PATEL HYPOTHESIS OF RESEARCH EVALUATION - CIBTech

Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences ISSN: 2231-6345 (Online)
An Online International Journal Available at http://www.cibtech.org/jls.htm
2011 Vol. 1 (4) October-December, pp.155-163/Patel
General Article
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am greatly thankful to my former guide and co-guide: Professor R. C. Rajak and Professor A. K.
Pandey respectively, Department of Biological Science, Rani Durgavati University Jabalpur, Madhya
Pradesh, India.
REFERENCES
Agrawal A (2005). Corruption of journal impact factors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20 (4) 157.
Banks MG (2006). An extension of the Hirsch-index: indexing scientific topics and compounds.
Scientometrics 69 (1) 161-168.
Braun T, Glenjel W, Shubert A (2006). A hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 69 (1) 169-
173.
Costas R and Bordons M (2007). Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric
indicators at the microlevel. Journal of Informatics 1 (3) 193-203.
Christoph B and Servaas K (2011). Detecting h-index manipulation through self citation analysis.
Scientometrics 87 (1) 85-98.
Douglas NA and Kristine KF (2011). Nefarious numbers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society
58(3) 434-437.
Egghe L (2006). Theory and practices of the g-index. Scientometrics 69 (1) 131-152.
Erjen VN (2009). Why do statistics journals have low impact factor Statistica Neerlandica 63(1) 52-62.
Fassoulaki A, Papilas K, Paraskeva A, and Patris K (2002). Impact factor bias and proposed
adjustments for its derermination. Acta Annaesthesiologica Scandinavia 46 (7) 902-905.
Garfield E (1955). Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of
ideas. Science 122 (3159) 108-111.
Garfield E (2005). The agony and the ecstasy: the history and meaning of the journal impact factor.
International Congress on Peer review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago, September, page number 6.
Garfield E (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. The Journal of American
Medical Association 295(1) 90-93.
Hirsch E (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 192 (46) 16569-16572.
Jasco P (2009). The h-index for countries in web of science and scopus. Online Information Review 33
(4) 831-837.
Jin BH, Liang LM, Roussean R, Egghe L (2007). The R and AR-indices: complementing the h-index.
Chinese Science Bulletin 52 (6) 8355-863.
McRoberts MH and McRoberts BR (2010). Problems of citation analysis: a study of uncited and
seldom cited influences. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (1) 1-
12.
Namazi MR, Fallahzadah MK (2010). N-index: a novel and easily calculable parameter for comparison
of researcher working in different scientific fields. Indian Journal of Dermatology Vereneology and
Leprology 76 (3) 229-230.
Pratap G (2010). The hundred most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics 84 (1)167-172.
Riikonen P and Vihinen M (2008). National research contributions: a case study on Finnista biomedial
research. Scientometrics 77 (2) 207-222.
Schreiber M (2010). Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to
highly cited papers. Annles der Physik 19 (8) 536-554.
Seglen PO (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British
Medical Journal 314 (7079) 498-502.
Vaan-Raaan AFJ (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with
peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 67 (3) 491-502.
162