09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />

$50 000. Mr. Alard's store never opened and he received nothing in return for<br />

his deposit. 12 Although this is the only Pizza One case that has been reported in<br />

Manitoba, there are several examples in Ontario. 13<br />

It is important to note in this context that a review <strong>of</strong> court decisions is unlikely<br />

to provide an accurate representation <strong>of</strong> franchise disputes because some<br />

franchise agreements require arbitration and do not reach the courts. 14<br />

Nonetheless, the fact that some cases are still getting to court is somewhat<br />

indicative <strong>of</strong> what Mr. Maloway alluded to in 1992. In other words, Manitoba is<br />

facing a problem with franchisors abusing franchisees and legislation must be<br />

introduced to address the situation.<br />

B. The Ontario Example<br />

When considering Manitoba's need for franchise legislation, there are two<br />

primary reasons why Ontario's experience should be taken into account. First, it<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the three provinces in Canada to have franchise legislation, and it is<br />

known as having the most franchisee friendly version. This is important in<br />

Manitoba because, according to the <strong>Law</strong> Commission's report, it is a franchisee<br />

rather than a franchisor province. 15 Second, when drafting model legislation,<br />

the Uniform <strong>Law</strong> Conference <strong>of</strong> Canada followed Ontario's legislation as its<br />

base. However, rather than looking at Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise<br />

Disclosure), 2000/ 6 the following will consider articles and Legislative Assembly<br />

discussions to determine what factors influenced the province to introduce such<br />

legislation.<br />

Ontario first addressed the idea <strong>of</strong> introducing franchise legislation with the<br />

Grange Report recommendations <strong>of</strong> 1971. 17 However, no act would come to<br />

fruition until the much publicized Pizza Pizza case, 887574 Ontario Inc. v. Pizza<br />

12<br />

Alexandra Paul, "City Man Burned by Pizza Franchise Scam,, Winnipeg Free Press, (12<br />

February 2007), online: Winnipeg Free Press Live ; Paul Turenne, "Avoid Being the Victim," Winnipeg<br />

Sun (12 February 2007), online: Winnipeg SUN Media .<br />

13<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the most recent Pizza One cases from Ontario include Ramjit v. 3 <strong>of</strong> 1 Pizza &<br />

Wings (Canada) Inc., [2004] CarswellOnt 6402; Scott v. 3 for 1 Pizza & Wings (Canada)<br />

Inc., [2003] CarswellOnt 3790; MAA Diners Inc. v. 3 for 1 Pizza and Wings (Canada) Inc.<br />

(2003), 30 B.L.R. (3d) 279i Ali v. Triple 3 Holdings Inc., [2001] O.J. No. 5755.<br />

14<br />

Manitoba <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission, "Consultation Paper on Franchise Legislation," online:<br />

Current Projects at 15.<br />

15<br />

Ibid. at 47.<br />

16<br />

s.o. 2000, c. 3.<br />

17<br />

S.G.M. Grange, Report <strong>of</strong> the Minister's Committee on Referral Sales, Multi Level Sales and<br />

Franchises, Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> Financial and Commercial Affairs (1971).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!