the General Conditions is set at ten percent<br />

(10%) of the amount of the contract and must be presented in the form specified in the annex to the<br />

tender dossier. It will be released within 45 days of the issue of the final acceptance certificate by the<br />

Contracting Authority, except for the proportion assigned to after-sales service.”<br />

The updated tender dossier is available from the following Internet address:<br />

https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/online-services/index.cfmdo=publi.welcome<br />

The tender dossier is also available from the Contracting Authority at the following internet addresses:<br />

https://sites.google.com/site/ef2yspsc/tender-dossier or http://www.yapstategov.org/bids.htm<br />

--- End of Document –


Supply of off-grid PV solar packages including modules, batteries, electronics,<br />

wirings, etc., including transport to <strong>Yap</strong> main island.<br />

<br />

Publication Reference#: 132631<br />

Project Title: YSPSC EFII01 SOGPVSP<br />

CLARIFICATIONS TO TENDERERS<br />

1 Tender Clarification Requests and Responses:<br />

I. Clarification Requests/Reponses<br />

II. (Attachment) PPA/SEAIPI Off Grid PV Power Systems Design Guidelines<br />

III. (Attachment) Letter of derogation # DEVCO/H3/BD/D (2011)<br />

1. Tender Clarification Requests and Responses:<br />

I. Clarification Requests/Reponses<br />

(a). Clarification Request #1:<br />

Annex III (Solar Batteries)<br />

As discussed with our production department on the Technical Sheet of 6V per battery requirement -<br />

"Each battery shall be a 6 volts DC (Vdc) in one robust container only, giving 6 V as nominal operating<br />

voltage; inter-cell connection shall not be exposed" - our battery is 2V per cells and provide inner-cell<br />

connector for battery bank but not produce as 6V in one robust container. Will such battery bank be<br />

acceptable<br />

Response:<br />

Yes, 6 volt or 2 volt cells will be accepted as long as the overall specifications are met.<br />

(b). Clarification Request #2:<br />

Annex III (Solar Batteries)<br />

We note that you required Flooded batteries, however will other types also be acceptable such as; GEL,<br />

ASTM, VRLA or other<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, only flooded batteries will be accepted.<br />

(c). Clarification Request #3:<br />

What is the exact delivery time– In the tender documents120 days as well as150 days are mentioned.<br />

Response:<br />

120 days, refer to Article 19 of the Special Conditions.<br />

(d). Clarification Request #4:<br />

Concerning the CD that shall accompany the offer – does it have to contain only the financial offer as a pdf<br />

or all documents of the offer


Response:<br />

The CD has to contain all submitted documents from the tenderer.<br />

(e). Clarification Request #5:<br />

It is nothing mentioned about the size of the containers to deliver the goods. Are there any requirements<br />

It is also not clear about the containers whether they are only used for delivering and going back to the<br />

tenderer or if you are going to keep them<br />

Response:<br />

Only 20’ containers can be accepted in <strong>Yap</strong> harbor. The containers can go back to the tenderer.<br />

(f). Clarification Request #6:<br />

PV Module Mounting Structure<br />

Can you please clarify if we also have to supply the post/poles for the array mounting structure<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the modules will be ground-mounted on a concrete structure prepared by YSPSC. It is however<br />

important to include the technical drawings of the proposed mounting structure.<br />

(g). Clarification Request #7:<br />

Charge Controllers<br />

For a SCS the charge controller is specified to be 70A at 48V. Our question is can we offer a lesser amps<br />

controller than 70A if our array voltage will be configured at higher voltage to charge the 48V battery bank<br />

via MPPT technology.<br />

Response:<br />

You can offer an alternative design that we can look into however the official proposal needs to comply<br />

with the requested specs. <strong>No</strong>te that the specifications ask for a 48 V system and 3,360 Wp. It is however,<br />

possible to parallel 2 or 3 charge controllers, if this is recommended by the manufacturer. Please refer to<br />

point e.8 of Annex II.<br />

(h). Clarification Request #8:<br />

Wires, connectors and fuses<br />

Could please specify the cable run between the PV Module to Charge controller and the cable run<br />

between charge controller and battery for the SCS<br />

Response:<br />

The tender documents ask the tenderer under point g.2 to specify the wire sizes for the SCS with the note<br />

that “All wiring must be sized to keep line voltage losses to less than two percent (2%) in each sub-circuit<br />

and to allow the circuit to operate at a maximum of 60deg Celsius within the ampacity rating of the cable.”<br />

Voltage drop calculations need to be included in the proposal.<br />

(i). Clarification Request #9:<br />

Will 12V batteries be considered as well (e.g. 12V 190Ah for SHS)<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design. For now only 6V and<br />

2V batteries will be accepted.<br />

(j). Clarification Request #10:<br />

Typically larger charge controllers (45A and above), function only as a charge controller or a load


controller, meaning that each unit does not have the capacity to control battery charge as well as load<br />

output. As the SCS system has an inverter, there is no need for the charge controller to also control the<br />

load. Thus requesting a charge controller “for a load of 70A (in 48V – 3360W)” isn’t really relevant.<br />

According to our design, a 60A charge controller is more than sufficient to manage the current from the<br />

PV array which is the primary concern when choosing such components. Please specify whether this will<br />

be acceptable.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design.<br />

(k). Clarification Request #11:<br />

Will 24V nominal panels with 72 cells be considered Typically panels that are larger than 130W are 24V<br />

with 72 cells, and the requirements have allowed panels up to 185W.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design.<br />

(l). Clarification Request #12:<br />

For the SHS will 12V designs be considered If there are 12V DC loads to be used with the system, such as<br />

lights, then a system voltage of 12V would be beneficial and eliminate the need of a DC to DC converter<br />

within the system. It also opens up the range of inverters, as 24V 300W inverters are more difficult to find<br />

that 12V 300W inverters.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong>, the specs need to comply with the technical tender document. We have left a window open to send<br />

besides the offer that follows the set specification to propose and alternative design.<br />

It is however possible that YSPSC might go for the 12V option therefore the charge controllers need to be<br />

able to work with 12V and with 24V.<br />

(m). Clarification Request #13:<br />

Regarding the panel warranty and the following excerpt from Annex II;<br />

The PV modules shall be warranted for at least 20 years and must not experience more than 15% of rated<br />

capacity reduction in output over their lifetime. They also shall be warranted for physical defect for a<br />

period of 10 years.<br />

Typically modules are supplied with 5 year physical defect warranty and 20 or 25 year warranty for a<br />

reduction in power output no greater than 20%. Please specify whether this standard warranty will be<br />

accepted If not please recommend a supplier offering a warranty for rated capacity reduction in output<br />

of only 15%.<br />

Response:<br />

The specifications are the basis of warranty guidelines that are to be met. However alternative warrantees<br />

shall be noted and will be considered but perhaps lead to a lower rating in the evaluation process if higher<br />

warrantees are offered by other tenderers.<br />

As per contract guidelines recommendations of specific suppliers meeting this warranty are not allowed.<br />

(n). Clarification Request #14:<br />

For the SHS both 10mm2 and 6mm2 cables have been specified, please state whether these are required<br />

to be double or single core cables<br />

Response:<br />

The SHS 10mm2 and 6mm2 cables are to be provided as per the specifications of “Annex II g.) wires,<br />

connectors and fuses” and “Annex III 1.8 Wires, connectors and fuses – Ref to g.)” and shall be standard<br />

and flexible insulated single core copper cables.


(o). Clarification Request #15:<br />

REFERENCE IS MADE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ITEM 1.2 AND ITEM 2.2 (MOUNTING RAILS): Please<br />

clarify how the mounting rails should be done. Have they to be deemed for ground mounting or roof<br />

mounting In case of ground mounting please clarify if a steel or aluminium pole must be supplied.<br />

Response:<br />

The tender dossier states that the panels will be ground mounted – see Annex II-specifications b.2 and b.3.<br />

<strong>No</strong> poles need to be provided as the footing (poles) will be made of concrete and completed by YSPSC. The<br />

tenderer will have to send, however, their technical drawing of the mounting structure they propose. – see<br />

Annex II-specifications b.3.<br />

(p). Clarification Request #16:<br />

REFERENCE IS MADE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS: Please clarify if the inverters and charge controller<br />

must be mounted on an electrical control board. If so should the supplier deliver them pre-mounted on<br />

the electrical board or the end users will take care of mounting Moreover, in case of electrical board are<br />

to be supplied which kind of electrical board do you need Which would be the IP protection number<br />

Response:<br />

The design of the PV system is up to the tenderer and the most appropriate design will be selected. Please<br />

note that we follow the technical guidelines for the pacific islands for the design, find attached a copy of<br />

these guidelines.<br />

(q). Clarification Request #17:<br />

REFERENCE IS MADE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS<br />

Should the bidder supply earth grounding with earth rod<br />

Response:<br />

Yes, see technical guide and the NEC electrical code for off-grid PV installations.<br />

(r). Clarification Request #18:<br />

REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE TENDER SCOPE: Does the contract include installation or only delivery CIF In<br />

case the contract includes installation please send us the list of installation sites.<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong> installation is required under this tender.<br />

(s). Clarification Request #19:<br />

REFERENCE IS MADE TO INVERTERS QUANTITY: Please confirm that inverter quantities is 400 and -in any<br />

case - a 10% extra inverter must be included as spare parts<br />

Response:<br />

The requested quantity is 400 Sinewave inverters 24Vdc 120 Vac 60Hz 300W plus 10% spares and 20 Sine<br />

wave inverter 48Vdc 120Vac 60Hz 3000W plus 10% spares<br />

(t). Clarification Request #20:<br />

Rules of Origin: Clause 3 of Instructions to Tenderers.<br />

Please provide list of countries applicable for this project. Could you provide us with the copy of the<br />

Reference note of derogation # DEVCO/H3/BD/D (2011)<br />

Response:<br />

See the attached copy of the “Letter of Derogation”:


(u). Clarification Request #21:<br />

Photovoltaic Modules – a.4);<br />

PV modules must be framed with marine graded aluminum. I believe this refers to Anodized Aluminum<br />

frame<br />

Response:<br />

Anodized Aluminum will also be accepted<br />

(v). Clarification Request #22:<br />

Photovoltaic Modules – a.4);<br />

NEC requires PV Power Source to have Disconnect Switches, is this required for this project<br />

Response:<br />

Yes – All NEC guidelines must be followed<br />

(w). Clarification Request #23:<br />

Photovoltaic Modules – a.4);<br />

Confirm that PV Structure will be grounded using grounding bolts, lugs & screws<br />

Response:<br />

Correct<br />

(x). Clarification Request #24:<br />

Photovoltaic Modules – a.4);<br />

Please confirm if these structures will be mounted on a concrete pad embedded in ground<br />

Response:<br />

The systems will be installed on concrete poles. The poles will be prepared by YSPSC but the tenderer must<br />

provide the technical drawings of the mounting requirements for the system that they are proposing<br />

(y). Clarification Request #25:<br />

Solar Batteries;<br />

Will batteries with higher number of cycles be given preference over the price<br />

Response:<br />

Yes – All components must meet and/or exceed tender dossier specification<br />

(z). Clarification Request #26:<br />

Solar Batteries;<br />

Will batteries that have never been used in Pacific Island be considered if they meet the specifications are<br />

better priced over the battery that has proven track record in Pacific Island but may be higher in price<br />

Response:<br />

Yes – All components must meet and/or exceed tender dossier specification<br />

(aa). Clarification Request #27:<br />

Solar Batteries;<br />

Will batteries be given preference with 5 years Guarantee instead of warranty<br />

Response:<br />

Refer to the tender specifications for batteries that shall be follow and require a “warranty”


(bb). Clarification Request #28:<br />

Solar Batteries;<br />

NEC requires each equipment to have disconnect switch, is this required for this project<br />

Response:<br />

All NEC guidelines must be followed. All main components shall be able to be disconnected by a breaker<br />

and/or disconnect switch<br />

(cc). Clarification Request #29:<br />

Solar Batteries;<br />

Any preference on Battery Casing – transparent, clear etc<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>No</strong> preference is given to the color of the battery casing, but note that the acid level must be visible from<br />

outside.<br />

(dd). Clarification Request #30:<br />

Battery Enclosures;<br />

Will the Batteries be installed indoors or outdoors<br />

Response:<br />

Outdoors<br />

(ee). Clarification Request #31:<br />

Battery Enclosures;<br />

Any specific requirement for Battery Enclosure Material<br />

Response:<br />

The battery enclosure must have a long lifetime and must be suitable for outdoor marine environment<br />

usage.<br />

(ff). Clarification Request #32:<br />

Battery Enclosures;<br />

Do you intend to attach the Enclosure to the wall or floor or it will be just sitting on the ground etc<br />

Response:<br />

On the ground<br />

(gg). Clarification Request #33:<br />

Charge Controllers (SHS & SCS);<br />

Will MPPT Charge Controllers be considered for this project, MPPT Charge controllers are more efficient<br />

but there is cost difference as well<br />

Response:<br />

Yes<br />

(hh). Clarification Request #34:<br />

Charge Controllers (SHS & SCS);<br />

Is Battery Temperature Sensor required for temperature compensation charging, this will be of great help<br />

due to temperature variance<br />

Response:<br />

Refer to the requirements in the technical specifications for charge controllers. For the SCS a battery sensor<br />

would be required


(ii). Clarification Request #35:<br />

Since the panels will be installed outside and the controller inside, do we have to provide disconnect<br />

switches at the Array and also before the Charge Controller Entry. This means 2 disconnection points<br />

between the PV Array and Charge Controller. Please confirm.<br />

Response:<br />

Refer to the tender specifications for your systems designs for installation. These systems are to be<br />

packaged component stand-alone outside compact systems which are to be installed as complete units<br />

externally from the location being served by each system. All NEC guidelines must be followed as needed<br />

for design. Follow the instructions and you can include changes and/or additions in your design for<br />

evaluation.<br />

(jj). Clarification Request #36:<br />

As per the NEC guidelines, we can isolate one conductor and ground the other conductor or isolate both<br />

current carrying conductors by using appropriate circuit breakers. Please confirm if we can to supply these<br />

isolators / disconnection devices with this tender<br />

Response:<br />

All NEC and SEIAPI technical guidelines must be followed for design of stand-alone system. The guidelines<br />

are available online and have been attached with this email. The tenderer must design the system<br />

following these guidelines.<br />

(kk). Clarification Request #37:<br />

We have a question regarding the mounting structures for the modules.<br />

Will they be rammed into the ground or will there be a concrete foundation<br />

Response:<br />

The systems will be installed on concrete poles. The poles will be prepared by YSPSC but the tenderer<br />

proposal must provide the technical drawings for the poles along with the mounting requirements for the<br />

system/s that they are proposing.<br />

(ll). Clarification Request #38:<br />

Since SCS will be installed outside (compact installation)<br />

please confirm if both the controllers, inverters and all other accessories to be installed outside<br />

Response:<br />

SCS to be outside and please refer to the complete tender dossier and especially the documents of<br />

“Instruction for Tenderers” long with “Annex II” for definition of “PV solar packages” and “complete”<br />

system for both the SCS/SHS. All system components to be included with such.<br />

(mm). Clarification Request #39:<br />

Is SHS also a compact system with controllers and inverters mounted outdoors<br />

Response:<br />

Correct and again please refer to tender document Annex II item “h).” which provides guide to the region<br />

and conditions of the where these systems will be installed. Reference to “<strong>Yap</strong>, Federated <strong>State</strong>s of<br />

Micronesia” is made and which also encompasses the outer islands of the state of <strong>Yap</strong>, FSM. Research and<br />

becoming familiar with this region and the conditions that can be encountered is strongly encouraged.<br />

(nn). Clarification Request #40:<br />

Confirmation on Tender Guarantee<br />

If TG is submitted in another form, say Bank Guarantee or Bank Draft, will the company be disqualified<br />

from the tendering process


Response:<br />

The tender dossier requires that EU “Tender Guarantee Form” format must be used and submitted with the<br />

tender proposal<br />

(oo). Clarification Request #41:<br />

“Continuous Power at 25°C minimum 300W – maximum 400W”<br />

We can offer an Inverter with this value expressed in [VA] instead of [W]. Due to the missing data on<br />

number and type of devices that will be loaded by the grid-off plants, we cannot give the value for<br />

Continuous power expressed in [W]. Would you please be so kind to tell us if the range of Continuous<br />

power of 650-800 [VA] will be good as well.<br />

Exactly the same thing we would like to know regarding the technical specification for SCS plants as<br />

follows:<br />

“Continuous Power at 25°C minimum 3000W – max.3500W”<br />

Our proposal for the Continuous power is 5000 [VA] .Could it be suitable for SCS needs<br />

Response:<br />

It is acceptable to express the inverter values in “VA” as well as “W”. The ratings shall be within the<br />

guideline ranges as noted in the specifications of Annex II f.1) and f.2). Each tenderer must conclude to the<br />

best of their knowledge the best practiced design and component/materials provision meeting the<br />

specified guidelines. The overall design and technical specifications will be given preference and systems<br />

with established histories of performance shall be preferred.<br />

(pp). Clarification Request #42:<br />

Equipment delivery must be carried out in kits, in a grouped format, or it can be delivered each of their<br />

components separately: panels, regulators, inverters, batteries and accessories.”<br />

Response:<br />

Reference to “Equipment Delivery in kits” is not found & therefore refer to Annex II document (Annex II -<br />

Specificationsv2_final) related to this components delivery question as to be “supplies are to be made in<br />

one lot and to be delivered….”<br />

(qq). Clarification Request #43:<br />

At point a.3) of technical specifications standard IEEE 1262 is required<br />

IEEE 1262 served its purpose as the first consensus qualification test standard for thin film modules but, in<br />

this tender, are silicon types. Therefore, the standard IEEE 1262 is not applicable.<br />

Response:<br />

This is a United <strong>State</strong>s informational standard basis for PV panels that tenderers shall refer to for<br />

establishing their proposal submissions and is for reference purposes. Any subsequent standard/s for PV<br />

module qualification guidelines that have replaced and/or succeeded prior recommended practices shall be<br />

the responsibility of the tenderer and shall be followed.


II.<br />

(Attachment) PPA/SEAIPI Off Grid PV Power Systems Design Guidelines<br />

PPA/SEAIPI Off Grid PV<br />

Power Systems Design<br />

Guidelines


OFF GRID PV POWER SYSTEMS<br />

SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINES<br />

These guidelines have been developed by the Sustainable Energy Industry Association of the Pacific Islands in<br />

Collaboration with the Pacific Power Association<br />

They represent latest industry BEST PRACTICE for the design and installation of PV Grid Connect Systems.<br />

© Copyright 2012<br />

While all care has been taken to ensure this guideline is free from omission and error, no responsibility can be taken<br />

for the use of this information in the design of any PV grid connect system.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012


GENERAL<br />

The design of any off-grid system should consider, other than the electrical load, a number of criteria such as:<br />

o Budget<br />

o Acceptable genset runtime<br />

o Power quality<br />

o <strong>No</strong>ise levels<br />

o Environmental impact<br />

o Site accessibility<br />

o Aesthetics<br />

o Level of automation<br />

<strong>No</strong>te: This guidelines are based on d.c. bus systems and do not include the new a.c. bus hybrid systems currently available. Guidelines dedicated to<br />

hybrid Systems will be developed.<br />

ENERGY SOURCE MATCHING<br />

Heating and lighting should be supplied from the most appropriate source. For example -<br />

o cooking - gas or wood burning stove<br />

o water heating - solar water heating with gas or wood backup<br />

o Lighting - electrical lighting most often used but natural light ( daylighting ) should be considered.<br />

ENERGY EFFICIENCY<br />

All appliances should be chosen for the lowest possible energy consumption for each desired outcome, such<br />

as<br />

o High efficiency lighting<br />

o Energy efficient refrigeration<br />

STANDARDS for DESIGN<br />

System designs should follow any standards that are typically applied in the country or region where the solar<br />

installation will occur. The following lists the relevant standards in Australia, New Zealand and USA They are<br />

listed because some Pacific island countries and territories do follow those standards. These standards are<br />

often updated and amended so the latest version should always be applied.<br />

In Australia and New Zealand the main standards required include:<br />

o AS/NZS3000 Wiring Rules<br />

o AS/NZS4509 Stand-alone power systems<br />

o AS 4086.2 Secondary batteries for stand-alone power supplies<br />

o AS/NZS5033 PV Array<br />

o AS 3010.1 Electrical Installations - Supply Generating set<br />

o AS 1768 Lightning Protection<br />

o AS 3595 Energy management programs<br />

o AS 1359.51 <strong>No</strong>ise level limits<br />

In USA PV systems must be in accordance with the following codes and standards:<br />

o Electrical Codes-National Electrical Code Article 690:Solar Photovoltaic Systems and NFPA 70<br />

Uniform Solar Energy Code<br />

o Building Codes- ICC, ASCE 7<br />

o<br />

o<br />

UL Standard 1701: Flat Plat Photovoltaic Modules and Panels<br />

UL Standard 1741: Standard for Inverter, converters, Controllers and Interconnection System<br />

Equipment for use with Distributed Energy Resources<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 1


INTRODUCTION<br />

Four major issues arise when designing a system:<br />

1. the load (power) required to be supplied by the system is not constant over the period of one day;<br />

2. the daily energy usage varies over the year;<br />

3. the energy available from the PV array may vary from time to time during the day;<br />

4. the energy available from the PV array will vary from day to day during the year.<br />

Since the system is based on photovoltaic modules, then a comparison should be undertaken between the<br />

available energy from the sun and the actual energy demands The worst month is when the ratio between<br />

solar energy available and energy demand is smallest.<br />

The design of an off-grid power requires a number of steps. A basic design method follows:<br />

1. Determination of the energy usage that the system must supply.<br />

2. Determination of the battery storage required.<br />

3. Determination of the energy input required from the PV array or other sources (eg battery<br />

charger/generator)<br />

4. Selection of the remainder of system components.<br />

LOAD (ENERGY) ASSESSMENT<br />

Electrical power is supplied from the batteries (DC) or via an inverter to produce either 230 volts AC (South<br />

Pacific) or 110 / 120 volts AC (<strong>No</strong>rth Pacific). Electrical energy usage is normally expressed in watt hours (Wh)<br />

or kilowatt hours ( kWh ).<br />

To determine the daily energy usage for an appliance, multiply the power of the appliance by the number of<br />

hours per day it will operate. The result is the energy (Wh) consumed by that appliance per day.<br />

Appliances can either be DC or AC. An energy assessment should be undertaken for each type, examples of<br />

these are shown in tables 1 and 2.<br />

You need to calculate the electrical energy usage with the customer. Many systems have failed over the years<br />

not because the equipment has failed or the system was installed incorrectly, BUT BECAUSE THE<br />

CUSTOMER BELIEVED THEY COULD GET MORE ENERGY FROM THEIR SYSTEM THAN THE SYSTEM<br />

COULD DELIVER. It failed because the customer was unaware of the power/energy limitations of the<br />

system.<br />

The problem is that the customer may not want to spend the time determining their realistic power and energy<br />

needs which is required to successfully complete a load assessment form. They just want to know: How much<br />

for a system to power my lights and TV<br />

A system designer can only design a system to meet the power and energy needs of the customer. The<br />

system designer must therefore use this process to understand the needs of the customer and at the same<br />

time educate the customer. Completing a load assessment form correctly (Refer to table 1 and 2 below) does<br />

take time; you may need to spend 1 to 2 hours or more with the potential customer completing the tables. It is<br />

during this process that you will discuss all the potential sources of energy that can meet their energy needs<br />

and you can educate the customer on energy efficiency.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 2


Worked Example<br />

Table 1 DC Load (energy) Assessment<br />

(1) (2) (3) (4a) (5a) (4b) (5b) (6) Comments<br />

dry season wet season Contribution<br />

Power<br />

to maximum<br />

Appliance Number<br />

Usage Energy Usage Energy demand<br />

Time<br />

Time<br />

W h Wh h Wh W<br />

Light 4 7 4 112 4 112 28<br />

Daily Load energy-d.c loads (Wh) ( DC 7a) 112 (DC 7b) 112<br />

Maximum d.c. demand (W) (DC 8) 28<br />

Table 2 AC Load (energy) Assessment<br />

(1) (2) (3) (4a) (5a) (4b) (5b) (6) (7) (8) (9a) (9b)<br />

dry season wet season<br />

Contribution<br />

Contribution to<br />

Power<br />

to max<br />

surge demand<br />

Appliance <strong>No</strong>.<br />

Power demand Surge Potential Design<br />

Usage<br />

Time<br />

Energy Usage<br />

Time<br />

Energy Factor<br />

Factor<br />

Comments<br />

W h Wh h Wh VA VA VA<br />

TV 100 3 300 3 300 0.8 125 4 500 125<br />

Refrigerator 100 12 1200 12 1200 0.8 125 4 500 500 Duty cycle of<br />

0.5 included<br />

Daily Load Energy A.C<br />

1500<br />

1500<br />

Loads (Wh) (AC10a)<br />

(AC10b)<br />

maximum demand (VA) (AC11) 250 1000<br />

Surge demand (VA) (AC12) 625<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 3


In the worked example on the previous page, the TV and refrigerator are using AC electricity so we have to<br />

take into account the efficiency of the inverter. Typically the peak efficiency of the inverter may be over 90%<br />

but in many systems the inverter will sometimes be running when there is very little load on the inverter, so the<br />

average efficiency is about 85% to 90%. Then we must divide the total AC energy used by this figure to obtain<br />

the energy required to be supplied to the inverter from the battery bank.<br />

For the worked example assume the efficiency of the chosen inverter is 90%.<br />

Daily battery load (energy) from AC loads = 1500Wh ÷ 0.9 = 1667 Wh<br />

Daily battery load (energy) from DC loads = 112 Wh<br />

To get the total load(energy) as seen by the battery, you add the two figures together:<br />

1667 + 112= 1779Wh<br />

If there are no AC loads, then you only have to work out the load from the DC appliances, and not include the<br />

inverter (or the inverter efficiency).<br />

BATTERY SELECTION<br />

DETERMINATION OF SYSTEM VOLTAGE<br />

System voltages are generally 12, 24 or 48 Volts. The actual voltage is determined by the requirements of the<br />

system. For example, if the batteries and the inverter are a long way from the energy source then a higher<br />

voltage may be required to minimise power loss in the cables. In larger systems 120V or 240V DC could be<br />

used, but these are not typical household systems.<br />

As a general rule, the recommended system voltage increases as the total load increases. For small daily<br />

loads, a 12V system voltage can be used. For intermediate daily loads, 24V is used and for larger loads 48V is<br />

used.<br />

1 kWh 3-4 kWh<br />

Use 12 Volt<br />

system voltage<br />

Use 24 Volt<br />

system voltage<br />

Use 48 Volt<br />

system voltage<br />

The changes over points are roughly at daily loads of 1 kWh and 3-4 kWh but this will also be dependent on<br />

the actual power profile.<br />

One of the general limitations is that maximum continuous current being drawn from the battery should not be<br />

greater than 150A.<br />

BATTERY SIZING<br />

To convert Watt-hours (Wh) to Amp-hours (Ah) you need to divide by the battery system voltage.<br />

For the worked example the daily energy usage was 1779Wh , so we select a battery system voltage of 24<br />

Volts.<br />

This means that the daily Ah demand on the batteries will be:<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 4


Ah = Wh ÷ system voltage 1779Wh ÷ 24 = 74 Ah<br />

So at the moment the minimum size battery to meet the daily energy requirements in the example is: 74Ah<br />

Battery capacity is determined by whichever is the greater of the following two requirements:<br />

1. The ability of the battery to meet the energy demand of the system, often for a few days, sometimes<br />

specified as ‘days of autonomy’ of the system;<br />

OR<br />

2. The ability of the battery to supply peak power demand.<br />

The critical design parameters include:<br />

Parameters relating to the energy requirements of the battery:<br />

a) Daily energy demand<br />

b) Daily and maximum depth of discharge<br />

c) Number of days of autonomy<br />

Parameters relating to the discharge power (current) of the battery:<br />

a) Maximum power demand<br />

b) Surge demand<br />

Parameters relating to the charging of the battery:<br />

a) Maximum Charging Current<br />

Based on the these parameters there are a number of factors that will increase the battery capacity in order to<br />

provide satisfactory performance. These correction factors must be considered.<br />

1. Days of Autonomy<br />

Extra capacity is necessary where the loads require power during periods of reduced input. The battery<br />

bank is often sized to provide for a number of days autonomy. A common period selected is 5 days.<br />

Where a generator is operating on a regular basis the autonomous period can be reduced.<br />

In other cases, where there is no auxiliary charging source, the period of autonomy is often increased to 7<br />

days or more.<br />

For the worked example assume 5 days autonomy .<br />

ADJUSTED<br />

Battery Capacity = 74 x 5 = 370 Ah<br />

2. Maximum Depth of Discharge<br />

Battery manufacturers recommend a maximum depth of discharge (DOD). If this is regularly exceeded the<br />

life of the battery is severely reduced. This could be 50% or for some solar batteries as high as 80%.<br />

For the worked example Assume a maximum DOD of 70%.<br />

ADJUSTED<br />

Battery Capacity = 370 ÷ 0.7 = 529 Ah<br />

3. Battery Discharge Rate<br />

The actual discharge rate selected is highly dependent on the power usage rates of connected loads. Many<br />

appliances operate for short periods only, drawing power for minutes rather than hours. This affects the battery<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 5


selected, as battery capacity varies with discharge rate. Information such as a power usage profile over the<br />

course of an average day is required for an estimate of the appropriate discharge rate.<br />

For small systems this is often impractical.<br />

Where the average rates of power usage are low, the battery capacity for 5 days autonomy is often selected at<br />

the 100hr rate of discharge for the battery.<br />

For the worked example<br />

ADJUSTED<br />

Battery Capacity = 529 Ah (@ C 100 )<br />

Where average power usage rates are high, it may be necessary to select the battery capacity for 5 days<br />

autonomy at a higher discharge rate. eg. the 10 (C 10 ) or 20hr (C 20 ) rate<br />

4. Battery Temperature derating<br />

Battery capacity is affected by temperature. As the temperature goes down, the battery capacity reduces. The<br />

following graph gives a battery correction factor for low temperature operation. <strong>No</strong>te that the temperature<br />

correction factor is 1 at 25°C as this is the tempe rature at which battery capacity is specified.<br />

In the tropics it is often still 20°C+ in the even ings so unless the system is located in a mountainous region<br />

that does get cold then ignore the temperature derating. If you want to be conservative add 5% to the capacity<br />

to allow for this factor.<br />

BATTERY SELECTION<br />

Deep discharge type batteries / cells should be selected for the required system voltage and capacity in a<br />

single series string of battery cells.<br />

Parallel strings of batteries are not recommended.<br />

Where this is necessary each string must be separately fused.<br />

For the worked example a battery of at least 529 Ah (@C 100 ) should be used.<br />

PV ARRAY SIZING- Standard Switched Controllers<br />

The calculation for determining the size of the PV array is dependent on the type of controller used. Historically<br />

standard switched controllers were the most common controllers used. In recent years a number of maximum<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 6


power point trackers (MPPT) have become available. This section determines how to size the PV array based<br />

on switched controllers based on the PV array meeting the daily load requirements all year. Later in the guide<br />

is a section on how to size a PV array using a MPPT.<br />

The size of the PV array should be selected to take account of:<br />

seasonal variation of solar irradiation<br />

seasonal variation of the daily energy usage<br />

battery efficiency<br />

manufacturing tolerance of modules<br />

dirt<br />

temperature of array (the effective cell temperature)<br />

Solar irradiation data is available from various sources. Some countries have data available from their<br />

respective meteorological department. One source for solar irradiation data is the NASA website:<br />

http:/eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/sse/. RETSCREEN, a program available from Canada, incorporates the NASA<br />

data and it is easier to use. Please note that the NASA data has, in some instances, had higher irradiation<br />

figures than that recorded by ground collection data in some countries. but if there is no other data available it<br />

is data that can be used.<br />

Solar irradiation is typically provided as kWh/m 2 however it can be stated as daily peak Sun Hours (PSH). This<br />

is the equivalent number of hours of solar irradiance of 1kW/m 2 .<br />

Attachment 1 provides data on the following sites:<br />

• Suva, Fiji (Latitude 18°08 ′S Longitude 178°25 ′E)<br />

• Apia, Samoa (Latitude 13 o 50' S' Longitude 171 o 44' W)<br />

• Port Vila, Vanuatu (Latitude 17° 44' S Longitude 168° 19' E)<br />

• Tarawa, Kiribati (Latitude 1°28'N, Longitude 173°2 'E)<br />

• Raratonga, Cook islands( Latitude 21°30'S, Longitude 160°0'W)<br />

• Nuku’alofa, Tonga (Latitude 21º14'S Longitude 175º22'W)<br />

• Honiara, Solomon Islands (Latitude 09°27'S, Lon gitude 159°57'E)<br />

• Koror ,Palau ( Latitude 7°20’N Longitude 134°28'E)<br />

• Ponapei, Pohnpei FSM (Latitude: 6°54'N, Longitude : 158°13'E)<br />

• Majuro, Marshall Islands (Latitude: 7º 12N, Longitude 171º 06E)<br />

• Alofi, Niue (Latitude 19°04' S. Longitude 169° 55' W)<br />

• Nauru (Latitude 0º55’S, Longitude 166º 91’E)<br />

• Tuvalu (Latitude 8°31 ′S, Longitude 179°13 ′E)<br />

• Hagåtña, Guam (Latitude 13°28 ′N Longitude: 144°45 ′E)<br />

• <strong>No</strong>umea, New Caledonia (Latitude 22°16 ′S Longitude: 166°27 ′E)<br />

• Pago Pago, American Samoa (Latitude 14°16 ′ S Longitude: 170°42 ′W)<br />

The variation of both the solar irradiation and the load energy requirement should be considered. If there is no<br />

variation in daily load between the various times of the year then the system should be designed on the month<br />

with the lowest irradiation that is peak sun hours (PSH).<br />

DAILY ENERGY REQUIREMENT FROM THE PV ARRAY<br />

In order to determine the energy required from the PV array, it is necessary to increase the energy from the<br />

battery bank to account for battery efficiency.<br />

.<br />

The average columbic efficiency (in terms of Ah) of a new battery is 90% (variations in battery voltage are not<br />

considered).<br />

For the worked example the daily energy requirement expressed in Ah from the battery is 74 Ah. Allowing for<br />

the battery efficiency, the solar array then needs to produce…<br />

74 Ah ÷ 0.9 = 82.2 Ah<br />

Assume the worst months PSH is 5.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 7


Therefore the required PV array output current is:<br />

82.2 Ah ÷ 5 PSH = 16.5 A<br />

OVERSIZE FACTOR<br />

If the system does not include a fuel generator which can provide extra charging to the battery bank then the<br />

solar array should be oversized to provide the equalisation charging of the battery bank. In Australia and New<br />

Zealand this is between 30% and 100%. It is recommended in the Pacific that this is 10%.<br />

For the worked example the adjusted array output current is:<br />

16.5A x 1.1 = 18.1 A<br />

DERATING MODULE PERFORMANCE<br />

The PV array will be de-rated due to:<br />

• Manufacturer’s Tolerance: Most manufacturers rate their modules ± a percentage (eg ±3%) or wattage<br />

(eg ±2W). Unless every module is tested and its actual rating is known then the modules should be derated<br />

by the manufacturer’s tolerance.<br />

• Dirt: Over a period of time dirt or salt (if located near the coast) can build up on the array and reduce<br />

the output. The output of the module should therefore be derated to reflect this soiling. The actual value<br />

will be dependent on the site but this can vary from 0.9 to 1 (i.e. up to 10% loss due to dirt).<br />

• Temperature: Modules’ output power decreases with temperature above 25°C and increases with<br />

temperatures below 25°C. The average cell temperatu re will be higher than the ambient because of the<br />

glass on the front of the module and the fact that the module absorbs some heat from the sun. The<br />

output power and/or current of the module must be based on the effective temperature of the cell. This<br />

is determined by the following formula:<br />

T cell-eff = T a.day + 25°C<br />

Where<br />

T cell-eff = the average daily effective cell temperature in degrees Celsius (°C)<br />

T a.day = the daytime average ambient temperature for the month that the sizing is being undertaken.<br />

Since the modules are used for battery charging, the current at 14 Volts (a good battery charging voltage) at<br />

the effective cell temperature should be used in calculations. If curves are unavailable to determine the current<br />

at effective cell temperature then use the <strong>No</strong>rmal Operating Cell temperature (NOCT) provided by the<br />

manufacturers.<br />

Therefore the derated module output current is calculated as follows:<br />

The Current of the module at 14V and effective cell temperature (or NOCT current)<br />

multiplied by derating due to manufacturers tolerance<br />

multiplied by derating due to dirt<br />

I (NOCT) x f man x f dirt<br />

If a module has a 3% (0.03) manufacturers tolerance, then the module current is derated by multiplying by<br />

0.97 (1-0.03).<br />

If a module has a 5% (0.05) loss due to dirt then the module current is derated by multiplying by 0.95 (1-0.05).<br />

For the worked example the selected module has a peak rating of 80W P .<br />

An 80 watt solar module (still used in many small off-grid systems) typically has the following data:<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 8


Table 3: 80 W module data<br />

Rated Power<br />

80W<br />

Power Tolerance ± 5%<br />

<strong>No</strong>minal Voltage<br />

12V<br />

Maximum Power Voltage, V mp 17.6V<br />

Maximum Power Current, I mp 4.55A<br />

Open Circuit Voltage, V oc 22.1V<br />

Short Circuit Current, I sc 4.8A<br />

NOCT<br />

47±2°C<br />

Current at 14V and NOCT 4.75A<br />

Assuming a 5% dirt derating then the adjusted output current of the above module is:<br />

ADJUSTED<br />

Module current = I (NOCT) x 0.95 ( ← minus 5% for manufactures tol) x 0.95 ( ← minus 5% for dirt)<br />

= 4.75A x 0.95 x 0.95 = 4.29A<br />

NUMBER OF MODULES REQUIRED IN ARRAY<br />

First determine number of modules in series, To do this divide the system voltage by the nominal operating<br />

voltage of each module. In our example:<br />

For the worked example Number of modules in series = 24V ÷ 12V = 2<br />

Therefore the array must comprise of series connected strings of 2 modules.<br />

To determine the number of strings in parallel, the PV array output current required (in A) is divided by the<br />

output of each module (in A).<br />

For the worked example Number of strings in parallel =18.1A ÷ 4.29A = 4.22<br />

Do we round up or down If you want to be conservative you would round up. However in this example we<br />

suggest you round down since this calculation was based on the worst month and we allowed an oversize of<br />

10%.This does need to be determined for each system.<br />

For the worked example The number of modules in the array = 4 x 2 = 8<br />

The peak rating of the array is : 8 x 80W P = 640W P<br />

INVERTER SELECTION<br />

The type of inverter selected for the installation depends on factors such as cost, surge requirements, power<br />

quality and for inverter/chargers, a reduction of the number of system components necessary. Inverters are<br />

available in 3 basic output types - Square wave, modified square wave and sine wave.<br />

There are few square wave inverters used today.<br />

Modified square wave inverters generally have good surge and continuous capability and are usually cheaper<br />

than sine wave types. However, some appliances, such as audio equipment, television and fans can suffer<br />

because of the output wave shape.<br />

Sine wave inverters often provide a better quality power than the 230V (or 110V or 120V) grid supply.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 9


INVERTER SIZING<br />

The selected inverter should be capable of supplying continuous power to all AC loads<br />

AND<br />

providing sufficient surge capability to start any loads that may surge when turned on and particularly if they<br />

turn on at the same time.<br />

Where an inverter cannot meet the above requirements attention needs to be given to load control and<br />

prioritisation strategies.<br />

For the worked example<br />

From the load (energy) assessment on page 3, a selected inverter must be capable of supplying 250VA<br />

continuous with a surge capability of 625VA.<br />

CONTROLLERS- Standard Switched Controller<br />

PV controllers on the market range from simple switched units that only prevent the overcharge (and<br />

discharge) of connected batteries to microprocessor based units that incorporate many additional features<br />

such as …<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

PWM and equalisation charge modes<br />

DC Load control<br />

Voltage and current metering<br />

Amp-hour logging<br />

Generator start/stop control<br />

Unless the controller is a model that is currently limited these should be sized so that they are capable of<br />

carrying 125% of the array short circuit current and withstanding the open circuit voltage of the array. If there is<br />

a possibility that the array could be increased in the future then the controller should be oversized to cater for<br />

the future growth.<br />

(<strong>No</strong>te: sometimes the controller is called a regulator)<br />

For the worked example<br />

The controller chosen must have a current rating<br />

> 1.25 x 4 x 4.8 A = 24A at a system voltage of 24V.<br />

GENERATORS & BATTERY CHARGING<br />

To reduce system costs, it is common for some form of auxiliary charging to be used to provide energy when<br />

daily energy requirements are greater than the daily PV input into the system. This is usually a<br />

diesel/petrol/gas powered generator. Where the electrical output is 230V AC (or 110V or 120V) a battery<br />

charger is required.<br />

An inverter/charger can be used; otherwise a separate charger unit is needed.<br />

Factors that must be considered when using internal combustion generators are<br />

o Fuel storage and spillage precautions<br />

o <strong>No</strong>ise emission control<br />

o Ventilation<br />

o Generator loading<br />

With regards to generator loading, a generator should supply greater than 50% of its maximum rating while<br />

running. Loading of less than 50% increases running and maintenance costs and reduces generator life.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 10


( refer to genset manufacturers' information )<br />

BATTERY CHARGER SIZING<br />

A charger must be capable of supplying voltage greater than the nominal system voltage.<br />

The maximum charging current must not be greater than that recommended by the battery manufacturer but a<br />

usable estimate is a maximum charge current of around 10% of the C 10 rate.<br />

PV ARRAY SIZING- MPPT<br />

DAILY ENERGY REQUIREMENT FROM THE PV ARRAY<br />

The size of the PV array should be selected to take account of:<br />

seasonal variation of solar irradiation<br />

seasonal variation of the daily energy usage<br />

battery efficiency (wh)<br />

Cable losses<br />

MPPT efficiency<br />

manufacturing tolerance of modules<br />

dirt<br />

temperature of array (the effective cell temperature)<br />

With the standard controller the only sub-system losses was the battery efficiency and the calculations are<br />

undertaken using Ah. When using a MPPT the calculations are in Wh and the sub-system losses in the system<br />

include:<br />

• Battery efficiency (watthr)<br />

• Cable losses<br />

• MPPT efficiency<br />

In order to determine the energy required from the PV array, it is necessary to increase the energy from the<br />

battery bank to account for all the sub-system losses.<br />

For the worked example assume cable losses is 3% (transmission efficiency of 97%), MPPT efficiency of 95%<br />

and battery efficiency of 80%<br />

Subsystem efficiency = 0.97 x 0.95 x 0.8 = 0.737<br />

Energy required from the PV array = 1779Wh ÷ 0.737 = 2413Wh<br />

Assume the worst months PSH is 5.<br />

Therefore the required peak PV array output power is:<br />

2413Wh ÷ 5 PSH = 482W P<br />

OVERSIZE FACTOR<br />

If the system does not include a fuel generator which can provide extra charging to the battery bank then the<br />

solar array should be oversized to provide the equalisation charging of the battery bank. In Australia and New<br />

Zealand this is between 30% and 100%. It is recommended in the Pacific that this is 10%.<br />

For the worked example Therefore the adjusted array output current is:<br />

482W P x 1.1 = 530W P<br />

DERATING MODULE PERFORMANCE<br />

The PV array will be de-rated due to:<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 11


• Manufacturer’s Tolerance: Most manufacturers rate their modules ± a percentage (eg ±5%) or wattage<br />

(eg ±2W). Unless every module is tested and its actual rating is known then the modules should be derated<br />

by the manufacturer’s tolerance.<br />

• Dirt: Over a period of time dirt or salt (if located near the coast) can build up on the array and reduce<br />

the output. The output of the module should therefore be derated to reflect this soiling. The actual value<br />

will be dependent on the site but this can vary from 0.9 to 1 (i.e. up to 10% loss due to dirt).<br />

• Temperature: Modules’ output power decreases with temperature above 25°C and increases with<br />

temperatures below 25°C. The average cell temperatu re will be higher than the ambient temperature<br />

because of the glass on the front of the module and the fact that the module absorbs some heat from<br />

the sun. The output power and/or current of the module must be based on the effective temperature of<br />

the cell. This is determined by the following formula:<br />

T cell-eff = T a.day + 25°C<br />

Where<br />

T cell-eff = the average daily effective cell temperature in degrees Celsius (°C)<br />

T a.day = the daytime average ambient temperature for the month that the sizing is being undertaken.<br />

With switched controllers the temperature effect was used to determine the operating current of the<br />

module/array. With MPPT’s the derating power factor must be calculated.<br />

The three main types solar modules available on the market each have different temperature coefficients.<br />

These are:<br />

• Monocrystalline: Modules typically have a temperature coefficient of –0.45%/ o C. That is for every<br />

degree above 25 o C the output power is derated by 0.45%.<br />

• Polycrystalline: Modules typically have a temperature coefficient of –0.5%/ o C.<br />

• Thin Film: Modules have a different temperature characteristic resulting in a lower co-efficient typically<br />

around 0%/°C to -0.25%/°C, but remember to check with the manufacturer<br />

The typical ambient daytime temperature in many parts of the Pacific is between 30 and 35 o C during some<br />

times of the year. So it would not be uncommon to have module cell temperatures of 55 o C or higher.<br />

For the worked example Assume the ambient temperature is 30 o C..<br />

Therefore the effective cell temperature is<br />

30 o C +25 o C = 55 o C<br />

Therefore this is 30 o C above the STC temperature of 25 o C.<br />

The 80 W P module used in this example is a polycrystalline module with a derating of -0.5%/ o C<br />

Therefore the losses due to temperature would be:<br />

Temperature loss = 30 o C x 0.5%/ o C = 15% loss<br />

This is a temperature derating factor of 0.85<br />

Assuming a 5% dirt derating then the adjusted output power of the 80W module is:<br />

Adjusted module power = 80 x 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.85 = 61.4W<br />

NUMBER OF MODULES REQUIRED IN ARRAY<br />

To calculate the required number of modules in the array, divide the required array power by the adjusted<br />

module power.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 12


For the worked example<br />

Number of modules in array =530 ÷ 61.4 = 8.63<br />

(<strong>No</strong>te for the switch regulator we had 4.29 parallel strings of 2 modules in series)<br />

The actual number of modules will be dependent on the MPPT selected. If it was 9 then the rating of the array<br />

is : 9 x 80W P = 720W P<br />

SELECTING MPPT<br />

The following table gives some examples of MPPT’s currently available on the market:<br />

Model d.c. battery<br />

Voltage (V)<br />

STECA<br />

Solarix<br />

MMP2010<br />

Phocos<br />

MMPT<br />

100/20-1<br />

Morningstar<br />

SS-MPPT-15L<br />

Outback Flex<br />

Max 80<br />

Outback Flex<br />

Max60<br />

Table 4: MPPT Data<br />

Input voltage Max d.c. Max(W) Solar<br />

range (V) Battery Array<br />

Current (A)<br />

12/24 17 to 100 20 250/500 10<br />

Max Load<br />

Current (A)<br />

12/24 Max 95 20 300/600 10<br />

12/24 Max 75 15 200/400 15<br />

12/24/36/48/60 Max 150 80 1250(12)<br />

2550(24)<br />

5000(48)<br />

7500 (60)<br />

12/24/36/48/60 Max 150 60 900(12)<br />

1800(24)<br />

3600(48)<br />

4500 (60)<br />

For the worked example<br />

Allowing for 125% oversizing then the required rating of the MPPT is:<br />

1.25 x 720Wp = 900 W<br />

From the table we would select the Outback Flexmax60 which has an array rating of 1800W @ 24V<br />

We could possibly use two of the others e.g. Phocos or Steca.<br />

MATCHING THE PV ARRAY TO THE MAXIMUM VOLTAGE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE MPPT<br />

The MPPT typically have a recommended minimum nominal array voltage and a maximum voltage. In the<br />

case where a maximum input voltage is specified and the array voltage is above the maximum specified, the<br />

MPPT could be damaged.<br />

Some MPPT controllers might allow that the minimum array nominal voltage is that of the battery bank.<br />

However the MPPT will work better when the minimum nominal array voltage is higher than the nominal<br />

voltage of the battery. The Outback range of MPPT’s requires that the minimum nominal array voltage is<br />

greater as shown in Table 5. Please check with the MPPT manufacturer because these could vary.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 13


Table 5 Minimum <strong>No</strong>minal Array Voltages (Outback MPPT’s)<br />

<strong>No</strong>minal Battery Voltage Recommended Minimum <strong>No</strong>minal Array<br />

voltage<br />

12V<br />

24V<br />

24V<br />

36V<br />

48V<br />

60V<br />

It is important that the output voltage of the string is matched to the operating voltages of the MPPT and that<br />

the maximum voltage of the MPPT is never reached.<br />

The output voltage of a module is affected by cell temperature changes in a similar way to the output power.<br />

The manufacturers will provide a voltage temperature coefficient. It is generally specified in V/°C (or mV/°C)<br />

but it can also be expressed as a % .<br />

To ensure that the V oc of the array does not reach the maximum allowable voltage of the MPPT the minimum<br />

day time temperatures for that specific site are required.<br />

In early morning at first light the cell temperature will be very similar to the ambient temperature because the<br />

sun has not had time to heat up the module. In the Pacific Islands the average minimum temperature is 20 0 C<br />

(this could be lower in some mountain areas) and it is recommended that this temperature is used to<br />

determine the maximum V oc. (<strong>No</strong>te: If installing in the mountains then use the appropriate minimum<br />

temperature. Many people also use 0°C, if appropriate for the ar ea). The maximum open circuit voltage is<br />

determined similar to the temperature derating factor for the power.<br />

For the worked example Assume the voltage co-efficient is 0.07V/ o C.<br />

If the minimum temperature is 20 o C this is 5 o C below the STC temperature of 25 o C. Therefore the effective<br />

variation in voltage is:<br />

5 x 0.07 = 0.35V<br />

So the maximum open circuit voltage of the module = 22.1V + 0.35V =22.45V<br />

Maximum number of modules that you can have in series = 150V ÷ 22.45V = 6.68 this is rounded down to 6.<br />

So the MPPT will allow between 3 and 6 modules in a string.<br />

The actual number of modules required was 8.68. If we round down to 8 (since an oversize factor of 10% and<br />

also worst month for PSH was used) then the array would be 2 parallel strings of 4 modules in series. If we<br />

round up to 9 then the solution could be 3 parallel strings with 3 modules in series.<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 14


ATTACHMENT 1: : Table showing Peak Sunhrs for various sites and tilt angles.<br />

Location Peak Sunlight Hours (kWh/m²/day)<br />

Suva, Fiji Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 18°08 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 6.29 6.2 5.54 4.67 4.05 3.72 3.89 4.44 5.08 6.04 6.32 6.38 5.21<br />

Longitude: 178°25 ′ East 18° Tilt ² 6.27 5.88 5.55 4.99 4.61 4.38 4.51 4.88 5.22 5.83 6.1 6.41 5.38<br />

33° Tilt ² 5.95 5.4 5.33 5.03 4.85 4.7 4.8 5 5.1 5.43 5.71 6.12 5.29<br />

Apia, Samoa Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 13°50 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 5.39 5.47 5.16 5.09 4.63 4.46 4.71 5.25 5.77 5.91 5.76 5.51 5.25<br />

Longitude: 171°46 ′ West 13° Tilt ² 5.31 5.24 5.12 5.32 5.07 5 5.24 5.61 5.85 5.72 5.67 5.45 5.38<br />

28° Tilt ² 5.13 4.86 4.93 5.38 5.36 5.42 5.64 5.81 5.75 5.36 5.45 5.3 5.37<br />

Port Vila, Vanuatu Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 17°44 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 6.68 6.2 5.76 4.98 4.2 3.79 4.04 4.75 5.65 6.47 6.67 6.93 5.5<br />

Longitude: 168°19 ′ East 17° Tilt ² 6.69 5.9 5.78 5.33 4.76 4.42 4.66 5.22 5.82 6.26 6.46 7.01 5.69<br />

32° Tilt ² 6.38 5.43 5.56 5.39 5.02 4.75 4.98 5.39 5.72 5.83 6.07 6.73 5.61<br />

Tarawa, Kiribati Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 01°28 ′ <strong>No</strong>rth 0° Tilt ¹ 5.58 5.98 5.99 5.87 5.82 5.7 5.87 6.15 6.52 6.4 6.1 5.5 5.95<br />

Longitude: 173°02 ′ East 16° Tilt ² 5.9 6.11 5.83 5.79 5.94 5.92 6.06 6.17 6.28 6.45 6.43 5.88 6.06<br />

Rarotonga, Cook Islands Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 21°12 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 6.45 6.14 5.78 4.59 3.86 3.54 3.73 4.46 5.16 5.94 6.63 6.56 5.23<br />

Longitude: 159°47 ′ West 21° Tilt ² 5.9 5.82 5.86 5.04 4.56 4.2 4.35 5.07 5.39 5.74 6.11 6.51 5.38<br />

36° Tilt ² 5.19 5.34 5.62 5.08 4.8 4.49 4.6 5.22 5.27 5.35 5.41 6.11 5.21<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 15


Nuku'alofa, Tongatapu, Tonga Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 21°08 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 6.69 6.3 5.62 4.65 4.04 3.58 3.78 4.43 5.23 6.28 6.69 6.7 5.32<br />

Longitude: 175°12 ′ West 21° Tilt ² 6.1 5.97 5.69 5.1 4.81 4.25 4.41 5.03 5.46 6.08 6.16 6.65 5.48<br />

36° Tilt ² 5.35 5.47 5.46 5.14 5.08 4.55 4.68 5.18 5.34 5.65 5.45 6.25 5.3<br />

Honiara, Solomon Islands Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 09°27 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 5.99 5.55 5.61 5.41 4.76 4.59 4.45 5.19 5.81 6.26 6.4 6.22 5.52<br />

Longitude: 159°57 ′ East 9° Tilt ² 5.98 5.47 5.54 5.52 5.01 4.91 4.7 5.36 5.82 6.15 6.38 6.24 5.59<br />

24° Tilt ² 5.91 5.29 5.35 5.59 5.27 5.28 4.99 5.53 5.72 5.88 6.28 6.22 5.61<br />

Koror, Palau Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 07°20 ′ <strong>No</strong>rth 0° Tilt ¹ 5.19 5.59 6.18 6.3 5.71 5.01 5.12 5.2 5.56 5.39 5.26 4.94 5.45<br />

Longitude: 134°28 ′ East 7° Tilt ² 5.4 5.7 6.16 6.22 5.7 5.01 5.11 5.15 5.49 5.45 5.44 5.16 5.5<br />

22° Tilt ² 5.75 5.86 6.06 6.01 5.66 5.03 5.1 5.03 5.3 5.51 5.74 5.54 5.55<br />

Ponape, Pohnpei FSM Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 6°54 ′ <strong>No</strong>rth 0° Tilt ¹ 4.97 5.57 5.91 5.79 5.44 5.33 5.51 5.54 5.66 5.29 5.03 4.83 5.4<br />

Longitude: 158°13 ′ East 6° Tilt ² 5.12 5.65 5.88 5.72 5.42 5.33 5.51 5.49 5.59 5.33 5.16 5 5.43<br />

21° Tilt ² 5.43 5.82 5.8 5.55 5.4 5.39 5.53 5.39 5.41 5.39 5.43 5.36 5.49<br />

Majuro, Marshall Islands Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 7°12 ′ <strong>No</strong>rth 0° Tilt ¹ 5.26 5.86 6.11 5.89 5.66 5.31 5.35 5.63 5.42 5.15 4.88 4.84 5.44<br />

Longitude: 171°06 ′ East 7° Tilt ² 5.47 5.99 6.09 5.81 5.65 5.32 5.35 5.58 5.35 5.2 5.03 5.05 5.49<br />

22° Tilt ² 5.83 6.16 5.99 5.62 5.61 5.35 5.35 5.46 5.16 5.25 5.27 5.4 5.53<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 16


Alofi, Niue Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 19°04 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 6.47 6.2 5.67 4.8 4.26 3.86 4.01 4.61 5.35 6.02 6.53 6.46 5.34<br />

Longitude: 169°55 ′ West 19° Tilt ² 6.43 5.88 5.7 5.2 4.96 4.47 4.75 5.14 5.53 5.81 5.98 6.47 5.53<br />

34° Tilt ² 6.06 5.4 5.47 5.24 5.24 4.78 5.08 5.29 5.42 5.41 5.35 6.15 5.41<br />

Nauru Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 0°32 ′ South 0°Tilt ¹ 5.77 6.24 6.27 6.04 5.99 5.75 5.85 6.25 6.7 6.5 6.12 5.5 6.07<br />

Longitude: 166°56 ′ East 15° Tilt ² 5.94 6.26 6.07 6.06 6.28 6.16 6.21 6.4 6.52 6.45 6.27 5.69 6.19<br />

Vaiaku, Tuvalu Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 8°31 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 5.16 5.27 5.33 5.29 4.93 4.66 4.76 5.3 5.72 5.8 5.57 5.23 5.25<br />

Longitude: 179°13 ′ East 8° Tilt ² 5.14 5.2 5.26 5.37 5.14 4.92 5 5.45 5.71 5.71 5.54 5.22 5.31<br />

23° Tilt ² 5.09 5.05 5.08 5.43 5.42 5.3 5.33 5.62 5.61 5.49 5.47 5.21 5.34<br />

Hagåtña, Guam Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 13°28 ′ <strong>No</strong>rth 0° Tilt ¹ 5.33 5.87 6.73 7.12 7.04 6.44 6 5.3 5.42 5.46 5.16 5.05 5.9<br />

Longitude: 144°45 ′ East 13° Tilt ² 5.95 6.27 6.86 6.88 6.97 6.43 5.95 5.06 5.38 5.7 5.66 5.7 6.07<br />

28° Tilt ² 6.41 6.49 6.75 6.4 6.7 6.27 5.76 4.68 5.19 5.78 6.01 6.2 6.05<br />

<strong>No</strong>umea, New Caledonia Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 22°16 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 7.31 6.7 5.73 4.97 3.94 3.47 3.91 4.73 6.05 7.09 7.41 7.6 5.73<br />

Longitude: 166°27 ′ East 22° Tilt ² 6.61 6.34 5.83 5.56 4.76 4.19 4.69 5.51 6.44 6.88 6.77 7.53 5.93<br />

37° Tilt ² 5.75 5.8 5.6 5.63 5.03 4.48 5 5.7 6.33 6.38 5.94 7.03 5.72<br />

Pago Pago, American Samoa Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct <strong>No</strong>v Dec<br />

Annual<br />

Average<br />

Latitude: 14°16 ′ South 0° Tilt ¹ 5.87 5.93 5.54 5.18 4.63 4.4 4.59 5.2 5.78 6.05 6.11 5.93 5.43<br />

Longitude: 170°42 ′ West 14° Tilt ² 5.79 5.66 5.51 5.43 5.11 4.99 5.15 5.59 5.88 5.84 6.01 5.87 5.57<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 17


29° Tilt ² 5.57 5.22 5.3 5.49 5.4 5.39 5.52 5.77 5.77 5.46 5.75 5.68 5.53<br />

¹ Monthly Averaged Insolation Incident On A Horizontal Surface (kWh/m²/day)<br />

² Monthly Averaged Irradiation Incident On An Equator-Pointed Tilted Surface (kWh/m²/day)<br />

Source: NASA Surface meteorology and Solar Energy<br />

(http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov)<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 18


Appendix 1 – Table of Abbreviations and Acronyms<br />

d.c.<br />

Direct current<br />

a.c.<br />

Alternating current<br />

AS/NZS Australia Standard/New Zealand Standard<br />

UL<br />

Underwriters Laboratory<br />

ICC<br />

International Code Council<br />

NFPA National fire Protection Association<br />

ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers<br />

IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers<br />

Wh<br />

Watt hours<br />

kWh Kilowatt hours<br />

W<br />

Watts<br />

W P<br />

Watts peak<br />

H<br />

hours<br />

V<br />

Volts<br />

A<br />

Amps<br />

VA<br />

Volt amps<br />

Ah<br />

Amp hours<br />

DOD Depth of discharge<br />

C 100 Battery capacity when battery is discharged over 100<br />

hours<br />

PV<br />

Photovoltaic<br />

MPPT Maximum power point tracker<br />

PSH Peak sun hours( kWh/m 2 )<br />

kWh/m 2 Kilowatt hours/metres squared<br />

°C Degrees Celsius<br />

NOCT <strong>No</strong>minal operating cell temperature<br />

T cell-eff the average daily effective cell temperature (degrees<br />

Celsius)<br />

T a.day the daytime average ambient temperature for the month<br />

that the sizing is being undertaken (degrees Celsius)<br />

f man Derating due to manufacturers tolerance<br />

(dimensionless)<br />

f dirt<br />

Derating due to dirt (dimensionless)<br />

PWM Pulse Width Modulation<br />

V oc<br />

Open circuit voltage (volts)<br />

V mp<br />

Maximum power point voltage (volts)<br />

I sc<br />

Short circuit current (amps)<br />

I mp<br />

Maximum power point current (amps)<br />

STC Standard test conditions<br />

Issue 1 September 2012 Page 19


III. (Attachment) Letter of derogation # DEVCO/H3/BD/D (2011)<br />

Letter of derogation #<br />

DEVCO/H3/BD/D (2011)


The updated tender dossier is available from the following Internet address:<br />

https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/online-services/index.cfmdo=publi.welcome<br />

The tender dossier is also available from the Contracting Authority at the following internet addresses:<br />

https://sites.google.com/site/ef2yspsc/tender-dossier or http://www.yapstategov.org/bids.htm<br />

--- End of Document –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!