09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />

ii.Renewal <strong>of</strong> Contract<br />

The franchise agreement may include a right <strong>of</strong> renewal for the franchisee,<br />

which would be exercisable only if the franchisee has complied with certain<br />

conditions. Typical conditions precedent to the exercise <strong>of</strong> a renewal option are<br />

that the franchisee (i) is in good standing under the franchise agreement and all<br />

other agreements with the franchisor; (ii) provides to the franchisor written<br />

notice <strong>of</strong> its intent to renew; (iii) agrees to execute the then current standard<br />

franchise agreement used by the franchisor for the grant <strong>of</strong> new franchises; and<br />

(iv) agrees to pay the franchisor a renewal fee. 116 In the absence <strong>of</strong> renewal. the<br />

franchisor will be free to retain, re...license, close, or re...organize the business for<br />

its own account. 117<br />

Since Manitoba courts have yet to hear a franchise renewal case, it is necessary<br />

to look to other jurisdictions to determine if the common law already provides<br />

sufficient protection upon renewal. In Sultani v. Blenz The Canadian C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

Co., 118 the British Columbia Supreme Court held that a duty <strong>of</strong> fair dealing<br />

imposed on a franchisor does not go so far as to compel a party to renew an<br />

expiring relationship when it is not commercially reasonable to do so, and<br />

where there is no express right <strong>of</strong> renewal contained in the agreement. In<br />

Thompson v, Cinnaroll Bakeries Ltd., 119 the Alberta Court <strong>of</strong> Queen's Bench held<br />

that, according to the franchise agreement, the franchisee was bound to renew<br />

the contract unless significant changes had been made to the original contract,<br />

such as an increase in royalty payments and loss <strong>of</strong> exclusivity in a specific<br />

market.<br />

The precedent established by renewal cases fails to adequately address the<br />

renewal <strong>of</strong> franchise agreements. It fails to deal with situations where oral<br />

promises to renew are not upheld as well as instances where the franchise<br />

agreement does not mention the option <strong>of</strong> renewal, where franchise parties are<br />

not bound to exercise good faith and fair dealing. It is clear that legislation is<br />

necessary to complement the common law, forcing parties to exercise their best<br />

business behavior when dealing with each other upon renewal.<br />

Having established that Manitoba is in need <strong>of</strong> renewal provisions, one s:10uld<br />

consider how other jurisdictions with franchise legislation address the matter.<br />

Since none <strong>of</strong> the Canadian provinces with franchise regulation include renewal<br />

clause, one must look abroad. The United States, having implemented<br />

116<br />

Zaid, supra nate 67 at 14.<br />

111 Paul J. Bates & R. David House, "Canadian Franchise Disputes/' (Paper presented to the<br />

6th Annual Franchise Conference: The Domino Effect, November 2006) [Toronto: Ontario<br />

Bar Association Continuing Legal Education) at 10.<br />

118<br />

[2005] B.C.J. No. 846.<br />

119 [2002] ABQB 1112.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!