09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

106 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />

• There has been no material change since the existing franchise<br />

agreement or latest renewal or extension <strong>of</strong> the existing franchise<br />

agreement.<br />

In such a case, the franchisee would already posses all the required information<br />

to make the purchase, hence the exemption.<br />

When drafting an exemptions section for Manitoba, the differences between<br />

Alberta and Ontario should be noted. For instance, Ontario does not have an<br />

equivalent <strong>of</strong> Alberta's s. 5(1)(g). The section creates an exemption from<br />

disclosure when the sale is <strong>of</strong> a right to a person to sell goods or services within<br />

or adjacent to a retail establishment as a department or division <strong>of</strong> the<br />

establishment, if the person is not required to purchase goods or services from<br />

the operator <strong>of</strong> the retail establishment More importantly, Alberta has<br />

incorporated one further exemption by allowing the Minister to exempt any<br />

person or franchise from any or all provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act or regulations upon<br />

becoming satisfied that to do so would not be prejudicial to the public interest. 82<br />

This is an important difference because it allows the Minister to create further<br />

exemptions upon application where the occasion so warrants.<br />

Manitoba should follow Alberta's example and adopt its exemptions section.<br />

Not only is the section more extensive but also it contains the further<br />

exemption that allows a Minister to grant an exemption where to do so would<br />

not be prejudicial to the public interest. In keeping with the act's purpose <strong>of</strong> aiding<br />

the franchisee to make an informed decision, an exemption will still allow the<br />

franchisee to do so while fostering expediency.<br />

2. Exemption from Franchisor's Obligation to Provide Financial<br />

Statements<br />

Financial disclosure is a very sensitive topic. Consequently, most franchisors are<br />

wary <strong>of</strong> disclosing sensitive financial information in the form <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

statements required to be provided as part <strong>of</strong> a disclosure document. The<br />

general requirement to disclose financial information about the franchisor is to<br />

inform the prospective franchisee <strong>of</strong> the financial health and success <strong>of</strong> their<br />

prospective franchisor. The provisions in Alberta, P.E.I. and Ontario providing<br />

franchisors with an exemption from disclosing financial statements were<br />

intended to provide mature, established and financially viable franchisors that<br />

have a consistent record <strong>of</strong> good relations with franchisees and who comply<br />

with the law from having to disclose financial information to prospective<br />

franchisees, or where to so exempt would not prejudice the public interest. 83 In<br />

order to better understand the financial document disclosure exemption, it is<br />

necessary to consider the actual provisions.<br />

82<br />

S.A. 1995 c. F#l7.1, s. 6.<br />

83<br />

Zaid, supra note 67 at 34-35.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!