UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
86 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />
$50 000. Mr. Alard's store never opened and he received nothing in return for<br />
his deposit. 12 Although this is the only Pizza One case that has been reported in<br />
Manitoba, there are several examples in Ontario. 13<br />
It is important to note in this context that a review <strong>of</strong> court decisions is unlikely<br />
to provide an accurate representation <strong>of</strong> franchise disputes because some<br />
franchise agreements require arbitration and do not reach the courts. 14<br />
Nonetheless, the fact that some cases are still getting to court is somewhat<br />
indicative <strong>of</strong> what Mr. Maloway alluded to in 1992. In other words, Manitoba is<br />
facing a problem with franchisors abusing franchisees and legislation must be<br />
introduced to address the situation.<br />
B. The Ontario Example<br />
When considering Manitoba's need for franchise legislation, there are two<br />
primary reasons why Ontario's experience should be taken into account. First, it<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> the three provinces in Canada to have franchise legislation, and it is<br />
known as having the most franchisee friendly version. This is important in<br />
Manitoba because, according to the <strong>Law</strong> Commission's report, it is a franchisee<br />
rather than a franchisor province. 15 Second, when drafting model legislation,<br />
the Uniform <strong>Law</strong> Conference <strong>of</strong> Canada followed Ontario's legislation as its<br />
base. However, rather than looking at Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise<br />
Disclosure), 2000/ 6 the following will consider articles and Legislative Assembly<br />
discussions to determine what factors influenced the province to introduce such<br />
legislation.<br />
Ontario first addressed the idea <strong>of</strong> introducing franchise legislation with the<br />
Grange Report recommendations <strong>of</strong> 1971. 17 However, no act would come to<br />
fruition until the much publicized Pizza Pizza case, 887574 Ontario Inc. v. Pizza<br />
12<br />
Alexandra Paul, "City Man Burned by Pizza Franchise Scam,, Winnipeg Free Press, (12<br />
February 2007), online: Winnipeg Free Press Live ; Paul Turenne, "Avoid Being the Victim," Winnipeg<br />
Sun (12 February 2007), online: Winnipeg SUN Media .<br />
13<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the most recent Pizza One cases from Ontario include Ramjit v. 3 <strong>of</strong> 1 Pizza &<br />
Wings (Canada) Inc., [2004] CarswellOnt 6402; Scott v. 3 for 1 Pizza & Wings (Canada)<br />
Inc., [2003] CarswellOnt 3790; MAA Diners Inc. v. 3 for 1 Pizza and Wings (Canada) Inc.<br />
(2003), 30 B.L.R. (3d) 279i Ali v. Triple 3 Holdings Inc., [2001] O.J. No. 5755.<br />
14<br />
Manitoba <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission, "Consultation Paper on Franchise Legislation," online:<br />
Current Projects at 15.<br />
15<br />
Ibid. at 47.<br />
16<br />
s.o. 2000, c. 3.<br />
17<br />
S.G.M. Grange, Report <strong>of</strong> the Minister's Committee on Referral Sales, Multi Level Sales and<br />
Franchises, Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> Financial and Commercial Affairs (1971).