09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although implementing a regulatory body would give more ('teeth" to any<br />

franchise legislation, several lawyers, primarily those representing franchisors,<br />

oppose such a change. Joseph Adler, an Ontario based lawyer, argues that such<br />

cumbersome laws will only dissuade honest franchisors from conducting<br />

business in that province and increase the cost <strong>of</strong> doing business for franchisors<br />

and franchises. 141 Mr. Dillon, who also opposes such a body, blames the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> media attention the 3 for 1 Pizza cases have received. He states:<br />

When one considers the number <strong>of</strong> franchises operating in the province [<strong>of</strong> Ontario]<br />

at any time, it should not come as a surprise that a certain number <strong>of</strong> systems will<br />

operate below the accepted community standard in the enforcement and performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> their franchise rights and obligations. 141<br />

Mr. Dillon argues that instead <strong>of</strong> introducing a regulator, it should be<br />

franchisees' responsibility to inform themselves and become acquainted with all<br />

disclosure documents prior to purchasing a franchise, in order to avoid being<br />

abused. 143 A franchisee may become informed by using the large variety <strong>of</strong><br />

resources made available by the CFA, 114 the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Government<br />

Services, 145 at or a number <strong>of</strong> franchise magazines and publications that would<br />

empower a franchise prospect to avoid many <strong>of</strong> the situations in which these<br />

people find themselves. After all, an individual must be expected to take some<br />

responsibility for his own welfare. Mr. Dillon then adds that the direct costs <strong>of</strong><br />

administering such a regime, and the indirect cost to the industry sector as a<br />

whole <strong>of</strong> being subject to further regulation are incalculable. He closes by<br />

pointing out that Alberta abandoned its regulatory system after 24 years in favor<br />

<strong>of</strong> a presale disclosure regime. 146 At this point it is important to note that in<br />

1992 Manitoba's Legislature refused to adopt franchise legislation based on<br />

Alberta's old model.<br />

Last, Richard Cunningham, president <strong>of</strong> the CFA in 2006, opposes the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> such a body on the grounds that there is no need for<br />

regulators. Instead, he suggests that franchisees should inform themselves<br />

properly or consult specialists in franchise law before entering into a deal. 147<br />

Consequently, the CFA <strong>of</strong>fers workshops to its members, such as the "Franchise<br />

141<br />

Daw, supra note 133.<br />

142<br />

Dillon, supra note 131.<br />

143<br />

Ibid. at 2.<br />

144<br />

Canadian Franchise Association, "Events Education," online: Canadian Franchise<br />

Association .<br />

145<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Ontario, "Ministry <strong>of</strong> Government Services.'' online: Government <strong>of</strong><br />

Ontario .<br />

146<br />

Ibid.<br />

147<br />

Daw, supra note 133.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!