09.01.2015 Views

NEWCASTLE'S MUSICAL HERITAGE AN INTRODUCTION By ...

NEWCASTLE'S MUSICAL HERITAGE AN INTRODUCTION By ...

NEWCASTLE'S MUSICAL HERITAGE AN INTRODUCTION By ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

theatre orchestras in the district from whose ranks all the players had been<br />

drawn. In spite of this, the orchestra flourished and before the First World War<br />

an orchestral committee had been formed under Sir Henry Hadow, Principal of<br />

Armstrong College and the orchestra began a close association with the<br />

Conservatoire. In 1910, upon the resignation of Mr Rogers, the conductorship<br />

was taken over by Edgar Bainton (two years before he became Principal of the<br />

Conservatoire) and he held the post for twenty four years. In October 1911 the<br />

following notice appeared in The Musical Times:<br />

‘An important scheme is the enlargement of the Philharmonic Orchestra and the<br />

extension of its activities so as to include four concerts. The syllabus has not yet<br />

been issued, but I am able to state that at each concert a symphony will be<br />

played, Mozart, Beethoven, Tchaikovsky and Glazounow, being represented this<br />

season, and that at each concert one or more works by living British composers<br />

will be included. As the additions to the Orchestra comprise some of the best<br />

instrumentalists in the district, and a thorough plan of rehearsals has been drawn<br />

up by the conductor, Mr. E.J.Bainton, it looks as if the tentative attempts of the<br />

last two years to found a local permanent orchestra are likely to produce a<br />

scheme pregnant with rich possibilities. One important disadvantage the<br />

Orchestra labours under is that so many of its members are unable to get free<br />

from theartres and other positions of employment in the evenings and that<br />

concerts at present must be given in the afternoons.’<br />

Upon the resignation of Bainton in 1934 Dr Russell took over the post as<br />

conductor. At his debut in the City Hall. he made a speech, which was deemed in<br />

the press to be tactless, particularly as it came from a newcomer to the musical<br />

scene. Subsequent correspondence in the papers agreed with Dr Russell’s view<br />

that public support for the orchestra was poor, but not with his view that some of<br />

Yehudi Menuhin’s programme in a recent Celebrity concert was ‘a mere display<br />

of technical skill’ (shades of Charles Avison, which makes one wonder if there is<br />

not something in the bracing Tyneside air that inspires men to challenge giants)<br />

Russell also said that some professional players had not been remunerated for<br />

the previous concert which pointed to financial difficulties.<br />

Following the 1914 War the orchestra continued giving four to six concerts a<br />

season in the Palace Theatre. Their programmes were made up of the more<br />

substantial classical repetoire with liberal helpings of contemporary English<br />

music. There was variety in the rest of the programmes made up of more familiar<br />

orchestral pieces. A press review headed ‘First Post-War Concert in Newcastle’<br />

said that the orchestra was good enough to suggest that in the absence of any<br />

further breaks in its continuity of practice, Newcastle would soon have a really<br />

first-class orchestral combination of professional musicians, but regretted the<br />

absence of a proper place in the city for public music concerts. There was some<br />

suggestion that public support could have been better, but most people had to<br />

work for their living or were out of work and on the dole and did not have money<br />

to spend on tickets for symphony concerts. In any case the admission prices<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!