UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />
ii.Renewal <strong>of</strong> Contract<br />
The franchise agreement may include a right <strong>of</strong> renewal for the franchisee,<br />
which would be exercisable only if the franchisee has complied with certain<br />
conditions. Typical conditions precedent to the exercise <strong>of</strong> a renewal option are<br />
that the franchisee (i) is in good standing under the franchise agreement and all<br />
other agreements with the franchisor; (ii) provides to the franchisor written<br />
notice <strong>of</strong> its intent to renew; (iii) agrees to execute the then current standard<br />
franchise agreement used by the franchisor for the grant <strong>of</strong> new franchises; and<br />
(iv) agrees to pay the franchisor a renewal fee. 116 In the absence <strong>of</strong> renewal. the<br />
franchisor will be free to retain, re...license, close, or re...organize the business for<br />
its own account. 117<br />
Since Manitoba courts have yet to hear a franchise renewal case, it is necessary<br />
to look to other jurisdictions to determine if the common law already provides<br />
sufficient protection upon renewal. In Sultani v. Blenz The Canadian C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />
Co., 118 the British Columbia Supreme Court held that a duty <strong>of</strong> fair dealing<br />
imposed on a franchisor does not go so far as to compel a party to renew an<br />
expiring relationship when it is not commercially reasonable to do so, and<br />
where there is no express right <strong>of</strong> renewal contained in the agreement. In<br />
Thompson v, Cinnaroll Bakeries Ltd., 119 the Alberta Court <strong>of</strong> Queen's Bench held<br />
that, according to the franchise agreement, the franchisee was bound to renew<br />
the contract unless significant changes had been made to the original contract,<br />
such as an increase in royalty payments and loss <strong>of</strong> exclusivity in a specific<br />
market.<br />
The precedent established by renewal cases fails to adequately address the<br />
renewal <strong>of</strong> franchise agreements. It fails to deal with situations where oral<br />
promises to renew are not upheld as well as instances where the franchise<br />
agreement does not mention the option <strong>of</strong> renewal, where franchise parties are<br />
not bound to exercise good faith and fair dealing. It is clear that legislation is<br />
necessary to complement the common law, forcing parties to exercise their best<br />
business behavior when dealing with each other upon renewal.<br />
Having established that Manitoba is in need <strong>of</strong> renewal provisions, one s:10uld<br />
consider how other jurisdictions with franchise legislation address the matter.<br />
Since none <strong>of</strong> the Canadian provinces with franchise regulation include renewal<br />
clause, one must look abroad. The United States, having implemented<br />
116<br />
Zaid, supra nate 67 at 14.<br />
111 Paul J. Bates & R. David House, "Canadian Franchise Disputes/' (Paper presented to the<br />
6th Annual Franchise Conference: The Domino Effect, November 2006) [Toronto: Ontario<br />
Bar Association Continuing Legal Education) at 10.<br />
118<br />
[2005] B.C.J. No. 846.<br />
119 [2002] ABQB 1112.