Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

11.11.2012 Views

Barnabas, the Shepherd of Hermas, the Gospel of the Egyptians, the Gospel of the Hebrews (in which Christ calls the Sacred Spirit his Mother), the Traditions of Matthias, the Apocalypse of Peter, the Didakhê, and the Acts of Paul. Thus the Codex Sinaiticus of the mid-4th century includes both Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas, while the Codex Alexandrinus of the early 5th century contains I and II Clement as well as the Psalms of Solomon. There was no church council regarding the NT canon until the Synod of Laodicea (363 AD), which indeed rejected John's Apocalypse or Book of Revelation. Twelve centuries later (!), the Western Canon was finally settled by the Council of Trent (1546 AD), which designated the present 27-book listing as an article of Roman Catholic faith (although episcopal councils have never claimed to be infallible; the vote at Trent was 24 to 15, with 16 abstentions)— and which the various Protestant Churches subsequently accepted. The sundry Eastern Churches have equally complex records on establishing their respective NT canons: thus, the Armenian canon includes a Pauline III Corinthians; the Coptic NT contains I+II Clement; the Syrian/ Nestorian Peshitta excludes II+III John, Jude, and Rev/Ap; the Ethiopian Bible adds books called the Sínodos, the Epistle of Peter to Clement, the Book of the Covenant, and the Didascalia; and John's Rev/Ap is still not included in the Greek Orthodox Bible! (see Biblio.35) Notably, however, the Gospels of Thomas, Philip and Truth were evidently not known to any of those traditions at the time of their attempts at establishing a NT canon, never being so much as mentioned in their protracted deliberations— and hence were never even under consideration for inclusion in their respective listings. In any case, the concept of a canon was certainly never intended to exclude the possible inspiration of any subsequent textual discoveries or isolated agrapha (Lk 1:1, Jn 21:25). Precisely what transpired during the first 3½ centuries AD, prior to the earliest ecclesiastical attempts at forming a canon, is notoriously obscure, 6

as the original Gospel Messianics were eventually supplanted by the Pauline ‘Christians’ (Ac 11:2526). Thus the Epistle of Barnabas (late first century) remains unacquainted with the historical Gospels, whereas Justin Martyr (mid-second century) shows no awareness of Paul's writings— indicating an ongoing schism between the Petrine and the Pauline traditions. Clement of Alexandria and Irenaeus of Lyon, at the end of the second century, are the first authors explicitly to quote from both the Gospels and from Paul. I have attempted to analyze the basis of this rift in ‘The Paul Paradox’, Comm.5, below. Essential reading on that formative period is Walter Bauer's pioneering study, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity (1934; http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/humm/Resources/Bauer). The translations of the texts themselves are both as literal and as lyrical as I could make them. Any grammatical irregularities encountered (e.g. the verb tenses in Th 109) are in the Coptic text itself. Plausible textual reconstructions are in [brackets], while editorial additions are in (parentheses). ‘[...]’ indicates places where it is not possible to interpolate the deterioration of the papyrus manuscript. The Greek Oxyrhynchus variants to Thomas are within {braces}. ‘You’ and its cognates are plural, ‘thou’ and its cognates represent the singular (but generally with the modern verb-form). Notes at the end of each logion are indicated by superscript¹, those at the end of the current text with a circle°. The scriptural cross-references listed are essential to an understanding of the saying in its biblical context, and the reader is urged to refer to them in every case; explicit parallels to Thomas in the Synoptics are separately marked with an equal sign=, to spare the reader looking up what is already well-known. In antiquity, of course, there were no lower-case letters, and thus in order to represent the Hebrew, Greek and Coptic scripts I have not here used their subsequent cursive letters but rather their classic forms, which are easier for the non-scholar to read. In turn, in translating such ancient texts to modern languages, it is virtually impossible to capitalize in a consistent and adequate manner; I 7

Barnabas, the Shepherd <strong>of</strong> Hermas, the Gospel <strong>of</strong> the Egyptians, the<br />

Gospel <strong>of</strong> the Hebrews (in which Christ calls the Sacred Spirit his Mother),<br />

the Traditions <strong>of</strong> Matthias, the Apocalypse <strong>of</strong> Peter, the Didakhê, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Acts <strong>of</strong> Paul. Thus the Codex Sinaiticus <strong>of</strong> the mid-4th century includes<br />

both Barnabas <strong>and</strong> the Shepherd <strong>of</strong> Hermas, while the Codex<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>rinus <strong>of</strong> the early 5th century contains I <strong>and</strong> II Clement as well as<br />

the Psalms <strong>of</strong> Solomon. There was no church council regarding the NT<br />

canon until the Synod <strong>of</strong> Laodicea (363 AD), which indeed rejected John's<br />

Apocalypse or Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation. Twelve centuries later (!), the Western<br />

Canon was finally settled by the Council <strong>of</strong> Trent (1546 AD), which<br />

designated the present 27-book listing as an article <strong>of</strong> Roman Catholic<br />

faith (although episcopal councils have never claimed to be infallible; the<br />

vote at Trent was 24 to 15, with 16 abstentions)— <strong>and</strong> which the various<br />

Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es subsequently accepted. The sundry Eastern<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es have equally complex records on establishing their respective<br />

NT canons: thus, the Armenian canon includes a Pauline III Corinthians;<br />

the Coptic NT contains I+II Clement; the Syrian/ Nestorian Peshitta<br />

excludes II+III John, Jude, <strong>and</strong> Rev/Ap; the Ethiopian Bible adds books<br />

called the Sínodos, the Epistle <strong>of</strong> Peter to Clement, the Book <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Covenant, <strong>and</strong> the Didascalia; <strong>and</strong> John's Rev/Ap is still not included in<br />

the Greek Orthodox Bible! (see Biblio.35)<br />

Notably, however, the <strong>Gospels</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Thomas</strong>, <strong>Philip</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Truth</strong> were<br />

evidently not known to any <strong>of</strong> those traditions at the time <strong>of</strong> their<br />

attempts at establishing a NT canon, never being so much as mentioned<br />

in their protracted deliberations— <strong>and</strong> hence were never even under<br />

consideration for inclusion in their respective listings. In any case, the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> a canon was certainly never intended to exclude the possible<br />

inspiration <strong>of</strong> any subsequent textual discoveries or isolated agrapha (Lk<br />

1:1, Jn 21:25).<br />

Precisely what transpired during the first 3½ centuries AD, prior to the<br />

earliest ecclesiastical attempts at forming a canon, is notoriously obscure,<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!