09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Disclosure)2000, P.E.I!sFranchises Act, and s. 2(4) <strong>of</strong> New Brunswick's Bill32<br />

states:<br />

This Act does not apply to [...] a relationship or arrangement arising out <strong>of</strong> an oral<br />

agreement where there is no writing that evidences any material term or aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationship or arrangement.<br />

This will in turn deter franchisees from entering into oral arrangements with<br />

franchisors and require that all promises be made in writing. Furthermore, since<br />

Manitoba has repealed its Statute <strong>of</strong> Frauds 178 dictating that a written<br />

agreement will override any alleged oral contract, 179 it is necessary to state this<br />

through franchise legislation.<br />

In conclusion, Manitoba ought to include Ontario's exclusion on oral<br />

representations made during the sale process to encourage potential franchisees<br />

to require franchisors to reduce all agreements to writing.<br />

2. Cooling--Off Period<br />

All Canadian franchise legislation allows for a 14 day period between the<br />

issuance <strong>of</strong> disclosure documents and the signing by the prospective franchisee<br />

<strong>of</strong> any agreement relating to the franchise or the payment <strong>of</strong> any consideration<br />

relating to the franchise. In addition to adopting such a provision, Manitoba<br />

should consider incorporating a cooling <strong>of</strong>f period.<br />

Although the two-week period grants franchisees ample time to acquaint<br />

themselves with all disclosure documents, a cooling <strong>of</strong>f period would allow<br />

them a final interlude during which to assess the purchase. Considering that, for<br />

the most part, franchise agreements last as long as 10 years and may be difficult<br />

to transfer, a potential franchisee will be investing a significant amount <strong>of</strong> time<br />

and money. Thus, once the agreement is signed, a seven day period would allow<br />

them to analyze the purchase with a "cooler head" and cancel it if so desired. In<br />

doing so, neither party would suffer a loss.<br />

To incorporate such a provision, Manitoba could emulate s 13 <strong>of</strong> Australia's<br />

Trade Practices Act 1974. The section states that a franchisee may terminate an<br />

agreement (being either a franchise agreement or an agreement to enter into a<br />

franchise agreement) within seven days after the earlier <strong>of</strong> entering into the<br />

agreement or making any payment under the agreement. A cooling-<strong>of</strong>f period<br />

will not be granted to a franchisee renewing, extending, or transferring an<br />

existing franchise agreement. In addition, if the franchisee decides to terminate<br />

the agreement during the cooling.-<strong>of</strong>f period, the franchisor must, within 14<br />

days, return all payments made by the franchisee to the franchisor under the<br />

agreement. However, the franchisor may deduct from this amount paid the<br />

178<br />

179<br />

An Act to Repeal The Statute <strong>of</strong> Frauds, C.C.S.M. c. Fl58, enacted as: R.S.M. 1987, c. F158.<br />

Frank Zaid, 'Franchising and The <strong>Law</strong>," online: Online Publications .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!