09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

contains numerous lawsuits commenced against the franchisor may dissuade<br />

prospective franchisees from acquiring the franchise. Consequently, franchisors<br />

have commenced to utilize mandatory arbitration or ADR clauses in their<br />

franchise agreements, mandating that disputes must first be resolved through<br />

ADR instead <strong>of</strong> through litigation, with the goal <strong>of</strong> having a smaller number <strong>of</strong><br />

disputes to disclose. 150 In doing so, the franchise may appear more appealing to a<br />

prospective franchisee.<br />

From a franchisee's perspective, ADR <strong>of</strong>fers a less expensive means <strong>of</strong> dispute<br />

resolution than litigation, removing barriers associated to justice such as cost,<br />

location and duration. 151 For instance, although the length <strong>of</strong> mediation varies<br />

with the complexity <strong>of</strong> the dispute, mediation <strong>of</strong> a typical franchise dispute may<br />

take 10 15 hours and involve two or three sessions. 152 ADR will also allow a<br />

franchisee to avoid the combative nature <strong>of</strong> litigation, fostering the preservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> commercial relationships while parties attempt to resolve a dispute. 153<br />

Furthermore, the franchise relationship presents some particular aspects which<br />

make it critical that the courts have special tools to deal effectively with their<br />

disputes. 154 Some <strong>of</strong> the concerns that franchisors and franchisees have to<br />

address when a dispute arises between them include:<br />

• It is very difficult for all parties to continue working together on a daily<br />

basis while pursuing a court case between them;<br />

• In many cases, a franchisee who decides to sue his franchisor is not, at<br />

that time, in a good financial position;<br />

• Where the amounts paid to franchisors by the franchisee are the only, or<br />

main, source <strong>of</strong> income, franchisors have found themselves in<br />

problematic positions toward their franchisees by reason <strong>of</strong> the slowness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the court system; and<br />

• Another problem encountered by franchisors and franchisees when<br />

disputes arise is the uncertainty in regard <strong>of</strong> their contractual<br />

relationship during the time when litigation has taken place, most<br />

specifically in the event where the franchisor has terminated the<br />

agreement by reason <strong>of</strong> one or several defaults committed by the<br />

150<br />

So, supra note 71 at 266.<br />

151<br />

Ibid.at 261.<br />

152<br />

International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR), "National Franchise<br />

Mediation Program: A dispute Resolution Process for Franchising," online:<br />

at 4.<br />

153<br />

So, supra note 71 at 264.<br />

154<br />

Jean H. Gagnon, 11 Some Considerations Regarding the Judicial and NonJudicial Resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> Franchisors/Franchisees Disputes," (1 April 2003), online: Jean H. Gagnon Consulting<br />

Services at 7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!