Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
[Deputy Ruairí Quinn.] Questions— 14 February 2012. Written Answers The selection and enrolment of pupils in schools is the responsibility of the authorities of the individual school. My Department’s main responsibility is to ensure that schools in an area can, between them, cater for all pupils seeking school places in an area. However, this may result in some pupils not obtaining a place in the school of their first choice. As schools may not have a place for every applicant, a selection process may be necessary. This selection process and the enrolment policy on which it is based must be non-discriminatory and must be applied fairly in respect of all applicants. Under section 15(2)(d) of the Education Act 1998, each school is legally obliged to disclose its enrolment policy and to ensure that as regards that policy that principles of equality and the right of parents to send their children to a school of the parents choice are respected. Section 29 of the Education Act 1998 provides for an appeal by a parent or guardian to the Secretary General of my Department, or in the case of a vocational education committee (VEC) school to the VEC in the first instance, where a board of management of a school, or a person acting on behalf of the board, refuses to enrol a student in a school, expels a student or suspends a student for 20 or more days in any school year. My Department has no authority to compel a school to admit a pupil, except in the case of an appeal under section 29 of the Education Act 1998 being upheld. The parents/guardians of the pupil in question may wish to contact my Department at the section 29 appeals administration unit, Friar’s Mill Road, Mullingar, County Westmeath, phone 044-9337008, if they wish to take an appeal under section 29 of the Education Act 1998. The National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) is the statutory agency which can assist parents who are experiencing difficulty in securing a school place for their child. The NEWB may be able to offer assistance and advice on securing a school placement within the pupil’s area. The contact details for the NEWB in the area is National Educational Welfare Board, Block 3 Floor 1, Grove Court, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, phone number 01-8103260. State Examinations 207. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he will provide a breakdown of the costs involved in having second level leaving certificate mock examinations marked externally; his views on parents having to pay for the marking of mock exams; and should he ensure mock exams are assessed internally as a cost saving measure. [7715/12] Minister for Education and Skills (Deputy Ruairí Quinn): Mock examinations are not part of the State examinations system. The decision to organise and/or charge for mock examinations is made at school level, and mock examinations are not a requirement of my Department. Schools are provided with capitation and school services grants to meet their running costs. Postprimary schools receive school services grant of €201 per pupil plus a capitation grant of €317 per pupil. DEIS schools also receive additional funds for targeted interventions to improve educational outcomes for students at risk. Schools are free to prioritise these resources in accordance with the overall needs of the school. Assessment is part of the core work of every teacher. While many schools wish to provide students with the experience of assessment under examination conditions, I see no educational advantage in such arrangements being externally marked. Ideally, if there are to be mock exams, they should be marked by the class teacher. Having the class teacher involved in assessment and giving clear feedback to students on strengths and weaknesses is a vital part of assessment for learning. While schools in the free education scheme may seek voluntary contributions from parents, they may not charge fees for teaching and learning activities scheduled 410
Questions— 14 February 2012. Written Answers as part of the school day, or exclude students from such services for non payment of a fee. It is important for schools to be sensitive to the financial pressures on families. The Department is not in a position to provide additional funding towards the cost of mock examinations. Schools Building Projects 208. Deputy Robert Dowds asked the Minister for Education and Skills the position regarding a site for a new school building (details supplied). [7721/12] Minister for Education and Skills (Deputy Ruairí Quinn): My Department has carried out a number of site assessments with a view to identifying a suitable site for the school referred to by the Deputy. Due to commercial sensitivities attaching to site acquisitions generally it is not possible for me to comment further at this time. Disadvantaged Status 209. Deputy Seán Crowe asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he will explain the qualifying criteria for the designation of DEIS band one and two schools; the frequency that DEIS band status is reviewed; the person responsible for initiating a review of a DEIS schools status; and the appeals procedures should a school lose its DEIS status. [7726/12] Minister for Education and Skills (Deputy Ruairí Quinn): The process of identifying schools for participation in DEIS in 2005 was managed by the Educational Research Centre (ERC) on behalf of my Department and supported by quality assurance work co-ordinated through the Department’s regional offices and the Inspectorate. ERC’s overall approach was guided by the definition of educational disadvantage set out in the Education Act 1998 as “the impediments to education arising from social or economic disadvantage which prevent students from deriving appropriate benefit from education in schools”. The identification process was devised by the ERC and had regard to and employed the existing and most appropriate data sources available. In the primary sector, the identification process was based on a survey carried out by the ERC and the identification of schools for participation in DEIS followed an analysis of the survey returns from primary schools. Furthermore, an appeal mechanism was put in place in 2006 to address the concerns of schools that did not qualify for inclusion in DEIS but regarded themselves as having a level of disadvantage which was of a scale sufficient to warrant their inclusion in the programme. An ongoing evaluation of DEIS has been underway since the roll-out of supports commenced in 2006. My Department commissioned the Educational Research Centre to undertake this evaluation, the aim of which is to monitor the implementation of the programme and assess its impact on students and schools at primary and post primary levels. In addition, the Inspectorate of my Department conducted evaluations of planning in a sample of 36 DEIS schools, 18 primary and 18 post-primary. A national composite report on the effectiveness of DEIS planning in primary and post-primary schools has been completed and this report along with the ERC report have been published. My Department will fully consider these evaluation reports before any decisions can be made regarding the future of DEIS. While a key priority for me is to continue to prioritise and target resources at schools with the most concentrated levels of educational disadvantage, the current economic climate and the challenge to meet significant targets on reducing public expenditure limits opportunities and means that there is no capacity to provide for additionality to the DEIS programme. 411
- Page 39 and 40: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 41 and 42: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 43 and 44: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 45 and 46: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 47 and 48: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 49 and 50: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 51 and 52: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 53 and 54: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 55 and 56: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 57 and 58: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 59 and 60: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 61 and 62: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 63 and 64: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 65 and 66: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 67 and 68: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 69 and 70: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 71 and 72: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 73 and 74: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 75 and 76: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 77 and 78: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 79 and 80: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 81 and 82: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 83 and 84: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 85 and 86: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 87 and 88: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 89: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 93 and 94: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 95 and 96: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 97 and 98: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 99 and 100: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 101 and 102: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 103 and 104: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 105 and 106: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 107 and 108: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 109 and 110: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 111 and 112: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 113 and 114: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 115 and 116: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 117 and 118: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 119 and 120: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 121 and 122: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 123 and 124: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 125 and 126: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 127 and 128: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 129 and 130: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 131 and 132: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 133 and 134: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 135 and 136: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 137 and 138: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 139 and 140: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
[Deputy Ruairí Quinn.]<br />
Questions— 14 February 2012. <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong><br />
The selection and enrolment <strong>of</strong> pupils in schools is <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authorities <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> individual school. My Department’s main responsibility is to ensure that schools in an area<br />
can, between <strong>the</strong>m, cater for all pupils seeking school places in an area. However, this may<br />
result in some pupils not obtaining a place in <strong>the</strong> school <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir first choice. As schools may<br />
not have a place for every applicant, a selection process may be necessary. This selection<br />
process and <strong>the</strong> enrolment policy on which it is based must be non-discriminatory and must be<br />
applied fairly in respect <strong>of</strong> all applicants.<br />
Under section 15(2)(d) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Act 1998, each school is legally obliged to disclose<br />
its enrolment policy and to ensure that as regards that policy that principles <strong>of</strong> equality and<br />
<strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> parents to send <strong>the</strong>ir children to a school <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parents choice are respected.<br />
Section 29 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Act 1998 provides for an appeal by a parent or guardian to <strong>the</strong><br />
Secretary General <strong>of</strong> my Department, or in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a vocational education committee<br />
(VEC) school to <strong>the</strong> VEC in <strong>the</strong> first instance, where a board <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong> a school, or<br />
a person acting on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> board, refuses to enrol a student in a school, expels a student<br />
or suspends a student for 20 or more days in any school year. My Department has no authority<br />
to compel a school to admit a pupil, except in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> an appeal under section 29 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Education Act 1998 being upheld.<br />
The parents/guardians <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pupil in question may wish to contact my Department at <strong>the</strong><br />
section 29 appeals administration unit, Friar’s Mill Road, Mullingar, County Westmeath, phone<br />
044-9337008, if <strong>the</strong>y wish to take an appeal under section 29 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Act 1998.<br />
The National Educational Welfare Board (NEWB) is <strong>the</strong> statutory agency which can assist<br />
parents who are experiencing difficulty in securing a school place for <strong>the</strong>ir child. The NEWB<br />
may be able to <strong>of</strong>fer assistance and advice on securing a school placement within <strong>the</strong> pupil’s<br />
area. The contact details for <strong>the</strong> NEWB in <strong>the</strong> area is National Educational Welfare Board,<br />
Block 3 Floor 1, Grove Court, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, phone number 01-8103260.<br />
State Examinations<br />
207. Deputy Seán Crowe asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Education and Skills if he will provide a<br />
breakdown <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs involved in having second level leaving certificate mock examinations<br />
marked externally; his views on parents having to pay for <strong>the</strong> marking <strong>of</strong> mock exams; and<br />
should he ensure mock exams are assessed internally as a cost saving measure. [7715/12]<br />
Minister for Education and Skills (Deputy Ruairí Quinn): Mock examinations are not part <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> State examinations system. The decision to organise and/or charge for mock examinations is<br />
made at school level, and mock examinations are not a requirement <strong>of</strong> my Department. Schools<br />
are provided with capitation and school services grants to meet <strong>the</strong>ir running costs. Postprimary<br />
schools receive school services grant <strong>of</strong> €201 per pupil plus a capitation grant <strong>of</strong> €317<br />
per pupil. DEIS schools also receive additional funds for targeted interventions to improve<br />
educational outcomes for students at risk. Schools are free to prioritise <strong>the</strong>se resources in<br />
accordance with <strong>the</strong> overall needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> school.<br />
Assessment is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> core work <strong>of</strong> every teacher. While many schools wish to provide<br />
students with <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> assessment under examination conditions, I see no educational<br />
advantage in such arrangements being externally marked. Ideally, if <strong>the</strong>re are to be mock<br />
exams, <strong>the</strong>y should be marked by <strong>the</strong> class teacher. Having <strong>the</strong> class teacher involved in assessment<br />
and giving clear feedback to students on strengths and weaknesses is a vital part <strong>of</strong><br />
assessment for learning. While schools in <strong>the</strong> free education scheme may seek voluntary contributions<br />
from parents, <strong>the</strong>y may not charge fees for teaching and learning activities scheduled<br />
410