Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

11.11.2012 Views

ask the reader's indulgence in this regard. Thruout, ‘P...’ represents paragraph numbers in Plumley's Grammar, ‘C...’ are page numbers in Crum's Dictionary (Biblio.4+5). In place of the Greek form, Jesus (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ), I have used the original Aramaic: Yeshua ((w#y), meaning ‘Yahweh Savior’, i.e. ‘He-Is Savior’ (Ph 20a). Hyphenated ‘I-Am’ represents the divine self-naming from Ex 3:14: Hebrew hyh) (ahyh), Greek ΕΓΩ ΕΙΜΙ, Coptic anok pe (Th 13; P306). Lastly, I have appended five essays as commentary: (1) ‘Are the Coptic Gospels Gnostic?’, a formal demonstration that they cannot be so categorized; (2) ‘The Maternal Spirit’, on the gender in the Semitic languages of #dqh xwr [rúakh ha-qódesh, Spirit the-Holy]; (3) ‘Theogenesis’, on the intimation in Philip that the original human transgression consisted in claiming to produce children, rather than accepting them as begotten by God alone; (4) ‘Angel, Image and Symbol’, regarding these three primary concepts as found in the new scriptures, together with their underlying metaphysical framework of an apparent Spiritual Idealism; and (5) ‘The Paul Paradox’, a philosophical analysis of the evident discrepancies between the Gospels and the theology of Saul of Tarsus, together with a survey of similar critiques by many pre-eminent individuals across the centuries. In searching out the sense of these new writings, I have had the benefit of extended conversations across the years with many friends and colleagues, especially Robert Schapiro, Christina Wesson, Crosby Brown, Luz García and Pedro Chamizo. My long-term thanks are also due to two of my undergraduate instructors: the poet Robert Frost, for his advice to partake only in what is worthy of one's time; and Prof William E. Kennick, for his example of the highest standards in philosophical theology. To Bertrand Russell, while I was studying in London and had the opportunity to demonstrate with him in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, I am indebted for his fearless example in confronting the 8

Establishment— whether political, military or religious— for the sake of the truth. Much of the present edition was prepared while I was a guest of numerous universities both state and private, as well as seminaries and religious communities both Catholic and Protestant, thruout Latin America; and also of the faculties of philosophy, of orthodox theology and of informatics at the University of Athens— for their fraternal hospitality I am profoundly grateful. Internet technical advice has been kindly provided by Ioannis Georgiadis of the Athens University Computer Center. The canonical Gospels must be the paradigm in assessing any newly- discovered ‘Gospel’. That is to say, our criteria for evaluating such a text must be both its internal consistency with, and its external provenance relative to, the four texts which provide the ostensive definition 1 of the very term ‘Gospel’ to begin with. So: are Thomas, Philip and Valentine theologically harmonious with the Synoptics and John? Do they all come from the same general historic context and archeological ambiance in antiquity? Are the new texts, upon analysis, both conceptually and empirically coherent with the four canonical Gospels? Do they, all in all, seem to be of the same Logos? Sufficiently careful scrutiny, I have concluded, yields an affirmative answer to all of these questions. Thus the intent of this present edition, together with the online Coptic texts, dictionary and grammar, is to provide the reader with the resources to carry out a thorough assessment of these extraordinary scriptures for him/herself. It has often been suggested that these new writings are basically concoctions produced by a series of unknown somebodies long after the events they purport to concern. However, the simplest explanation here (by William of Ockham's famous Principle of Economy: ‘Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily’) is not lengthy oral tradition followed by numerous written redactions; the simplest explanation is that these three scriptures were composed by the Apostle Thomas, Philip the Evangelist 1 ‘Ostensive definition’: defining a term by indicating an exemplary or paradigmatic referent. 9

ask the reader's indulgence in this regard. Thruout, ‘P...’ represents<br />

paragraph numbers in Plumley's Grammar, ‘C...’ are page numbers in<br />

Crum's Dictionary (Biblio.4+5).<br />

In place <strong>of</strong> the Greek form, Jesus (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ), I have used the original<br />

Aramaic: Yeshua ((w#y), meaning ‘Yahweh Savior’, i.e. ‘He-Is Savior’ (Ph<br />

20a). Hyphenated ‘I-Am’ represents the divine self-naming from Ex 3:14:<br />

Hebrew hyh) (ahyh), Greek ΕΓΩ ΕΙΜΙ, Coptic anok pe (Th 13; P306).<br />

Lastly, I have appended five essays as commentary: (1) ‘Are the<br />

Coptic <strong>Gospels</strong> Gnostic?’, a formal demonstration that they cannot be so<br />

categorized; (2) ‘The Maternal Spirit’, on the gender in the Semitic<br />

languages <strong>of</strong> #dqh xwr [rúakh ha-qódesh, Spirit the-Holy];<br />

(3) ‘Theogenesis’, on the intimation in <strong>Philip</strong> that the original human<br />

transgression consisted in claiming to produce children, rather than<br />

accepting them as begotten by God alone; (4) ‘Angel, Image <strong>and</strong> Symbol’,<br />

regarding these three primary concepts as found in the new scriptures,<br />

together with their underlying metaphysical framework <strong>of</strong> an apparent<br />

Spiritual Idealism; <strong>and</strong> (5) ‘The Paul Paradox’, a philosophical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the evident discrepancies between the <strong>Gospels</strong> <strong>and</strong> the theology <strong>of</strong> Saul<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tarsus, together with a survey <strong>of</strong> similar critiques by many pre-eminent<br />

individuals across the centuries.<br />

In searching out the sense <strong>of</strong> these new writings, I have had the<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> extended conversations across the years with many friends <strong>and</strong><br />

colleagues, especially Robert Schapiro, Christina Wesson, Crosby Brown,<br />

Luz García <strong>and</strong> Pedro Chamizo. My long-term thanks are also due to two<br />

<strong>of</strong> my undergraduate instructors: the poet Robert Frost, for his advice<br />

to partake only in what is worthy <strong>of</strong> one's time; <strong>and</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong> William E.<br />

Kennick, for his example <strong>of</strong> the highest st<strong>and</strong>ards in philosophical<br />

theology. To Bertr<strong>and</strong> Russell, while I was studying in London <strong>and</strong> had the<br />

opportunity to demonstrate with him in the Campaign for Nuclear<br />

Disarmament, I am indebted for his fearless example in confronting the<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!