09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />

through a mandatory mediation program may very well be a waste <strong>of</strong> time and<br />

money in such instances. A mandatory mediation program should therefore not<br />

be adopted in Manitoba.<br />

A mandatory arbitration scheme lacks many <strong>of</strong> the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> mandatory<br />

mediation. Since arbitration is a binding method <strong>of</strong> solving disputes, it means<br />

that, once agreed upon, it will resolve the dispute between the parties, and<br />

absent some specific circumstance, the parties will have no further recourse or<br />

appeal rights after a decision is reached. 175 However, even many supporters <strong>of</strong><br />

ADR fear the ramifications <strong>of</strong> mandatory arbitration. Jean H. Gagnon, Vice.-<br />

President <strong>of</strong> the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section <strong>of</strong> the Quebec Division<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Canadian Bar Association and member <strong>of</strong> the Mediation and ADR<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> the Quebec Bar, argues that it is too delicate and dangerous to,<br />

by law, force the parties to a franchise dispute to resort to arbitration or any<br />

other ADR process. 176<br />

When considering arbitration as a mandatory means <strong>of</strong> conflict resolution, it is<br />

necessary to realize that a dispute resolved through arbitration can be as costly<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> fees and costs as a case going before a court. Furthermore, if one <strong>of</strong><br />

the parties is litigious in nature or is drawn to arbitration ainst its will,<br />

arbitration can also be a slow process which may take months and, sometimes,<br />

years before a final decision is reached and enforced. 177 Therefore, a mandatory<br />

arbitration scheme would also fail to provide a desired alternative method to<br />

litigation.<br />

In conclusion, Manitoba . should adopt neither mandatory mediation nor<br />

mandatory arbitration and should only introduce provisions dealing with a<br />

franchisor's disclosure requirements with regard to what ADR means it will<br />

adopt when a dispute arises.<br />

This concludes the list <strong>of</strong> issues for consultation suggested by the Manitoba <strong>Law</strong><br />

Reform Commission in the Consultation Paper on Franchise Legislation.<br />

F. Additional Suggestions<br />

1. Exclusions on Oral Representations During the Franchise Sale Process<br />

In order to prevent a franchisor abusing a franchisee by making oral<br />

representations that will not be enforced, Manitoba should follow the UFA,<br />

P.E.I.'s Act and New Brunswick's Bill and incorporate an exclusion for oral<br />

arrangements. Section 2(3) <strong>of</strong> the UFA, the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise<br />

75<br />

So, supra note 71 at 261.<br />

176<br />

Gagnon, supra note 154 at 13.<br />

177<br />

Jean H. Gagnon, "There Must be a Better Way to Resolve Franchise Disputes!" (2006),<br />

online: Jean H. Gagnon Consulting Services at 2.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!