09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that their initial experiences with the working world are regulated according to<br />

acceptable standards, and that these standards are followed.m<br />

H. Unpaid Leaves and Work.-Life Balance<br />

It is important that issues related to leaves and "work... life balance" be<br />

considered in their social and economic context, namely that women continue<br />

to do the vast majority <strong>of</strong> unpaid care work, including child care and the care <strong>of</strong><br />

family members who are elderly or have disabilities. In light <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constitutional reality that the federal government has jurisdiction over income<br />

replacement through the Employment Insurance Act ("EIA") 113 and that the<br />

provinces have jurisdiction over employment standards, the issue <strong>of</strong> "unpaid<br />

leaves" is really one <strong>of</strong> job protection for leaves required by employees.<br />

As described earlier in this submission, the feminization <strong>of</strong> the Canadian<br />

workforce has meant a double-bind for women: they are participating in the<br />

paid labour market in greater numbers {although <strong>of</strong>ten in low-wage, part-time<br />

and other precarious employment), while still performing a disproportionate<br />

share <strong>of</strong> unpaid care work in the home. 114 Thus, until the division <strong>of</strong> unpaid<br />

labour becomes more equal between men and women, the failure to provide job<br />

protection for necessary leaves to care for family members will continue to<br />

affect women more than men. As such, the way the law does or does not<br />

accommodate the realities <strong>of</strong> (predominantly women's) unpaid care work is a<br />

gender equality issue. Fulfilling the substantive equality guarantees enshrined<br />

in the Charter-as well as international and domestic human rights lawrequires<br />

meaningful and substantive recognition <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> mothering,<br />

parenting and caring for children and other family members, work that benefits<br />

society as a whole. As recognized by Dickson C.J., writing for the unanimous<br />

Supreme Court in Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd. 115 in the context <strong>of</strong> maternity<br />

leave: ·<br />

Combining paid work with motherhood and accommodating the child bearing needs <strong>of</strong><br />

working women are ever-increasing imperatives. That those who bear children and<br />

benefit society as a whole thereby should not be economically or socially disadvantaged<br />

seems to bespeak the obvious. Ic is only women who bear children; no man can become<br />

pregnant. As I argued earlier, it is unfair to impose all the costs <strong>of</strong> pregnancy upon onehalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

Unfortunately, Manitoba has not kept up with the trend in other Canadian<br />

jurisdictions with regard to job protection for leaves md removing eligibility<br />

thresholds for leaves.<br />

112<br />

Ibid. at 32.<br />

113<br />

S.C. 1996, c. 23.<br />

114<br />

See generally, Lorna Turnbull, Double Jeopardy: Motherwork and the <strong>Law</strong> (Toronto: Sumach<br />

Press, 2001).<br />

115<br />

[1989]1 S.C.R. 1219 at 1243-1244.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!