Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[Deputy Jan O’Sullivan.]<br />
Questions— 14 February 2012. <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong><br />
Section 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roads Act empowers a local authority to, by order, declare any road over<br />
which a public right <strong>of</strong> way exists to be a public road. Before making an order <strong>the</strong> local<br />
authority must be satisfied <strong>the</strong> road is <strong>of</strong> general public utility, consider <strong>the</strong> financial implications<br />
<strong>of</strong> taking <strong>the</strong> road in charge and consult with <strong>the</strong> public/consider any objections<br />
received. The consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objections and <strong>the</strong> making <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order declaring <strong>the</strong> road<br />
to be a public road is a reserved function, so that <strong>the</strong> decision whe<strong>the</strong>r to take <strong>the</strong> road in<br />
charge is ultimately one for <strong>the</strong> discretion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elected members.<br />
In relation to estates which have not been completed to <strong>the</strong> satisfaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> planning<br />
authority and enforcement proceedings have not been commenced within <strong>the</strong> relevant period<br />
section 180 also provides that <strong>the</strong> planning authority must, if requested to do so by <strong>the</strong> majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> owners, initiate <strong>the</strong> procedures in section 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roads Act. However, in this case <strong>the</strong><br />
section provides that <strong>the</strong> provision in section 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roads Act requiring <strong>the</strong> authority to<br />
consider <strong>the</strong> financial implications <strong>of</strong> taking <strong>the</strong> road in charge shall be disregarded. Section<br />
180 also provides that where a planning authority, in complying with section 180, makes an<br />
order under section 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roads Act, it must also take in charge any open spaces, car parks,<br />
sewers, watermains, or drains within <strong>the</strong> attendant grounds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development.<br />
Section 180 was amended in <strong>the</strong> Planning and Development (Amendment) Act 2010 to<br />
provide that a planning authority may take in charge an unfinished estate, at <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
owners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> housing units, at any time after <strong>the</strong> expiration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> planning permission, in<br />
situations where enforcement actions have commenced or where <strong>the</strong> planning authority consider<br />
that enforcement action will not result in <strong>the</strong> satisfactory completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> estate by <strong>the</strong><br />
developer. Planning authorities have also been empowered to take in charge part <strong>of</strong> an estate<br />
or some, but not all, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facilities in an estate.<br />
Local Government Reform<br />
444. Deputy Finian McGrath asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for <strong>the</strong> Environment, Community and Local<br />
Government if <strong>the</strong>re are plans to abolish town councils (details supplied) under <strong>the</strong> local<br />
government reform plan. [8050/12]<br />
Minister for <strong>the</strong> Environment, Community and Local Government (Deputy Phil Hogan): I<br />
refer to <strong>the</strong> reply to Question No. 144 <strong>of</strong> 9 February 2012, which sets out <strong>the</strong> position in<br />
this matter.<br />
EU Directives<br />
445. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for <strong>the</strong> Environment, Community and Local<br />
Government if <strong>the</strong> ESB will have to pay for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> water for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> production<br />
<strong>of</strong> hydroelectricity based on <strong>the</strong> reasoned opinion received from <strong>the</strong> European Commission in<br />
November 2011; <strong>the</strong> reply sent to <strong>the</strong> Union regarding same; and if he will make a statement<br />
on <strong>the</strong> matter. [8121/12]<br />
446. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for <strong>the</strong> Environment, Community and Local<br />
Government if Waterways Ireland will have to pay for <strong>the</strong> abstraction <strong>of</strong> water for use in <strong>the</strong><br />
Royal Canal, <strong>the</strong> Grand Canal, <strong>the</strong> Shannon-Erne Waterway and o<strong>the</strong>r man-made waterways<br />
as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reasoned opinion from <strong>the</strong> European Union in November 2011; <strong>the</strong> reply sent<br />
by him regarding same to <strong>the</strong> Union; and if he will make a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [8122/12]<br />
466. Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for <strong>the</strong> Environment, Community and Local<br />
Government if he has replied to <strong>the</strong> reasoned opinion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU Commission <strong>of</strong> 24 November<br />
534