09.01.2015 Views

Gardner - Supply Chain Performance Management at the ...

Gardner - Supply Chain Performance Management at the ...

Gardner - Supply Chain Performance Management at the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Department of Veterans Affairs<br />

Using a SCOR Baseline<br />

Nelson Gonzalez<br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egic Sourcing Program Manager<br />

Office of Acquisition & Logistics Programs & Policy<br />

Department of Veterans Affairs<br />

Brian K. Frank<br />

Associ<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Booz|Allen|Hamilton, Inc.<br />

Brian L. Shaw<br />

Associ<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Booz|Allen|Hamilton, Inc.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> World North America – April 4, 2012<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 1 | 28 March 2012


Table of Contents<br />

VA <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Transform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

SCOR Baseline<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics<br />

Prototype <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Dashboard<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 2 | 28 March 2012


We have an oblig<strong>at</strong>ion to provide assistance for Veterans for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

entire lives. The size and complexity of <strong>the</strong> supply chain to support<br />

this network dwarfs any o<strong>the</strong>r government or commercial organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

4.1 million Veterans & survivors receiving compens<strong>at</strong>ion & pension benefits (end of FY10)<br />

45.8 billion in active compens<strong>at</strong>ion & pension benefit accounts (end of FY10)<br />

8 million Veterans enrolled in healthcare programs<br />

13 million bed days of care (FY10) 1<br />

75 million outp<strong>at</strong>ient visits (FY10)<br />

111,800 interments in FY10<br />

- - - - - -<br />

16.3 million items consumed 4<br />

5 major commodity groups<br />

1.3 million contract actions 2<br />

$17.4B in annual spend<br />

174,722 contracts 3<br />

27,176 suppliers 3<br />

5000 PMs/COTRs<br />

5500 logistics staff<br />

3000 contracting officers<br />

6 leaders of contracting<br />

$12.7B value of equipment 5<br />

366 million hours of direct labor 1<br />

- - - - - -<br />

56 Regional Benefit Offices, 350 Local Offices & Intake Sites<br />

153 Medical Centers, 807 Outp<strong>at</strong>ient Clinics, 288 Vet Centers<br />

3.1 million gravesites and 131 n<strong>at</strong>ional cemeteries in 39 st<strong>at</strong>es<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 3 | 28 March 2012<br />

Sources: 1-DSS; 2-FPDS (does not include purchases


VA <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Transform<strong>at</strong>ion 2012 - 2015<br />

Workforce Development<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Dashboard<br />

Technology Integr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egic Sourcing /<br />

Acquisition Savings<br />

GS1 D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

Standardiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Process Improvement /<br />

Inventory Reduction<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

Governance Board<br />

Supplier Rel<strong>at</strong>ionship<br />

Transform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 4 | 28 March 2012


Table of Contents<br />

VA <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Transform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

SCOR Baseline<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics<br />

Prototype <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Dashboard<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 5 | 28 March 2012


We conducted interviews and collected d<strong>at</strong>a from various sources to<br />

help define <strong>the</strong> baseline, assess <strong>the</strong> supply chain and ultim<strong>at</strong>ely,<br />

recommend a performance management str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a Collection<br />

SCOR Project Approach<br />

Deliverables<br />

SCOR<br />

Process/Metrics<br />

VA OA&L Functional<br />

Interviews<br />

Booz Allen <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong>/<br />

Logistics Expertise<br />

VA Procurement<br />

Reform Task Force Report<br />

Current VA<br />

Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion Charts<br />

VA OA&MM 2006-2010<br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egic Plan<br />

VA 2011 Budget<br />

PwC <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

Transform<strong>at</strong>ion Study<br />

VA Handbook<br />

7002<br />

VA’s “13 Gre<strong>at</strong>est<br />

Challenges”<br />

VHA CP&LO<br />

Interviews<br />

NCA Functional<br />

(Logistics) Interview<br />

OAL and VHA<br />

Resource Libraries<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

M<strong>at</strong>urity Assessment<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

Measurement<br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

Enable <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

VAAA<br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

SDC<br />

P<br />

EP ES<br />

OAL<br />

MBR<br />

IT<br />

VACO<br />

Center for<br />

Acquisition<br />

Innov<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

CFM<br />

Med/<br />

Surg HCS<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

Measurement Framework<br />

D<br />

R<br />

Mission, Vision,<br />

Goals<br />

SCOR Framework<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

Measures<br />

1. Define Scope<br />

2. Design<br />

ES S<br />

ER<br />

N<strong>at</strong>ional Acquisition<br />

Center<br />

Technical Acquisition<br />

Center<br />

Suppliers<br />

Pharm<br />

Nutrition<br />

PLANNING AND EXECUTION<br />

Enablers<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

IT/D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

Collection and<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Production<br />

Risk<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Denver<br />

Acquisition<br />

and Logistics<br />

Center<br />

.<br />

Inventory<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

Distribution/<br />

Transport<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Infrastructure<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

S<br />

Regional<br />

Contract Center<br />

S<br />

Veterans<br />

Procurement<br />

Returns/ Retrograde<br />

Customer<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

SAO-E<br />

SAO-C<br />

SAO-W<br />

VHA<br />

Product Lifecycle<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

P<br />

ES EP<br />

VBA<br />

OAL<br />

NCA<br />

S<br />

P<br />

M<br />

R<br />

Administr<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Benefit Offices/<br />

Centers<br />

OAL<br />

Hospitals/<br />

Cemeteries<br />

Clinics<br />

D<br />

Human Resources<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Service Providers<br />

3. Develop & Test<br />

4. Implement<br />

OAL <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Measurement Dashboard<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 6 | 28 March 2012


The existing VA supply chain management construct and doctrine<br />

were <strong>the</strong>n compared to standard <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Oper<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Reference-model (SCOR) processes and metrics for fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis<br />

Plan<br />

Deliver<br />

Source<br />

Make<br />

Deliver<br />

Source<br />

Make<br />

Deliver<br />

Source<br />

Make<br />

Deliver<br />

Source<br />

Source: SCC<br />

Return Return<br />

Return Return Return Return Return Return<br />

Suppliers’<br />

Supplier<br />

Supplier<br />

VA<br />

Acquisition and Logistics<br />

Service<br />

Providers<br />

Veterans<br />

SCOR takes <strong>the</strong> segments of a supply chain, shows <strong>the</strong> players within each segment and <strong>the</strong> processes <strong>the</strong>y perform,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n shows <strong>the</strong> interrel<strong>at</strong>ionships of <strong>the</strong>se processes.<br />

There is a m<strong>at</strong>erial flow, an inform<strong>at</strong>ion flow, and a cash flow associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong>se processes.<br />

SCOR provides…<br />

Standard processes:<br />

Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, Enable<br />

Standard metrics:<br />

Perfect Order Delivery, <strong>Supply</strong>-<strong>Chain</strong> Cost, etc.<br />

Best practices:<br />

EDI, CPFR, etc.<br />

Pre-defined rel<strong>at</strong>ionships among processes,<br />

metrics and practices<br />

SCOR allows…<br />

Common supply chain terminology th<strong>at</strong><br />

transl<strong>at</strong>es across industries and organiz<strong>at</strong>ions,<br />

which permits:<br />

– Meaningful benchmarking with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

– Common metrics for performance assessment<br />

and comparison<br />

– Incorpor<strong>at</strong>ion of industry best practices to<br />

improve supply chain performance<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 7 | 28 March 2012


In <strong>the</strong> baseline, we identified <strong>the</strong> customers and suppliers as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> products required by <strong>the</strong> customers to define <strong>the</strong> supply chains<br />

Who are <strong>the</strong> stakeholders<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> are <strong>the</strong>ir responsibilities<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> processes are used<br />

Service Provider Profiles<br />

RACI M<strong>at</strong>rix<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> do we procure for<br />

our customers<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Scope<br />

Which customers require wh<strong>at</strong> products<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Definition M<strong>at</strong>rix<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 8 | 28 March 2012


Understanding organiz<strong>at</strong>ional supply chain rel<strong>at</strong>ionships and<br />

hierarchical process linkages are key to identifying performance<br />

measurement dependencies<br />

Enable <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

P = Plan<br />

S = Source<br />

M = Make<br />

D = Deliver<br />

R = Return<br />

E = Enable<br />

VA Acquisition<br />

Academy<br />

Transactions<br />

Formal Rel<strong>at</strong>ionships<br />

S<br />

R<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

Distribution<br />

Center<br />

P<br />

EP ES<br />

OAL<br />

Marketing &<br />

Business<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>ionships<br />

Pharm<br />

IT<br />

ES S<br />

ER<br />

VACO<br />

ES S<br />

ER<br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egic<br />

Acquisition<br />

Center<br />

D<br />

R<br />

Center for<br />

Acquisition<br />

Innov<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Suppliers<br />

Nutrition<br />

CFM Med/<br />

Surg HCS<br />

N<strong>at</strong>ional Acquisition<br />

Center<br />

ES S<br />

ES S<br />

ER<br />

ER<br />

Technical Acquisition<br />

Center<br />

ES<br />

S<br />

Denver ER<br />

Acquisition<br />

and Logistics<br />

Center<br />

M<br />

SAO-E<br />

SAO-C<br />

SAO-W<br />

ES S<br />

ER<br />

Regional<br />

Contract Center<br />

S<br />

Veterans<br />

VHA<br />

P<br />

ES EP<br />

VBA<br />

OAL<br />

NCA<br />

S<br />

P<br />

M<br />

R<br />

Administr<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

Service Providers<br />

Benefit Offices/<br />

Centers<br />

OAL<br />

Medical Centers/ Cemeteries<br />

Clinics<br />

D<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 9 | 28 March 2012


The medical supply chains are enabled by prime vendor contracts,<br />

as well as, n<strong>at</strong>ional and local contracts<br />

Veterans<br />

GOODS and SERVICES<br />

$$$/POLICY/GUIDANCE<br />

INFORMATION and REQUIREMENTS<br />

Oversight<br />

Requests<br />

Requirements<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 10 | 28 March 2012


The <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> M<strong>at</strong>urity Assessment is designed to provide a<br />

diagnostic approach to improving supply chain oper<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> M<strong>at</strong>urity Model Process<br />

Benefits<br />

Best practice assessment for<br />

each supply chain capability<br />

Aligned with SCOR framework<br />

Booz Allen’s <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Expertise<br />

Major findings by capability area<br />

Improvement opportunities<br />

mapped against organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

priorities and supply chain<br />

capability areas<br />

Structured Analytic Approach<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 11 | 28 March 2012


Source: VA Interviews and Surveys, Booz Allen Hamilton Analysis<br />

Focus areas for improvement can be gleaned by comparing<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ional priorities to process m<strong>at</strong>urity<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 12 | 28 March 2012


The <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> M<strong>at</strong>urity Assessment results provide <strong>the</strong> found<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

for pursuing improvement initi<strong>at</strong>ives; improvements in <strong>the</strong>se four<br />

focus areas will have a positive effect on <strong>the</strong> remaining areas<br />

Improvement<br />

Areas<br />

Improvement Initi<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

Objectives<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egy<br />

Organiz<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

awareness/alignment<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Quantified and<br />

consistent business<br />

outcomes<br />

IT/D<strong>at</strong>a Collection<br />

and <strong>Management</strong><br />

Enterprise visibility of<br />

supply chain<br />

requirements,<br />

resources and<br />

performance<br />

<br />

Risk <strong>Management</strong><br />

Str<strong>at</strong>egically-aligned<br />

and evidence-based<br />

resource management<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 13 | 28 March 2012


Table of Contents<br />

VA <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Transform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

SCOR Baseline<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics<br />

Prototype <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Dashboard<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 14 | 28 March 2012


<strong>Performance</strong> metrics will capture how well <strong>the</strong> supply chain<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ion supports <strong>the</strong> overall VA value stream<br />

Plan<br />

Currently, <strong>the</strong>re is visibility to Veteran-care<br />

outcomes, but little traceability to supply<br />

chain drivers, effects, and impact<br />

Deliver<br />

Source<br />

Make<br />

Deliver<br />

Source Make Deliver<br />

Source Make Deliver<br />

Source<br />

Return<br />

Return<br />

Return Return Return<br />

Return Return Return<br />

Source: SCC<br />

Suppliers’<br />

Supplier<br />

Supplier<br />

VA<br />

Acquisition and Logistics<br />

Service<br />

Providers<br />

Veterans<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> effects on “Outcomes”, leadership is interested in monitoring and<br />

optimizing <strong>the</strong> Quality, Responsiveness and Cost of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

• Wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>the</strong> Quality of supply chain product and service delivery<br />

• How Responsive is <strong>the</strong> supply chain to service providers<br />

• Wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>the</strong> Cost to <strong>the</strong> enterprise (rel<strong>at</strong>ive to overall expenditures)<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 15 | 28 March 2012<br />

15


The SCOR model includes metrics rel<strong>at</strong>ed to five performance <strong>at</strong>tributes<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Attribute Definition KPIs<br />

Responsiveness<br />

The speed <strong>at</strong> which a supply chain provides<br />

products to <strong>the</strong> customer<br />

Order Fulfillment Cycle Time<br />

Physical SCM<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> KPIs<br />

Reliability<br />

Flexibility<br />

Delivery of <strong>the</strong> correct product to <strong>the</strong> correct place<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> correct time in <strong>the</strong> correct condition and<br />

packaging in <strong>the</strong> correct quantity with <strong>the</strong> correct<br />

document<strong>at</strong>ion to <strong>the</strong> correct customer<br />

The agility of <strong>the</strong> supply chain in responding to<br />

changes in demand<br />

Perfect Order Fulfillment<br />

Upside <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Flexibility<br />

Upside <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Adaptability<br />

Downside <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Adaptability<br />

Financial SCM<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> KPIs<br />

Cost<br />

Asset<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

All costs associ<strong>at</strong>ed with oper<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> supply<br />

chain<br />

Effectiveness in <strong>the</strong> management of (fixed and<br />

working capital) assets used in <strong>the</strong> process of<br />

s<strong>at</strong>isfying demand<br />

Total Cost to Serve<br />

Cash-to-cash Cycle Time<br />

Return on <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> fixed assets<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 16 | 28 March 2012<br />

Source: <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council – SCOR model<br />

16


<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework: Three distinct levels of<br />

metrics illumin<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> health of <strong>the</strong> supply chain from <strong>the</strong> str<strong>at</strong>egic<br />

(top level), oper<strong>at</strong>ional, and diagnostic perspectives<br />

Quality: <strong>the</strong> measurement of how well <strong>the</strong> supply chain provides needed<br />

supplies and services to fill service provider (clinician) requirements<br />

Cost: sum of <strong>the</strong> costs associ<strong>at</strong>ed with<br />

acquiring, managing, and delivering<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erials and services to clinicians<br />

Responsiveness: measures how timely <strong>the</strong> goods and services<br />

are provided to <strong>the</strong> service provider (clinician)<br />

Order<br />

Fulfillment<br />

Cycle Time<br />

SR-01<br />

Perfect<br />

Order<br />

Fulfillment<br />

SQ-01<br />

Total<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong> Cost<br />

SC-01<br />

Top-level <strong>Performance</strong>:<br />

Measures overall performance in delivering on <strong>the</strong> mission<br />

and <strong>the</strong> str<strong>at</strong>egic goals and objectives. These metrics<br />

provide a broad end-to-end view of <strong>the</strong> supply chain.<br />

EIL<br />

Indices<br />

(In/Out P<strong>at</strong>ient)<br />

Equipment<br />

Availability R<strong>at</strong>e<br />

OR-01<br />

Estim<strong>at</strong>ed Inventory<br />

Usage Per P<strong>at</strong>ient<br />

(In/Out P<strong>at</strong>ient)<br />

Oblig<strong>at</strong>ion R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

(Labor $: M<strong>at</strong>erial $<br />

: Overhead $)<br />

OC-01<br />

Customer<br />

Fulfillment<br />

TSCC as a<br />

% of Total<br />

Budget<br />

OC-02<br />

Logistics<br />

Department Flow<br />

SCM / Oper<strong>at</strong>ional Effectiveness:<br />

Measures execution of particular<br />

aspects of supply chain oper<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

These metrics provide context to supply<br />

chain functions, often rel<strong>at</strong>ing one set of<br />

functions to ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

OC-03<br />

OC-04<br />

OQ-01<br />

OR-02<br />

Reutiliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

DC-01<br />

Average<br />

Inventory<br />

Value<br />

DC-02<br />

Inventory<br />

<strong>Management</strong> --<br />

Standard<br />

Items: On-<br />

Demand Items<br />

DR-01<br />

Inventory<br />

Stockouts<br />

DR-02<br />

Inventory<br />

Accuracy<br />

Days of<br />

<strong>Supply</strong><br />

Inventory<br />

Turns<br />

Value of<br />

Inventory<br />

(Long, and<br />

Inactive)<br />

Report<br />

of Survey<br />

(Value<br />

and Dur<strong>at</strong>ion)<br />

DQ-05 DC-03 DR-03 DC-04 DC-05<br />

Planned<br />

Cost to<br />

Actual Cost<br />

R<strong>at</strong>io<br />

DC-07<br />

SCM Diagnostics:<br />

Help identify factors<br />

affecting changes in<br />

performance measures.<br />

Orders<br />

Delivered<br />

in Full<br />

DQ-01<br />

Delivery Perf<br />

To Customer<br />

Required D<strong>at</strong>e<br />

DQ-02<br />

Document<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Accuracy<br />

DQ-03<br />

Perfect<br />

Condition<br />

DQ-04<br />

Contract<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Lead Time<br />

Average<br />

Age <strong>Supply</strong><br />

<strong>Chain</strong> Policy<br />

Compliance/<br />

Standardiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Percent<br />

Purchased on<br />

Existing<br />

Contracts<br />

Percent<br />

Purchased<br />

Electronically<br />

Transport<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Costs<br />

DR-04 DQ-06 DQ-07<br />

DR-05<br />

DR-06<br />

DC-06<br />

Spend Analysis<br />

(Method of<br />

Purchase)<br />

DQ-08<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 17 | 28 March 2012<br />

17


Metric Detail (Example)<br />

Order Fulfillment Cycle Time<br />

SR-01<br />

DEFINITION<br />

REASON FOR<br />

METRIC<br />

CALCULATION<br />

DATA<br />

ELEMENTS<br />

SOURCE<br />

DATA GAPS<br />

FREQUENCY<br />

Average actual cycle time consistently achieved to fulfill customer orders. For each individual order, this cycle time starts from <strong>the</strong><br />

purchase request placed for an order and ends with d<strong>at</strong>e of customer acceptance of <strong>the</strong> order.<br />

Cycle time improvements have been linked to reduced costs, reduced inventories, and increased capacity. Having to compens<strong>at</strong>e for a<br />

long cycle time drives a need for increased inventory. An increased inventory increases <strong>the</strong> days of supply; increased days of supply lowers<br />

inventory turns. Obviously, an increased inventory raises m<strong>at</strong>eriel costs in <strong>the</strong> supply chain. Order Fulfillment Cycle Time is a top level<br />

measure of <strong>the</strong> str<strong>at</strong>egic responsiveness of <strong>the</strong> supply chain; it is also a point of comparison to work towards cycle time reduction.<br />

Order Fulfillment Cycle Time = [Sum Actual Cycle Times For All Orders Delivered] / [Total Number Of Orders Delivered] Expressed in days.<br />

As shown in <strong>the</strong> example, <strong>the</strong> sum includes <strong>the</strong> elapsed time between <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> purchase order is assigned and <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> item is<br />

received.<br />

Currently, OFCT is measured as <strong>the</strong> time from <strong>the</strong> release of <strong>the</strong> purchase order to <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> order is received <strong>at</strong> facility inbound<br />

logistics. However, OFCT is commonly defined as <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> source cycle time and <strong>the</strong> delivery cycle time. Th<strong>at</strong> is, from purchase<br />

request until it is delivered to <strong>the</strong> end user, excluding non-value add time. In our case, Source Cycle Time to Primary Inventory is <strong>the</strong> time<br />

from purchase request to <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> purchase order is released + time until <strong>the</strong> order is received <strong>at</strong> facility inbound logistics; and Delivery<br />

Cycle Time is <strong>the</strong> time from order receipt <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> VA facility until it is delivered to user, currently only measured to <strong>the</strong> primary inventory.<br />

IFCAP<br />

• Item receipt time-stamp is not regularly recorded<br />

• Initial requirement d<strong>at</strong>e is not regularly recorded<br />

Monthly<br />

PurchaseOrderNum <strong>Supply</strong>St<strong>at</strong>us D<strong>at</strong>ePoAssigned PoD<strong>at</strong>e OriginalDeliveryD<strong>at</strong>e D<strong>at</strong>eReceived LineItemIDNum QtyReceived<br />

XXX-0U8570 Transaction Complete (Amended) 7/8/2010 7/8/2010 7/13/2010 7/14/2010 1 1<br />

XXX-0U8570 Transaction Complete (Amended) 7/8/2010 7/8/2010 7/13/2010 7/14/2010 2 2<br />

XXX-0U8570 Transaction Complete (Amended) 7/8/2010 7/8/2010 7/13/2010 7/14/2010 3 1<br />

XXX-A02051 Partial Order Received (Amended) 7/14/2010 7/14/2010 8/14/2010 8/18/2010 3 1<br />

XXX-A02051 Partial Order Received (Amended) 7/14/2010 7/14/2010 8/14/2010 8/18/2010 4 1<br />

XXX-A02051 Partial Order Received (Amended) 7/14/2010 7/14/2010 8/14/2010 9/7/2010 4 1<br />

XXX-P02854 Transaction Complete 8/30/2010 8/30/2010 9/9/2010 9/15/2010 1 6<br />

XXX-P02854 Transaction Complete 8/30/2010 8/30/2010 9/9/2010 9/15/2010 2 4<br />

XXX-P02854 Transaction Complete 8/30/2010 8/30/2010 9/9/2010 9/21/2010 2 2<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 18 | 28 March 2012


Table of Contents<br />

VA <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Transform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

SCOR Baseline<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics<br />

Prototype <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Dashboard<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 19 | 28 March 2012


The “Manage <strong>Performance</strong> of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong>” process has been<br />

visualized in a Prototype <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Dashboard<br />

1. <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

Health<br />

2. Opportunities for<br />

Savings<br />

3. Progress of<br />

Improvement<br />

Initi<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 20 | 28 March 2012


Prototype Dashboard D<strong>at</strong>a Processing<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a Sources:<br />

– Procurement Records<br />

– Inventory Records<br />

– Asset <strong>Management</strong> Records<br />

– Labor History<br />

– Customer Volume Records<br />

– Policy Records<br />

FY2010 d<strong>at</strong>a – illustr<strong>at</strong>ive only<br />

– Future implement<strong>at</strong>ion requires access to source authorit<strong>at</strong>ive d<strong>at</strong>abases<br />

Received approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 12GB of d<strong>at</strong>a from legacy systems<br />

– Limited granularity (e.g., PO numbers do not reveal <strong>the</strong> items ordered)<br />

– Many blank fields and records<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a required some prepar<strong>at</strong>ory work<br />

– Select primary inventories analyzed<br />

– Excluded some administr<strong>at</strong>ive c<strong>at</strong>egories, research, training, grounds upkeep, etc.<br />

– Classified costs as labor, m<strong>at</strong>erial, overhead, or not applicable<br />

– Required normalizing<br />

Did not try to cleanse <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a of mistakes or o<strong>the</strong>r anomalies<br />

– Graphics reflect d<strong>at</strong>a peculiarities (e.g., neg<strong>at</strong>ive inventory values)<br />

– Prototype not connected to live d<strong>at</strong>abases<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 21 | 28 March 2012


Dashboard effort focused on metrics th<strong>at</strong> already had available d<strong>at</strong>a;<br />

Where VA does not collect d<strong>at</strong>a <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ional-level, metrics are “Pending”<br />

On Display<br />

● Perfect Order Fulfillment (Notional*) (SQ-01)<br />

● Order Fulfillment Cycle Time (SR-01)<br />

● Total <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Cost (SC-01)<br />

● Customer Fulfillment (Notional*)(OQ-01)<br />

● Logistics Department Flow (OR-02)<br />

● Oblig<strong>at</strong>ion R<strong>at</strong>io (OC-01)<br />

● TSCC as Percent of Total Cost (OC-02)<br />

● SC EIL Index (OC-03)<br />

● Estim<strong>at</strong>ed Inventory Cost per P<strong>at</strong>ient Day (OC-04)<br />

Pending*<br />

● Equipment Availability R<strong>at</strong>e (OR-01)<br />

● Document<strong>at</strong>ion Accuracy (Notional*) (DQ-03)<br />

● Perfect Condition (Notional*) (DQ-04)<br />

● Inventory Accuracy (DQ-05)<br />

● Inventory Stockouts (DR-02)<br />

● Contract <strong>Management</strong> Lead Time (DR-04)<br />

● Percent Purchased Electronically (DR-05)<br />

● Planned Cost to Actual Cost (DC-07)<br />

● Orders Delivered in Full (DQ-01)<br />

● Delivered by Required D<strong>at</strong>e (DQ-02)<br />

● Average Age <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Policy (DQ-06)<br />

● Method of Purchase (DQ-08)<br />

● Compliance and Standardiz<strong>at</strong>ion (DQ-07)<br />

● Inventory <strong>Management</strong> – STD:ODI R<strong>at</strong>io (DR-01)<br />

● Inventory Turnover R<strong>at</strong>e (DR-03)<br />

● Percent Purchased on Existing Contracts (DR-05)<br />

● Reutiliz<strong>at</strong>ion (DC-01)<br />

● Average Inventory Value (DC-02)<br />

● Days of <strong>Supply</strong> (DC-03)<br />

● Value Long and Inactive <strong>Supply</strong> (DC-04)<br />

● Report of Survey Value and Dur<strong>at</strong>ion (DC-05)<br />

● Transport<strong>at</strong>ion Costs (DC-06)<br />

* Complete d<strong>at</strong>a not yet available<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 22 | 28 March 2012


Reports will be transmitted using various styles of visualiz<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />

help clarify trends, p<strong>at</strong>terns, and outliers.<br />

Combin<strong>at</strong>ion Charts are used to display such metrics as Reports of Survey and<br />

Perfect Order Fulfillment<br />

Bubble Charts are used to display Average Policy Age<br />

Line Charts are used for metrics such as Days of<br />

<strong>Supply</strong>, Inventory Turns, and Value of Long and Inactive<br />

Inventory<br />

Stacked Column Charts are used to display<br />

metrics such Standard to On Demand<br />

Inventory and Average Inventory Value<br />

Pie Charts are used to display Reutiliz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Bar Charts are used to display comparisons such as<br />

comparisons of Total <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Costs and comparisons of<br />

EIL Indices<br />

Multi-Series Column Charts are used to display<br />

metrics such as Oblig<strong>at</strong>ion R<strong>at</strong>io as well as<br />

aggreg<strong>at</strong>e reports.<br />

Column Charts are used to display comparisons<br />

such as Percent Purchasing on Existing Contracts<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 23 | 28 March 2012


The dashboard gives <strong>the</strong> analyst <strong>the</strong> opportunity to perform<br />

caus<strong>at</strong>ive research<br />

Average Inventory Value (DC-02)<br />

Long and Inactive <strong>Supply</strong> (DC-04)<br />

Days of <strong>Supply</strong> (DC-03)<br />

Standard to On Demand (DR-01a)<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 24 | 28 March 2012


The dashboard gives managers <strong>at</strong> all levels <strong>the</strong> ability to drill down<br />

and conduct caus<strong>at</strong>ive research into d<strong>at</strong>a outliers and anomalies<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a “rolls up” and allows for<br />

“drill down” transparency<br />

Identifies inconsistent or<br />

incomplete d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

Conduct compar<strong>at</strong>ive analysis<br />

between like facilities or<br />

contrasting metrics<br />

Highlights d<strong>at</strong>a outliers<br />

Facilit<strong>at</strong>es trend and<br />

root cause analyses<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 25 | 28 March 2012


Table of Contents<br />

VA <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Transform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

SCOR Baseline<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics<br />

Prototype <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Dashboard<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 26 | 28 March 2012


We have <strong>the</strong> metrics; we have <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a; we have <strong>the</strong> dashboard …<br />

…so wh<strong>at</strong> is next and how does it all fit toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

High d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

confidence,<br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

and accessibility<br />

lead to accur<strong>at</strong>e<br />

reports;<br />

it is <strong>the</strong> backbone<br />

of performance<br />

management<br />

D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

Metrics<br />

Linked to<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egic goals<br />

and objectives;<br />

will provide an<br />

assessment of<br />

supply chain<br />

health<br />

Establishes <strong>the</strong><br />

processes<br />

required for<br />

effective<br />

performance<br />

management of<br />

metrics<br />

sEP.2.1<br />

Define<br />

sEP.2<br />

Manage <strong>Performance</strong><br />

of <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong><br />

sEP.2.2<br />

Monitor<br />

Process<br />

sEP.2.3<br />

Evalu<strong>at</strong>e<br />

Organiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Establishes <strong>the</strong> roles,<br />

responsibilities, and<br />

team structure<br />

sEP.2.4<br />

Leverage<br />

Technology<br />

Provides<br />

visualiz<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

metrics and<br />

potential<br />

methods of<br />

implement<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 27 | 28 March 2012


Contact us <strong>at</strong>…<br />

• Nelson Gonzalez<br />

VA Str<strong>at</strong>egic Sourcing Program Manager<br />

Office of Acquisition & Logistics Programs & Policy<br />

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs<br />

Nelson.Gonzalez2@va.gov<br />

(202) 429-8439<br />

• Brian K. Frank<br />

Booz|Allen|Hamilton, Inc.<br />

frank_brian@bah.com<br />

(202) 429-2090<br />

• Brian L. Shaw<br />

Booz|Allen|Hamilton, Inc.<br />

shaw_brian@bah.com<br />

(202) 429-2074<br />

http://www.va.gov/<br />

© 2010 <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Council. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | <strong>Supply</strong> <strong>Chain</strong> Perf. Mgmt. <strong>at</strong> VA | Slide 28 | 28 March 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!