Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
[Deputy Thomas P. Broughan.] Questions— 14 February 2012. Written Answers taxation and if he approves of this policy; his views that this facilitates tax avoidance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8309/12] Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): Unfortunately, it was not possible to collate the information required for this answer in the time allowed. I will provide the Deputy with the answer in writing shortly. 138. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance his views on a matter (details supplied) regarding excise rate on diesel; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8450/12] Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners, who are responsible for the collection of mineral oil tax and for tackling the illicit trade in mineral oil products, that they are acutely aware of the various illegal activities that lead to loss to the Exchequer of mineral oil tax. The most serious risk in this regard is the large scale laundering of markers from mineral oil (diesel), and the onward supply and sale of the laundered product as auto diesel. Marked mineral oil is subject to a reduced rate of mineral oil tax on condition that it is not used in road vehicles. The suggestion has been made that the present system of marking diesel for non-auto use should be replaced by one in which all diesel would be subject to the same rate of mineral oil tax, with repayment arrangements for certain users. A system of this kind would, however, give rise to additional administrative work for both the users concerned and for the Revenue Commissioners, would impose cash flow costs on users and could be open to fraud and abuse. The focus, therefore, is on strengthening the existing regime for taxing diesel at differential rates, including the implementation of enhanced licensing systems, acquiring a more effective marker, and continued robust enforcement action. Departmental Staff 139. Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked the Minister for Finance the overtime cost attributable to staff attendance for the exceptional opening of Revenue’s lo-call service on Saturday, 7 January 2012; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7545/12] Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the cost of overtime attributable to staff attendance for the exceptional opening of Revenue’s lo-call service on Saturday, 7 January 2012 is €39,080.67. Tax Code 140. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance when the return of income form 12 for 2011 will be available from the Revenue in view of the fact that many pensioners are being advised to complete the form and it is not yet available. [7560/12] Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the 2011 version of the Form 12 is currently being finalised and should be available very soon. This is in line with the usual timetable for the production of the form. In the meantime, if a taxpayer wishes to complete a return of income for 2011 they should contact their local Revenue office where they will be issued with an adapted version of the 2010 Form 12 for that purpose. However, they will not be disadvantaged in any way by waiting for the correct form. I am further advised by the Revenue Commissioners that they are currently developing a significantly shorter version of the existing Form 12 specifically to cater for the needs of pensioners and other PAYE taxpayers whose tax affairs are more straightforward. The intention is that a draft of the short Form 12 (Form 12S) will be circulated to a range of groups representing the elderly and other pensioners for their views on the layout of the proposed new 364
Questions— 14 February 2012. Written Answers form, its suitability and ease of completion. It is Revenue’s intention to complete the consultation process as quickly as possible and to have the Form 12S available for completion as a matter of urgency. 141. Deputy Pat Deering asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider a special higher tax rate for those in receipt of retirement packages greater than €200,000.00. [7609/12] Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): It is not clear from the question whether the Deputy’s reference to “retirement packages” is to retirement lump sums or to the combination of lump sum and pension. An individual in receipt of pension income is liable to tax on that income at his or her marginal rate of income tax. I have no plans to change these arrangements. I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that two separate tax treatments can apply to lump sum payments depending on the nature of the lump sums paid to a retiring individual. (These rules apply equally to all employees — public and private sectors). The details of these treatments are set out hereunder. It should be noted that the lifetime limits on the amounts of lump sums that can be paid tax-free under pension arrangements or as termination payments were reduced to €200,000 in last year’s Finance Act. I have no plans for further changes in this area at this time. Retirement lump sums paid under pension arrangements The following arrangements apply to retirement lump sums paid under Revenue approved pension arrangements: • Lump sum amounts up to €200,000 are paid free of tax. They are also paid free of Universal Social Charge (USC). • The portion of a lump sum between €200,001 and €575,000 is taxed on a ring-fenced basis at 20%. (This means that no tax credits or other tax reliefs can be set against this portion of the lump sum.) No USC is chargeable. • Any amount of a lump sum in excess of €575,000 is taxed at the individual’s marginal rate of tax (credits and other tax reliefs are available). In this instance, USC is chargeable on the excess. These amounts are lifetime amounts with prior lump sums aggregating with later lump sums. Termination lump sums Section 201 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 and Schedule 3 to that Act set out the legislation in relation to the exemptions that apply to ex-gratia payments including retirement gratuities, and the taxation of any balance after applying these exemptions. The same rules apply to all employees and office holders in receipt of ex-gratia payments. Statutory redundancy payments are exempt from income tax. In addition, there are additional exemption limits for ex-gratia redundancy payments or retirement gratuities in excess of the statutory redundancy amount, namely— • a basic exemption of €10,160 plus €765 per complete year of actual service in excess of the statutory redundancy payment; Or • Standard Capital Superannuation Benefit i.e. 1/15th of the person’s annual income (average of the last three years) for each year of employment less any tax-free lump sum which is received or receivable under any approved or statutory pension scheme. It is open to the taxpayer to choose whichever relief is of most benefit. 365
- Page 1 and 2: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 3 and 4: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 5 and 6: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 7 and 8: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 9 and 10: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 11 and 12: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 13 and 14: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 15 and 16: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 17 and 18: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 19 and 20: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 21 and 22: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 23 and 24: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 25 and 26: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 27 and 28: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 29 and 30: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 31 and 32: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 33 and 34: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 35 and 36: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 37 and 38: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 39 and 40: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 41 and 42: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 43: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 47 and 48: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 49 and 50: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 51 and 52: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 53 and 54: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 55 and 56: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 57 and 58: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 59 and 60: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 61 and 62: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 63 and 64: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 65 and 66: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 67 and 68: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 69 and 70: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 71 and 72: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 73 and 74: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 75 and 76: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 77 and 78: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 79 and 80: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 81 and 82: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 83 and 84: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 85 and 86: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 87 and 88: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 89 and 90: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 91 and 92: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
- Page 93 and 94: Questions— 14 February 2012. Writ
[Deputy Thomas P. Broughan.]<br />
Questions— 14 February 2012. <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong><br />
taxation and if he approves <strong>of</strong> this policy; his views that this facilitates tax avoidance; and if he<br />
will make a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [8309/12]<br />
Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): Unfortunately, it was not possible to collate<br />
<strong>the</strong> information required for this answer in <strong>the</strong> time allowed. I will provide <strong>the</strong> Deputy with<br />
<strong>the</strong> answer in writing shortly.<br />
138. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Finance his views on a matter (details<br />
supplied) regarding excise rate on diesel; and if he will make a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter.<br />
[8450/12]<br />
Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): I am informed by <strong>the</strong> Revenue Commissioners,<br />
who are responsible for <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> mineral oil tax and for tackling <strong>the</strong> illicit trade<br />
in mineral oil products, that <strong>the</strong>y are acutely aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various illegal activities that lead to<br />
loss to <strong>the</strong> Exchequer <strong>of</strong> mineral oil tax. The most serious risk in this regard is <strong>the</strong> large scale<br />
laundering <strong>of</strong> markers from mineral oil (diesel), and <strong>the</strong> onward supply and sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laundered<br />
product as auto diesel. Marked mineral oil is subject to a reduced rate <strong>of</strong> mineral oil tax<br />
on condition that it is not used in road vehicles. The suggestion has been made that <strong>the</strong> present<br />
system <strong>of</strong> marking diesel for non-auto use should be replaced by one in which all diesel would<br />
be subject to <strong>the</strong> same rate <strong>of</strong> mineral oil tax, with repayment arrangements for certain users.<br />
A system <strong>of</strong> this kind would, however, give rise to additional administrative work for both <strong>the</strong><br />
users concerned and for <strong>the</strong> Revenue Commissioners, would impose cash flow costs on users<br />
and could be open to fraud and abuse. The focus, <strong>the</strong>refore, is on streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>the</strong> existing<br />
regime for taxing diesel at differential rates, including <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> enhanced licensing<br />
systems, acquiring a more effective marker, and continued robust enforcement action.<br />
Departmental Staff<br />
139. Deputy Ciarán Lynch asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Finance <strong>the</strong> overtime cost attributable to<br />
staff attendance for <strong>the</strong> exceptional opening <strong>of</strong> Revenue’s lo-call service on Saturday, 7 January<br />
2012; and if he will make a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [7545/12]<br />
Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): I am advised by <strong>the</strong> Revenue Commissioners<br />
that <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> overtime attributable to staff attendance for <strong>the</strong> exceptional opening <strong>of</strong><br />
Revenue’s lo-call service on Saturday, 7 January 2012 is €39,080.67.<br />
Tax Code<br />
140. Deputy Michael McGrath asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Finance when <strong>the</strong> return <strong>of</strong> income<br />
form 12 for 2011 will be available from <strong>the</strong> Revenue in view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that many pensioners<br />
are being advised to complete <strong>the</strong> form and it is not yet available. [7560/12]<br />
Minister for Finance (Deputy Michael Noonan): I am advised by <strong>the</strong> Revenue Commissioners<br />
that <strong>the</strong> 2011 version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Form 12 is currently being finalised and should be available very<br />
soon. This is in line with <strong>the</strong> usual timetable for <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> form. In <strong>the</strong> meantime,<br />
if a taxpayer wishes to complete a return <strong>of</strong> income for 2011 <strong>the</strong>y should contact <strong>the</strong>ir local<br />
Revenue <strong>of</strong>fice where <strong>the</strong>y will be issued with an adapted version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2010 Form 12 for that<br />
purpose. However, <strong>the</strong>y will not be disadvantaged in any way by waiting for <strong>the</strong> correct form.<br />
I am fur<strong>the</strong>r advised by <strong>the</strong> Revenue Commissioners that <strong>the</strong>y are currently developing a<br />
significantly shorter version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing Form 12 specifically to cater for <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> pensioners<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r PAYE taxpayers whose tax affairs are more straightforward. The intention<br />
is that a draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> short Form 12 (Form 12S) will be circulated to a range <strong>of</strong> groups representing<br />
<strong>the</strong> elderly and o<strong>the</strong>r pensioners for <strong>the</strong>ir views on <strong>the</strong> layout <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed new<br />
364