09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

over its investment as the determinative factor. 34 Much like franchise legislation<br />

in Canada, securities legislation requires that a prospectus be issued. The<br />

prospectus is a lengthy document that sets out details <strong>of</strong> the company, business<br />

management, finances, existing securities, and the securities being qualified.<br />

The prospectus must provide full, true and plain disclosure <strong>of</strong> all material facts.<br />

Certain facts are mandatory, such as the background <strong>of</strong> the issuer, its <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

and directors. These requirements are vital for policy reasons. 35<br />

Traditionally, securities regulation aimed to protect its investors by barring<br />

unscrupulous, fraudulent or incompetent issuers from taking advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

naive, unsophisticated investors. Currently, objectives <strong>of</strong> securities regulation<br />

include the protection <strong>of</strong> investors; ensuring that markets are fair, efficient and<br />

transparent; and the reduction <strong>of</strong> systemic risk. Investor protection is achieved<br />

in Canada, in part, through disclosure. Issuers, promoters and dealers must<br />

disclose certain amounts and types <strong>of</strong> information, both at the time <strong>of</strong> issue and<br />

on a continuous basis. Full, true and plain disclosure is a cornerstone <strong>of</strong> investor<br />

protection, allowing investors to assess properly the risks <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

investments. 36<br />

After drawing a parallel between franchise legislation and securities regulation,<br />

one quickly realizes that the same policy reasons for requiring disclosure apply<br />

to franchise law. Forcing franchisors to disclose franchise information to<br />

potential franchisees, as in securities, will be conducive to informed decision#<br />

making. In other words, demanding disclosure will allow franchisees to more<br />

properly assess their investment, thereby achieving the goal <strong>of</strong> franchise<br />

legislation. Therefore, Manitoba should adopt franchise legislation dictating<br />

adequate disclosure to make informed investment decisions.<br />

F. Conclusion<br />

Having considered the experience <strong>of</strong> franchisees in Manitoba and Ontario, it<br />

has become clear that there is <strong>of</strong>ten a power imbalance between franchisors and<br />

franchisees. Since many franchisees in Manitoba will be more inexperienced<br />

than the franchisors they intend to franchise with, there needs to be an<br />

instrument to level the playing field. This instrument is a franchises act. By<br />

providing disclosure <strong>of</strong> information pertaining to the franchise, as well as<br />

requiring that all parties act in good faith, a franchisee will receive some<br />

comfort that all parties are required to employ fair dealing, hopefully evening<br />

out the aforementioned power imbalance. In addition, because franchisees will<br />

be better informed after receiving a disclosure document required by franchise<br />

34<br />

David Johnston & Kathleen D. Rockwell, Canadian Securities Regulation, 3'd ed. (Markham:<br />

LexisNexis Canada, 2003) at 37-38.<br />

35<br />

Ibid. at 83--84.<br />

36<br />

Ibid. at 3-4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!