Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church Gospels of Thomas and Philip and Truth - Syriac Christian Church

11.11.2012 Views

Pauline Church— which indeed has also disseminated worldwide the very OT which Paul himself had disparaged. On the other hand, the Petrine/Apostolic Church (which one could only join by a complete personal renunciation; see #16 above) seems not to have survived the persecutions of the first centuries. Paul was personally in charge of the stoning of Stephen (Ac 7:58-8:1), since according to Dt 17:7 the ‘witnesses who laid their cloaks at his feet’— i.e. were under his direct authority— were obliged to cast the first stones. Was he also ‘the captain of the Temple guard’ who arrested Kefa and John in Ac 4:1? Might one even ask as to his involvement the night Christ himself was arrested? (Remember that Lk 22:6365 takes place at the hands of the Temple guard, not those of the Romans.) Thus perhaps the puzzling II-Cor 5:16, ΕΓΝΩΚΑΜΕΝ ΚΑΤΑ ΣΑΡΚΑ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΝ: ‘We have known Christ according to the flesh.’ This would certainly explain Paul's subsequent obsession with unmerited forgiveness! In any event, my purpose here has been merely to format a set of scriptural dichotomies which exhibit the underlying logic of the ancient Messianic/Paulianity schism, as essentially a conceptual (and of course pragmatic!) rather than a factual issue. This in turn may hopefully serve to stimulate in the reader a reconsideration of the apostolic status of Saul of Tarsus. For he evidently never joined Christ's Discipleship at all— which would indisputably have meant accepting Peter's spiritual authority— much less became an Apostle. These basic questions can no longer be papered over, nor can they be settled by institutional fiat. For their illuminating implication is that traditional Christianity— as defined by the classical NT canon including both the Gospels and Marcion’s collection of Paul's Epistles— is logically self-contradictory and hence inherently unstable. Or, in a contemporary analogy, we might say that Paul's writings are like a computer virus: a surreptitious theological reprogram which, downloaded with the Gospels, changes their basic message, rendering it not gibberish but rather transmuted into another doctrine altogether— historical Church Christianity instead of the original Messianic Brother/Sisterhood. Appendix: Quotations regarding Paul (in chronological order; suggestions: edit@metalog.org) 134

St Augustine of Hippo, Letter XXVIII, to Jerome (394 AD); Letter XL, to Jerome (397): I have been reading also some writings ascribed to you, on the Epistles of the Apostle Paul. In reading your exposition of the Epistle to the Galatians,... most disastrous consequences must follow upon our believing that anything false is found in the sacred books: that is to say, that the men by whom the Scripture has been given to us and committed to writing, did put down in these books anything false.... For if you once admit into such a high sanctuary of authority one false statement as made in the way of duty, there will not be left a single sentence of those books which, if appearing to any one difficult in practice or hard to believe, may not by the same fatal rule be explained away, as a statement in which intentionally and under a sense of duty, the author declared what was not true.... If indeed Peter seemed to him to be doing what was right, and if notwithstanding, he, in order to soothe troublesome opponents, both said and wrote that Peter did what was wrong— if we say thus,... nowhere in the sacred books shall the authority of pure truth stand sure. || If it be possible for men to say and believe that, after introducing his narrative with these words, ‘The things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not’, the apostle lied when he said of Peter and Barnabas, ‘I saw that they walked not uprightly, according to the truth of the gospel’,... [then] if they did walk uprightly, Paul wrote what was false; and if he wrote what was false here, when did he say what was true? Anselm of Laon (†1117), Gloss on I-Corinthians 15: ‘He was seen by Cephas’; prior to the other males, to whom, as we read in the Gospel, he appeared. Otherwise this would be contrary to the statement that he appeared first to the women. Peter Abelard, Sic et Non (1120); Letters of Direction (before 1142): Writing in reply to St Augustine, after he had been brought to task by Augustine concerning the exposition of a certain spot in Paul's Epistle to the Galatians, Jerome said (Epist112.4), ‘You ask why I have said in my commentary on Paul's letter to the Galatians that Paul could not have rebuked Peter for what he himself had also done. And you asserted that the reproof of the Apostle was not merely feigned, but true guidance, and that I ought not to teach a falsehood. I respond that ... I followed the commentary of Origen.’ || We know of course that when writing to the Thessalonians the Apostle [Paul] sharply rebuked certain idle busybodies by saying that ‘A man who will not work shall not eat.’... But was not Mary sitting idle in order to listen to the words of Christ, while Martha was ... grumbling rather enviously about her sister's 135

Pauline <strong>Church</strong>— which indeed has also disseminated worldwide the very OT which<br />

Paul himself had disparaged. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the Petrine/Apostolic <strong>Church</strong><br />

(which one could only join by a complete personal renunciation; see #16 above)<br />

seems not to have survived the persecutions <strong>of</strong> the first centuries.<br />

Paul was personally in charge <strong>of</strong> the stoning <strong>of</strong> Stephen (Ac 7:58-8:1), since<br />

according to Dt 17:7 the ‘witnesses who laid their cloaks at his feet’— i.e. were<br />

under his direct authority— were obliged to cast the first stones. Was he also ‘the<br />

captain <strong>of</strong> the Temple guard’ who arrested Kefa <strong>and</strong> John in Ac 4:1? Might one even<br />

ask as to his involvement the night Christ himself was arrested? (Remember that Lk<br />

22:6365 takes place at the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Temple guard, not those <strong>of</strong> the Romans.)<br />

Thus perhaps the puzzling II-Cor 5:16, ΕΓΝΩΚΑΜΕΝ ΚΑΤΑ ΣΑΡΚΑ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΝ: ‘We<br />

have known Christ according to the flesh.’ This would certainly explain Paul's<br />

subsequent obsession with unmerited forgiveness!<br />

In any event, my purpose here has been merely to format a set <strong>of</strong> scriptural<br />

dichotomies which exhibit the underlying logic <strong>of</strong> the ancient Messianic/Paulianity<br />

schism, as essentially a conceptual (<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> course pragmatic!) rather than a factual<br />

issue. This in turn may hopefully serve to stimulate in the reader a reconsideration <strong>of</strong><br />

the apostolic status <strong>of</strong> Saul <strong>of</strong> Tarsus. For he evidently never joined Christ's<br />

Discipleship at all— which would indisputably have meant accepting Peter's spiritual<br />

authority— much less became an Apostle.<br />

These basic questions can no longer be papered over, nor can they be settled<br />

by institutional fiat. For their illuminating implication is that traditional <strong>Christian</strong>ity—<br />

as defined by the classical NT canon including both the <strong>Gospels</strong> <strong>and</strong> Marcion’s<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> Paul's Epistles— is logically self-contradictory <strong>and</strong> hence inherently<br />

unstable. Or, in a contemporary analogy, we might say that Paul's writings are like a<br />

computer virus: a surreptitious theological reprogram which, downloaded with the<br />

<strong>Gospels</strong>, changes their basic message, rendering it not gibberish but rather<br />

transmuted into another doctrine altogether— historical <strong>Church</strong> <strong>Christian</strong>ity instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> the original Messianic Brother/Sisterhood.<br />

Appendix: Quotations regarding Paul<br />

(in chronological order; suggestions: edit@metalog.org)<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!