09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for appointing the mediator; place <strong>of</strong> mediation; special experience factors for<br />

the mediator; confidentiality; costs and expenses <strong>of</strong> mediation; inability to<br />

resolve the matter; and procedures for mediation.t 70 Manitoba's provision<br />

should still adopt the open ended requirement that a general description be<br />

provided, while also enforcing a non exhaustive list <strong>of</strong> requirements, to<br />

encourage a franchisor to disclose certain details that the franchisee should<br />

know and are not required by the provision.<br />

Overall, Manitoba should incorporate dispute resolution provisions that require<br />

franchisors to disclose what method <strong>of</strong> ADR they will employ in case <strong>of</strong> a<br />

dispute, together with two lists <strong>of</strong> what must be disclosed in the case where<br />

mediation or arbitration are the ADR methods <strong>of</strong> choice.<br />

3. Should Manitoba Adopt a Mandatory ADR Process<br />

While primarily a voluntary process, the use <strong>of</strong> ADR can be mandatory in<br />

certain instances. As a result, even parties that want to litigate, who do not<br />

wish to mediate, or arbitrate a dispute, may be required by law to use ADR<br />

methods prior to having their cases heard in a court <strong>of</strong> law.m To date, two<br />

Canadian provinces, British Columbia and Ontario, have introduced some form<br />

<strong>of</strong> mandatory pre... trial mediation into the civil court process, meaning that<br />

mediation is or can be required after an action has been commenced, but before<br />

it reaches trial. 172<br />

Adopting a mandatory mediation process for franchise disputes would have<br />

both positive and negative aspects. One <strong>of</strong> the advantages <strong>of</strong> mediation is that<br />

it is less adversarial than arbitration, and therefore, less disruptive <strong>of</strong> business<br />

relationships. Furthermore, since there are other options available if mediation<br />

should fail, entering into a mediation process is essentially without risk. 173 The<br />

International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution C'CPR") supports<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> mediation to resolve franchise disputes:<br />

In fact, failure is the exception. [...] with the assistance <strong>of</strong> a skillful mediator, parties<br />

to a great variety <strong>of</strong> business disputes have succeeded in bridging wide gaps in their<br />

positions and <strong>of</strong>ten in developing creative, mutually advantageous business solutions.<br />

However, CPR dearly states that the principal pre condition to mediation is<br />

that the parties share a genuine desire to resolve the dispute promptly in an<br />

equitable manner. 174 Mediation will fail if the parties are not willing to partake<br />

in the process and resolve the dispute. Consequently, forcing parties to mediate<br />

170<br />

Ibid. at 25.<br />

171<br />

So, supra note 71 at 263.<br />

172<br />

Peter Snell & Larry Weinberg, eds., "Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Franchising- Canada," (Forum on<br />

Franchising, American Bar Association, 2005) at 327.<br />

173<br />

CPR, supra note 152 at 2.<br />

174<br />

Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!