Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church
Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church
ask the reader's indulgence in this regard. Thruout, ‘P...’ represents paragraph numbers in Plumley's Grammar, ‘C...’ are page numbers in Crum's Dictionary (Biblio.4+5). In place of the Greek form, Jesus (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ), I have used the original Aramaic: Yeshua ((w#y), meaning ‘Yahweh Savior’, i.e. ‘He-Is Savior’ (Ph 20a). Hyphenated ‘I-Am’ represents the divine self-naming from Ex 3:14: Hebrew hyh) (ahyh), Greek ΕΓΩ ΕΙΜΙ, Coptic anok pe (Th 13; P306). Lastly, I have appended five essays as commentary: (1) ‘Are the Coptic Gospels Gnostic?’, a formal demonstration that they cannot be so categorized; (2) ‘The Maternal Spirit’, on the gender in the Semitic languages of #dqh xwr [rúakh ha-qódesh, Spirit the-Holy]; (3) ‘Theogenesis’, on the intimation in Philip that the original human transgression consisted in claiming to produce children, rather than accepting them as begotten by God alone; (4) ‘Angel, Image and Symbol’, regarding these three primary concepts as found in the new scriptures, together with their underlying metaphysical framework of an apparent Spiritual Idealism; and (5) ‘The Paul Paradox’, a philosophical analysis of the evident discrepancies between the Gospels and the theology of Saul of Tarsus, together with a survey of similar critiques by many pre-eminent individuals across the centuries. In searching out the sense of these new writings, I have had the benefit of extended conversations across the years with many friends and colleagues, especially Robert Schapiro, Christina Wesson, Crosby Brown, Luz García and Pedro Chamizo. My long-term thanks are also due to two of my undergraduate instructors: the poet Robert Frost, for his advice to partake only in what is worthy of one's time; and Prof William E. Kennick, for his example of the highest standards in philosophical theology. To Bertrand Russell, while I was studying in London and had the opportunity to demonstrate with him in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, I am indebted for his fearless example in confronting the 8
Establishment— whether political, military or religious— for the sake of the truth. Much of the present edition was prepared while I was a guest of numerous universities both state and private, as well as seminaries and religious communities both Catholic and Protestant, thruout Latin America; and also of the faculties of philosophy, of orthodox theology and of informatics at the University of Athens— for their fraternal hospitality I am profoundly grateful. Internet technical advice has been kindly provided by Ioannis Georgiadis of the Athens University Computer Center. The canonical Gospels must be the paradigm in assessing any newly- discovered ‘Gospel’. That is to say, our criteria for evaluating such a text must be both its internal consistency with, and its external provenance relative to, the four texts which provide the ostensive definition 1 of the very term ‘Gospel’ to begin with. So: are Thomas, Philip and Valentine theologically harmonious with the Synoptics and John? Do they all come from the same general historic context and archeological ambiance in antiquity? Are the new texts, upon analysis, both conceptually and empirically coherent with the four canonical Gospels? Do they, all in all, seem to be of the same Logos? Sufficiently careful scrutiny, I have concluded, yields an affirmative answer to all of these questions. Thus the intent of this present edition, together with the online Coptic texts, dictionary and grammar, is to provide the reader with the resources to carry out a thorough assessment of these extraordinary scriptures for him/herself. It has often been suggested that these new writings are basically concoctions produced by a series of unknown somebodies long after the events they purport to concern. However, the simplest explanation here (by William of Ockham's famous Principle of Economy: ‘Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily’) is not lengthy oral tradition followed by numerous written redactions; the simplest explanation is that these three scriptures were composed by the Apostle Thomas, Philip the Evangelist 1 ‘Ostensive definition’: defining a term by indicating an exemplary or paradigmatic referent. 9
- Page 1 and 2: Metalogos’ The Gospels of Thomas
- Page 3 and 4: Introduction In December of 1945 tw
- Page 5 and 6: www.metalog.org/files/supremacy.htm
- Page 7: as the original Gospel Messianics w
- Page 11 and 12: Somsel); also in MSWord print versi
- Page 13 and 14: www.metalog.org. 20. ‘The History
- Page 15 and 16: (www.metalog.org/files/tpb/sabbath.
- Page 17 and 18: the words of Jesus contained in our
- Page 19 and 20: contains ... four parables which ar
- Page 21 and 22: the year 140 AD, and could date fro
- Page 23 and 24: These are the secret sayings° whic
- Page 25 and 26: together?’; ³the Qur’án 27:75
- Page 27 and 28: sick among them. For what goes into
- Page 29 and 30: act feminine, when you establish [a
- Page 31 and 32: 33. Yeshua says: What thou shall he
- Page 33 and 34: 45. Yeshua says: They do not harves
- Page 35 and 36: 55. Yeshua says: Whoever does not h
- Page 37 and 38: invites thee. He replied to him: My
- Page 39 and 40: 77. Yeshua says: I-Am the Light who
- Page 41 and 42: 89. Yeshua says: Why do you wash th
- Page 43 and 44: nor does he allow the oxen to eat.
- Page 45 and 46: evolving after the invasion of Alex
- Page 47 and 48: Image/Imagery (22 50 83 84): Gk Ε
- Page 49 and 50: Sabbath (27): Heb tb# (shabat: repo
- Page 51 and 52: Yeshua (Prologue et passim): Aram (
- Page 53 and 54: you.’) 9. The light with the dark
- Page 55 and 56: it had no wheat as food for humanki
- Page 57 and 58: Logos; and his blood is the Sacred
ask the reader's indulgence in this regard. Thruout, ‘P...’ represents<br />
paragraph numbers in Plumley's Grammar, ‘C...’ are page numbers in<br />
Crum's Dictionary (Biblio.4+5).<br />
In place <strong>of</strong> the Greek form, Jesus (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ), I have used the original<br />
Aramaic: Yeshua ((w#y), meaning ‘Yahweh Savior’, i.e. ‘He-Is Savior’ (Ph<br />
20a). Hyphenated ‘I-Am’ represents the divine self-naming from Ex 3:14:<br />
Hebrew hyh) (ahyh), Greek ΕΓΩ ΕΙΜΙ, Coptic anok pe (Th 13; P306).<br />
Lastly, I have appended five essays as commentary: (1) ‘Are the<br />
Coptic <strong>Gospels</strong> Gnostic?’, a formal demonstration that they cannot be so<br />
categorized; (2) ‘The Maternal Spirit’, on the gender in the Semitic<br />
languages <strong>of</strong> #dqh xwr [rúakh ha-qódesh, Spirit the-Holy];<br />
(3) ‘Theogenesis’, on the intimation in <strong>Philip</strong> that the original human<br />
transgression consisted in claiming to produce children, rather than<br />
accepting them as begotten by God alone; (4) ‘Angel, Image <strong>and</strong> Symbol’,<br />
regarding these three primary concepts as found in the new scriptures,<br />
together with their underlying metaphysical framework <strong>of</strong> an apparent<br />
Spiritual Idealism; <strong>and</strong> (5) ‘The Paul Paradox’, a philosophical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the evident discrepancies between the <strong>Gospels</strong> <strong>and</strong> the theology <strong>of</strong> Saul<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tarsus, together with a survey <strong>of</strong> similar critiques by many pre-eminent<br />
individuals across the centuries.<br />
In searching out the sense <strong>of</strong> these new writings, I have had the<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> extended conversations across the years with many friends <strong>and</strong><br />
colleagues, especially Robert Schapiro, Christina Wesson, Crosby Brown,<br />
Luz García <strong>and</strong> Pedro Chamizo. My long-term thanks are also due to two<br />
<strong>of</strong> my undergraduate instructors: the poet Robert Frost, for his advice<br />
to partake only in what is worthy <strong>of</strong> one's time; <strong>and</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong> William E.<br />
Kennick, for his example <strong>of</strong> the highest st<strong>and</strong>ards in philosophical<br />
theology. To Bertr<strong>and</strong> Russell, while I was studying in London <strong>and</strong> had the<br />
opportunity to demonstrate with him in the Campaign for Nuclear<br />
Disarmament, I am indebted for his fearless example in confronting the<br />
8